>bosses want to automate transport with robots and AI
>signal failure delays every week even with human drivers
>muh robotic revolution!!
Who else here convinced that automation and AI won't get anywhere near to what technolibtards are hyping about?
>>7811916
All we need is a self-replicating nanobot designed to kill humans, shouldn't be too much to ask.
>>7811920
Rumours are that working sex bots will also lead the the (slow) extinction of the human race.
>>7811916
we are still so very very far away from anything remotely close to AI. we won't have AI till we basically create true synthetic brains, and thats not going to happen until we actually figure out how our brains work.
shit, we don't even have the power supply or linear actuators required to make a decent android, OP's pic is uncanny as fuck.
>>7812391
I want it fast to be honest.
>>7812391
we already have fleshlight / onaholes
wouldn't be a stretch to insert that into a robot like OP's pic related
>>7812391
No. It will lead to a religion that includes the commandment that states that "Thou shall not stick it in a machine". Everyone who can't stick to that rule will be run out and join the dying world outside. The primitive superstitious culties will inherent the Earth.
>>7812391
After the first round of news stories of sexbots malfunctioning and chomping at people's bits rolls in I think any enthusiasm for them will be quelled.
>>7811916
What's a signal failure?