Thread replies: 23
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Daily prove it thread 2016-01-24 16:31:24 Post No. 7807122
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Daily prove it thread 2016-01-24 16:31:24 Post No. 7807122
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Post your proofs and shit on other's proofs.
Only rule: No QED = DON'T POST
Just got to the part of my linear algebra book (p.240 and beyond) where they finally define matrix multiplication as composition of linear maps and there are a bunch of short matrix algebra proofs as problems left for the reader. Enjoy my basic logic process.
>>
File: 1453653084125s.png (88KB, 635x711px) Image search:
[Google]
88KB, 635x711px
>proof
>words
you're doing it fucking wrong m8
nice retard-tier handwriting by the way
>>
>>7807122
Not a very rigorous proof you have there, induction is probably the way to go here
>>
>>7807122
Go back to pencils, kid. You've proven you aren't ready for pens yet.
>>
>>7807122
Dude I can't even shit on your proof because the image resolution and your handwriting is too much shit already. Post a clear photo and I'll bother to read it. Until then, no thanks!
>>
>>7807122
holy shit you write worse than I do when I write something I know I will never read again lol
>>
>>
>>7807122
I hate it when people put "qed" under their proves.
>>
>>7807263
*proofs
>>
>>
>>7807330
Use blacksquare [math] \blacksquare [/math]
>>
>proof thread
>1 babby tier proof
>10 comments
>9 comments on calligraphy
/sci/ in a nutshell
>>
>>7807263
>I hate it when people put "qed" under their proves.
Why? Because it's no longer the fashionable notation for signaling end-of-proof?
>>
File: 23j4x80.jpg (445KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
445KB, 1600x1200px
>>
>>7807356
You're white balance are wrong
>>
>>7807356
>J wst loolc at his hmdwnting.
>>
>>7807345
It's pretentious as fuck.
>>
>>7807398
I always write out the whole "quod erat demonstrandum". Hate me.
>>
>>7807519
>He writes in Latin
>Not Ancient Greek
What a pleb.
>>
[math]
{EXP}_{n}(x)= \begin{cases} 0, & \mbox{if } n\mbox{ is n \leq |x|} \\ 3n+1, & \mbox{if } n\mbox{ is n > |x|} \end{cases}
[/math]
>>
>>7807527
Greeks were meme mathematicians. Indians were superior.
>>
>>7807122
>which by simple observations
:^)
>>
>>7807674
Well, if you were to evaluate H to the power of p+q, in terms of linear transformations, you would be doing h p + q times.
I proved that if you get the composition of the map h to the power of p and the map h to the power q, what you get is the map h p + q times.
Thread posts: 23
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3