/sci/ how do you possibly expect to compete with Mac's flawless argument against evolution?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16p_16BguFM
>>7807868
Anyone who has taken an intro course in biology could probably understand the foundational papers of evolutionary biology. So they are just retarded.
It is true that appeal to authority effects the direction of science all the time. Just like how the christian church was the authority that led people to believe the earth was flat, and how the modern scientific reverants like michio kaku and degrasse is bullshitting people about quantum magic.
its a shame for sure
>>7807897
Isn't quantum physics just our current best understanding of the universe?
>>7807909
No. Because it would have to be based on measurable, observable data, and not coocoo magic.
>>7807868
That's where the power is, the strong paradigm stays for a while and when its time is up it gets blasted out of the water by an even stronger one. It's just the price you pay for playing the science game, either you end up wrong in some way or your shit was too weak to matter.
>>7807950
But isn't quantum tunneling the only explanation we have for overcoming some shortcomings in modern physics on how the sun functions?
>>7808039
He's memeing you. Quantum physics is based entirely on experimentation.
Superstring, multiverse and the like are the ones based on conjecture not tested by experiment.
>>7807950
Quantum Knots were just proved
http://www.aalto.fi/en/current/news/2016-01-14-005/
If evolution is real, why does the gay gene exist?
It serves literally no evolutionary purpose and, from an evolutionary standpoint, is detrimental.
Checkmate.
>>7809370
Sisters of homosexual men have more kids than average.
Checkmate.
>>7809370
Pretty sure there's no gay gene exactly, just a different in brain chemistry.