Correlates but follows behind. Most data shows the CO2 rising after temperature rises, most likely due to CO2 being released from bodies of water.
Also like I said, the absorption of IR by CO2 is already saturated, it doesn't matter how much more you add to the atmosphere. All of the IR radiation that can be, is already being absorbed at the relevant wavelengths.
>>7812903 The only driving force in the 21st century is 7.5 billion breeding, eating, shitting and war mongering monkeys. Everything else is irrelevant, really!
It is meant to be a catch all to solve everything, take peoples carbon away and they cease to live, as carbon is the element of life. Hydrocarbons essential to life in the 21st century. Everyone wants to rule the world, no one person ever will though, the Black Pope of Rome is about as close as it's going to get, but even that despot can only do so much.
>>7812754 Climate change with the release of greenhouse gasses is a real thing.
That said, nobody actually knows what the fuck kind of impact that will have on us and anyone acting like they are certain are almost certainly wrong. Some say desertification and rising ocean levels, it could just as well mean increased precipitation and decreasing ocean levels. Climate models are basically impossible to accurately calculate.
Also, what the fuck can actually be done about it besides dismantling industrializing civilization?
>Also, what the fuck can actually be done about it besides dismantling industrializing civilization?
I've said it before I'll say it again, full scale nationalistic war by a nation that wants to >actually< survive.
I mean, throw out the geneva conventions. I'm talking release GMO viral superbugs, cruise missiles into coal burning power plants.
The idea is you do actually reduce global industrial civilization and establish an absolute industrial hegemony in your own country. There really is only one country capable of this, but sooner rather than later there will be more and such a scenario relies heavily on first-strike capability.
>>7813242 >I've said it before I'll say it again, full scale nationalistic war by a nation that wants to >actually< survive.
I can't say I've ever heard of that proposed as a solution to global warming, but it does fit into the conspiracy theories about 'Agenda 21' and idea that 'the elite' want to achieve strong AI and develop automated economies, just so they can exterminate 90% of the human population to conserve resources, ect.
Good call. I hear more logical arguments for genocide than the other way around anymore.
I hope you don't think I'm trafficking in conspiracy theories. I'm just riffing. You might be able to find explicit analogous strategies defined in sci-fi fiction or even actual military manuals.
There is no conspiracy involved. The military has planned contingencies for everything. For example, Peak oil was described after the end of WWII as the major organizing concept behind the modern military strategy, hence the creation of nuclear powered naval warships laden with nuclear warheads.
You do realize that, in terms of the US, there are an unknown number (over 20) nuclear submarines each with hundreds of independently-targettable warheads in every ocean of the world following a protocol where they will attack based on protocols designed to provide for the survival of military (and governmental continuity) regardless of the political existence of the mother country.
The DoD has already released many position papers on global warming. In terms of strategy, its like you are in a mexican stand-off with several confirmed serial killers in a closed room and Global warming walks in the door, dressed like an insane clown and holding a hand grenade.
Sure, it's a problem, but not >really< until he goes to pull the pin.
>>7813196 Yes, eventually you will be taxed just for being a carbon based life form, it's pure genius and why it requires and extra helping of propaganda to get er done so to speak. Under economic taxation there are loopholes. You don't just manufacture 1 million "climate scientists" without intent.
>>7812790 Where do you tards get this crap? No, CO2 isn't saturated. This is a completely made up lie.
>>7812816 >Correlates but follows behind. Most data shows the CO2 rising after temperature rises, most likely due to CO2 being released from bodies of water. The fact that warming results in more CO2 being released from oceans doesn't disprove that CO2 results in increased warming. Both are true.
Who cares if global warming is found out to be untrue, don't people see this as a wake up call? Certainly pollution and overconsumption of resources isn't good for us or the rest of the species, who cares if the predictions are vastly overbown?
Funding and invesment hould be increased for research and development in: solar and wind energy, better batteries, electric cars, in vitro meat, and other "green" technology. Also wouldn't removing any dependence on oil make tne Saudis go broke and stop them from funding ISIS? Bam! Two birds stoned at once
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.