Was this a good show for science and critical thinking?

>>7804642
Science? No. Critical thinking? Yes.

>>7804642
>>7804662
It's good for entertainment of the "lol stupid hippies" and "lol stupid christfags" variety. Barely any educational value of any kind unless you are less informed than a hamburger.

>>7804690
They aren't a bad resource for education though. They made good points in every single episode.

No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penn_%26_Teller:_Bullshit!#Criticism

They didn't even do the last episode on their bullshit like they promised.

>>7804711
Because it was cancelled before they could. It also feels like they only admitted to the alleged bullshit on their shows because of peer pressure.

>>7804711
>using Wikipedia as a source for information

Just look at the talk threads of almost any page surrounding a controversial issue. There's arguments abound regarding wikipedia's alleged neutrality.

>>7804662
No to both, actually. Letting fringe parts of the opposing side ramble on for a bit, and then attacking their claims furiously without letting anyone reply does not resemble critical thinking.

>>7804847
Regardless of their methods they supported their side pretty well.

>gun control episode
Gun control is bullshit because sometimes people need to defend themselves!

>death penalty episode
The death penalty is bullshit because it's never okay to kill a person under any circumstances!

>>7804972
That isn't what they said, but thanks for the reply liberal.