She's just a latina. Her work is really subpar and she's in string theory which is a dead fucking field. Everyone moved to dark matter/energy. This is just the media hyping her reputation because of her skin color. She's just like other engineers/scientists her age.
>>7804396 Who is Sheldon? If you ever studied physics at the university level you would know string theory is not a popular subject among professionals. It reached a dead end in the past decade. New data showed what string theorist tried to prove was coming from data matter/energy. You should also research the debate among those who disagree on suppersymmetry while you're at it.
>>7804400 I did a lot of her papers are on string theory or its variations. You can do String theory approach to OG, but that's been done in the past. I don't understand why every young person goes into ST. A lot of professionals don't like it because it showing that its more alchemy than science. We also won't know anything until the ILC is build and we can test some of Einstein theories in a lab. I'm an applied guy so I have a hesitation against theorists. Half of the time they're wrong.
>>7804427 >http://arxiv.org/find/hep-th/1/au:+Pasterski_S/0/1/0/all/0/1 I am in her website. She has more papers there. The five on this page are on OG and the possibility of higher dimension than 4D which is found within GR.
She's doing everything right now. Which is typical of PhD students. I see string, QG, QFT, and QED. She's most likely going to end up doing something with QG and string. She talks a lot about S-matrix which is only found within QM and ST. She wants know if there is higher dimension than 4 which is what Einstein proved 100 years ago. Bascially she's joining in the race to understand gravity. I've yet to see anything new, but let see if she does anything new. Otherwise she'll end up like the others. Debating others why they're wrong and she's right. Its ashamed I've seen a lot intelligent people just go down this route because their work can't be proved without laboratory experiments. I am an engineer, so I've seen a lot in my time.
>>7804348 I am not impressed. Her daddy was an electrical engineer and businessman. He most likely deprived her of TV and entertainment for most of her life and forced her into becoming an engineering nerd. I bet she's socially awkward as fuck and only does what her daddy tells her to do. Einstein is the real deal. His parents didn't force him into doing anything. Einstein didn't just read a bunch of textbooks, he pioneered new fields. That girl is an autist. Also, she's cuban. LOL. She's not even a member of the Jewish master race. And she's a female too. Come on /sci/, you can do better than this.
You can say I am jealous if you want, but all I am saying is that if I was raised in a rich family with a daddy who taught me everything, I would have become an academic monkey as well.
>>7804493 money buys everything. Also Einstein did read a lot of textbooks. They were math and philosophy. Einstein just found a problem with gravity because of Riemann mathematics. That's how he created SR/GR. Also she only applied to Harvard and MIT. Look at her Scientific American interview. I get parental pressure vibe from her. So if daddy did force to do everything, than she is an autist and a secret slut.
>>7804497 Daddy's little girl is always a slut. I can't wait until she finally stops being a virgin nerd. Once the right male comes along and feeds her the correct dick, she'll realize she threw away most of her life being daddy's puppet. She will then pursue a major in political science and realize that math/science is for males.
>>7804510 Autistic means you're only focus one task and don't have social skills. Which is very common with people like her. I've met determined kids like her, and they're often weird and can't do much else beside their specialty. This is where the meme of geniuses can't tie their shoes or talk to people comes from. A real genius is someone like Feynman, who wasn't autistic nor weird.
>>7804517 I doubt she's a virgin, statistically speaking. A lot of intelligent women are dominant leaning so she can be into BDSM. But studies done at elite colleges found kids do have less sex there. They're more focus on their work. Which most later regret.
>>7804510 I am not 100% sure if she is an autistic, but I am positive she is daddy's little girl. Meaning that she does everything to please him. Also, I highly doubt she would have been so successful without the help of her upbringing. Most cubans do not have parents with electrical engineering backgrounds.
Donald Trump once said that he had a tough life. His dad only gave him a "million dollar" loan when he was a teenager. Times were rough according to Trump.
>>7804348 Can anyone please measure the traits," next Albert Einstein ? How exactly are these traits measure? Any single time an article has next Albert Einstein, it's almost an attempt to lure in readers.
>>7804576 OP's thread is no different. He used that title to lure us in. The truth is, there are very few Einsteins so saying such a thing is silly. There's more lottery winners than Einsteins. Einsteins only occur once or twice per century. I personally define Einstein as a genius of the geniuses. We would have been wise to clone him. We simply chopped his brain up and ran test on it in various labs. Imagine what the world would look like today if we cloned 10,000 Einsteins.
These math monkeys that get their PhDs at early ages aren't geniuses to me. They never amount to anything. I wish the media would stop reporting on them.
>>7804602 I sexually identify as a pseudo-Riemannian Manifold. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of having my own non-degenerate, smooth, symmetric metric. People say to me that a person being a pseudo-Riemannian Manifold is impossible and I’m fucking retarded but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install tangent spaces, geodesic lines and vector fields on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “M” and respect my right to be defined purely from my intrinsic geometry. If you can’t accept me you’re a maniphobe and need to check your geometric privilege. Thank you for being so understanding.
>>7804724 Hi femanon. Did we offend you? Are you denying that being born in a nice upbringing is not useful? I don't know if you've done your homework on this girl but she clearly says she built stuff "for her father". In other words, she did stuff to please daddy. If that doesn't sound like a daddy's girl then I don't know what is. If Einstein created the theory of relatively to please mommy then it would be fair to call him a momma's boy.
This girl is not a genius. She was raised by smart parents and they taught her advanced stuff. Show me someone who doesn't come from that background and I'll be impressed. You probably think Trump is an impressive businessman. His daddy only loaned him "one million" when he was a teenager. Poor Trump only had a million to work with when he started his first business but he pulled through. Trump is amazing!
>>7804757 I don't know the numbers but aren't females in the majority in colleges? If anything, shouldn't there be more affirmative action for males.
Also, I always hated the concept of affirmative action until I went to silicon valley and realized it was overrun with asians. Can we please get some affirmative action for anyone who isn't asian at some of the top tech companies. It felt like I was in an asian country when I first stepped on Google's campus. Whites were in the top executive positions but in general were a minority. I'd say at Google it was 45% indians and 40% east asians. Asians are try-hards who game the academic system and tap dance their way into silicon valley. Despite the fact that universities have shit on asians in every way possible they are still taking over. tl;dr can we get some affirmative action for white males at Google, Amazon, Microsoft, etc...
>>7804786 You'll never have pro white male affirmative action forget it.
If you are really better than the Asians then prove it. Find your own startup. Apple and IBM didn't spawn out of thin air. You won't break into the silicon market, but then again finding a nice market is the challenge in the first place.
>>7804836 I already know I am superior to those academic monkeys who game the system. I interned at Google over the summer but I have no interest in working there. I will create my own company. I just wish they did something about their hiring process.
Asians score the highest in all tests, even IQ tests. They deserve those jobs and obviously they get hired because big companies want the best talent there, so that the best talent does not go to their competitors. It is simple logic.
Unfortunately, this 'logic' only applies to asians. Nobody fucks with the asians. However, white people are always the second in all tests, including IQ. But people don't give a fuck about this.
Black people and everyone else will demand affirmartive action to get ahead of white people, even though they show they are inherently better at these tasks. But no one messes with the asians for some reason.
If you ask me, it is not only the academic game the asians are winning, also the social one. They are literally the privileged demographic and yet nobody bothers them. White people get literally all the shit and they are just the second (and by a big difference, from asians).
>>7804599 >Imagine what the world would look like today if we cloned 10,000 Einsteins.
Not that much different because intelligence depends on environment as well as genetics? His singular creativity and drive probably wouldn't translate no matter how closely you try to replicate his genes.
Not that anon but I'm a bit familiar with this situation and it seems the women will ultimately have no choice but to date across educational boundaries, as a matter of fact it's stated in the link above that such tendencies (high education female x low educated male) has increased over the past few decades. Although this may simply come from the fact more women are going to college in general.
Regardless of this, the bitch tears being shed by anons about affirmative action for women might prove to (assuming these same anons are college educated) be a boon for them since they get the pick of the litter more now. But I've also heard anons express interest in non-western females because of cultural values too.
Either way more women will date lower educated men because they no choice or a sudden unexpected increase of lesbians occur.
You are right that they do deserve those jobs but that doesn't mean they are the "best" it just means they meet or exceed all the qualifications "by the books". Which is a problem because their culture and education system tends to tailor them for such testing so it's hard to discern between a asian/ indian who is specifically best for the job because they excel in in the subject or the testing of said subject. Which believe it or not there is a difference between the two.
But unlike the anon you arguing with I don't hate on asians for this since it's the system incorporated by companies that allow for this. In other words, don't hate the player hate the game.
>>7805130 >says who? your stupid iq test? Says the tables that calculate the average scores across races.
>SAT is for the US only Yeah but every country has their standarized test to give students. Most of the times, every university has their own. Unfortunately, the research has not gone this far.
> school grades dont mean shit Oh I see. You are a special snowflake who gets Ds but you are oh so smart. Like, really smart, it is just you are too lazy to get high grades. Yeah yeah, keep stroking it sperg.
>IQ tests dont mean shit IQ means what it is meant to test. It tests pattern recognition and puzzle solving skills, which in turn makes it a good test for chess. Puzzle solving is very similar to problem solving and pattern recognition is very important high level maths/science.
But I know right? You are really good at these things but you have an IQ of 70 so obviously the test is flawed, not yourself. You special snowflake tumblrina.
I get my data from simple research. A good example is here: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-A-_5w-BKJhE/VEJY6on3tiI/AAAAAAAABEM/DxA90dIvsrk/s1600/iq%2Brace%2Bsat%2B2014%2Bsat-act%2Bcomposite.png
Unfortunately it also covers gender but what can we do in this social justice warrior america.
Also, how do you think corporations hire?
Do you think they sit down with you, give you some hot chocolate and then politely ask you to tell them about how good you are? Fuck that, they see grades and work experience. Nobody cares about your special snowflake 'hidden talents' that 'can't be graded by the SAT'.
>>7805123 IQ test are clearly bullshit. Asians out perform whites on IQ test and grades but look at the history of mankind. Almost everything in the last hundred of years was invented by whites. Those silicon valley companies are based upon white inventions. There is clearly something flawed in our testing system. Also, what's the deal with India? Indians do so well here in silicon valley but if you visit India it looks like a 3rd world shithole.
With all of this said, I am not being racist against Asians. The most brilliant people I've met have been asians, but I am simply saying that there is something our test is not showing. They are without a doubt brilliant people, but something is off.
>>7805166 > Almost everything in the last hundred of years was invented by whites
Not true, you are only aware of 'white' science. China and japan both do heavy research, which is at the same level of american and european research. You are just not looking at the big picture.
>white inventions Are you listening to yourself
>The big companies in america were founded by white americans!
No shit sherlock. I bet the big companies in asia were started by asians. To continue with my main point, there are also big asian software companies. Again, you have the delusion that only american companies exist.
>what's the deal with India? I don't know man. Affirmative action?
>t there is something our test is not showing Yeah, and that something is your amazing emotional talents! We need an SAT that covers our emotions and feelings too!
>>7805153 >Says the tables that calculate the average scores across races. cool. I'd like to meet that table.
>Yeah but every country has their standarized test to give students have you ever taken one of those? I remember in elementary school when our teacher suddenly changed subjects completely and got us ready for those tests. they were manipulated. Now think what it's like in asia, probably even worse. they'll train their students for weeks just to get good scores on that test. its false
>Oh I see. You are a special snowflake who gets Ds but you are oh so smart. Like, really smart, it is just you are too lazy to get high grades. Yeah yeah, keep stroking it sperg. kek. me and another student in my class have the same grades in english. he can't even get one complete sentence together, i almost speak english fluently. everyone agrees that my english is vastly superior to his. explain that to me.
>IQ means what it is meant to test. It tests pattern recognition and puzzle solving skills Life is a puzzle, I see.
>which in turn makes it a good test for chess chess. god damn chess. what's the point of being good at chess
>Puzzle solving is very similar to problem solving and pattern recognition is very important high level maths/science. so youre saying that smart people are good at maths and science. what about artists? can those people not be smart? beethoven was believed to have a very high IQ too. do you think he was good at solving puzzles and maths? I dont think so.
>You are really good at these things but you have an IQ of 70 from all IQ tests that I have taken, my IQ varried by 40 points. very inaccurate. and it was never below 100 btw. i happen to be very good at maths
>I get my data from simple research. A good example is here: >research >googling a graph
>Also, how do you think corporations hire? You dont know how corporations hire, dont even start there
Have you ever considered that there is nothing "off" with the test but with models in which the test are based off?
Besides western models of testing taking several cues from Imperial Examinations from east asia, it's very possible that by culture/training or by genetics people can in fact become proficient at testing as if it testing was a subject in on itself.
Just like numeracy and reading if it's enforce to the point that portions of the of the population are "selected out" because they are shit at it then it stands to reason that doing the same with testing could work too. And guess which regional populations have a extensive history of testing? That's right, the east asians. So it stands to reason that they would in fact be very good at doing test since they've made it their business for over a thousand years.
Look at any top 30 ranked university. Pick any random math/physics/theoretical computer science department. Now pick a random 3rd-4th year graduate student. Now pick a random paper by them. You just found a """"genius"""". She isn't unique when you compare her to other graduate students at top programs.
>>7805183 You are clearly an Asian. You have a dog in this race so your words can't be taken seriously.
The first modern computer chip: whites The first programming language: whites The first website: whites The first Laptop, nuke, monitor, smart phone, phone, car, animation, moonlanding, calculus, missile, TV, airplane, lightbulb, movie, etc... All invented by whites. I don't know what asian propaganda you've been reading but everything of importance was invented by whites. You would have to go back very far to talk about important stuff from non-whites such as "algebra and printing" but other than that everything is invented by whites. If the IQ test were remotely important then why wouldn't asians have more contributions to the human race. They clearly out perform us whites in these "test" do they not. With all that said, I am not saying Asians aren't brilliant. I am just saying there is something flawed in our measurement systems when one race disproportionately holds claim to all of the inventions. I am of corse conveniently leaving jews out of this conversation. Jews do have the highest IQ and also the most contributions as a percentage of their population. Asians have a lot of catching up to do.
Also, don't compare asian companies or hell, even European companies to American companies. There is only one sillicon valley on this Earth. There's no company in Asia or Europe that can compete with Google, Apple, and Microsoft. The closest thing Asia has I suppose is Samesung and Sony. Meh.
>>7805183 >which is at the same level of american and european research Kekno, your output per capita is a fucking joke, it's not even 10% of American output and China has a shitton of issues in its academia with low quality paper splitting, not that the West doesn't have this issue in the soft sciences too.
>>7805282 That is true. Also, I apologize for turning this thread into stormfront 2.0, but if we are talking about IQ test then someone please explain to me how Asians beat us in IQ test yet don't have 1/10th as much contributions to mankind.
>>7805257 >top 30 Not even. I promise you you will find similar publications in any grad-school top 5% word-wide (a number in the thousands I believe). You can see this from all the third-world departmetns post in the same journals.
Blacks made a number things but the average /sci/ anon can't be ask to research them.
But that's besides anonvs point, his point which he should be using western eurasians instead just "whites" is that in proportion to IQ east asians are under performing in academic contributions which makes how we view IQ as flawed.
Which I agree with to some extent though it's more the model not test since I think the test are doing their job in "accessing" certain traits. It's just so happen it's not the ones people originally thought it was for which I've been stating for a while on /sci/.
>>7805283 Whoa, is that the best response you can muster up. You're not even going to try to bring me a list of modern inventions by asians. Okay.
Also, let's not get into a debate over Apple vs Samesung please. Apple is the hottest company on earth right now. Samsung lost the smart phone war last year and will never recover. Apple is the world's most valuable company. Market share alone doesn't tell the full story about the iPhone's success. In terms of profit from smart phones it is all Apple. It only cost them $200 to manufacture iPhones yet they sell them for $600 - $900. The iPhone alone is worth more than all of Microsoft. Apple is swimming in the doe.
>>7805282 Not really Konrad Zuse invented most of the things he listed and he could not be of a pure blooded German if he was an SS breeder baby. Looking at everything on that list it's mostly whites, calc., the inventions etc.
>>7805309 >east asians are under performing in academic contributions They're kind of underperforming in all areas. Military strength. Influence in the world. Inventions. GDP.
Someone mentioned Samsung as an example of Asia's success. A company that copied the iPhone and put an American operating system (Android) on it. Do a 360 view of whatever is in front of you right now. Literally everything is by whites. Your laptop, its processor, your operating system, your web browser, the language your computer software was coded in. All white inventions. Simply saying that Asians are falling behind is an understatement. This is just proof that test are bullshit. IQ does not show anything.
>>7805344 I think that also explains why african americans are so disproportionately bad. With slavery you had a mass migration of people. African Americans are not the descendants of people who wanted to come to America to better their lives. They are not true immigrants in that regard. African Americans have the lowest graduation attainment rates, yet Nigerians Americans have the highest graduation attainment rates. The difference is that one is an immigrant and the other is a forced-immigrant.
The Asians that are running silicon valley are 1st or 2nd generation immigrants. They are hungry for success. Anybody who is willing to migrate to a distant land to better their lives have better genetics than those who stayed behind. If you were to do an IQ test of mainland China (i.e., the poor farmers) you would get much worse results.
I'd argue the "asians are smart" is somewhat truthful but misdirected in them being "good" at math which relative to whites they are not. Engineering wise they are, testing wise they are, philosophy wise they but that's it.
Well to be fair in areas like military strength and international policies internal politics fucked them up royally.
China, Korea and Japan could have expanded themselves much farther at earlier periods in history but they didn't and it cost them dearly. Also Japan going genocide on ethnic chinese in China during ww2 didn't help either in terms of economic cooperation with east asia.
Japan may as well be considered a "western power" since it's modern alignments with countries such as Germany and America makes all their contributions beneficial to the West more than the East. Ironically enough it's also been Japan who has made the bulk of modern east asian contributions academics wise.
>>7805392 Korea would probably be on par with Japan if not for the North Korean debacle. Imagine if Japan was split in half and only the south of Japan actually contributed anything to their society. Korea has a huge handicap. Cough...communism.
Somehow this thread devolved into an argument over whether whites or Asians are superior. But here's one question I have. China's average IQ is supposedly 101. Meanwhile, India is at 82. Why is it then that there are as many high achieving Indians alive as there are those from the Chinese nation? Why is the greatest Chinese mathematician of modern times, Shiing-Shen Chern, a mental midget compared to Srinivasa Ramanujan? Something about these IQ tests is not telling the full picture.
>>7805650 >>7805656 It can be argued there's a lot of stupidity in being a math prodigy. All the work and effort it takes to get that good at math at such an early age is kind of dumb. She's probably going to regret throwing away her childhood. She'll probably end up suffering the same issues that child stars go through. Just think about it, while other girls her age were out shopping at malls and getting finger banged by older boys, she was being a "mature adult/nerd" at MIT. She will probably suffer the same mental issues that Michael Jackson went through. She'll then get sued for molesting little boys.
>>7805679 Not really, people like that adapt viewpoints about life that accommodate their choices, or lackthereof.
More likely she'll get a sort of superiority complex and only deign to get fingerbanged under the bleachers by the greatest modern poets and thespians and sexy astronauts, ect.
Michael Jackson was not very intelligent and he was an entertainer and hung out with nobody but other entertainers. Totally different mentality and subculture there.
After all, these Asian kids who are endlessly hounded by their parents to excel at everything usually don't just degenerate into weirdos. They go become the heads of HOAs and open liquor stores and make everyone else miserable.
> Michael Jackson was not very intelligent and he was an entertainer and hung out with nobody but other entertainers. Totally different mentality and subculture there. >implying the fucker had a choice
Michael Jackson was the entertainment equivalent of a child soldier, the guy had his life stolen from him at the age of 5. His father, siblings and most adults in his life turn him into a dancing puppet for money and it fucking worked like gang busters.
He was doomed from the get go, the situation with Micheal is incomparable. At least this woman and these asian kids we speak of had the illusion of choice, Michael had no choice and honestly his case is one few times I'd say the government should have stepped in and put him in a ward for his own protection.
His situation was probably the closest thing the west has had to a "modern" human sacrifice. Born to a below middle class family and died as a broken divorce multi-millionaire. Yeah blacks gain respect in mainstream entertainment, Sony, Motown and other music companies made billions off of him and the world got some good pieces of music but it required an active sacrifice.
>>7804348 >Why weren't you the next plagiarizing low IQ pleb who failed at babby's first differential geometry and was so pathetic that he married hiw own cousin /sci/? Well, I just happen to be a successful and intelligent guy.
>>7805945 At least he died as a true star. I still remember when he died. Literally everyone at uni and work was talking about it. There was probably only 3 other humans that could have died in that year that could have generated a bigger global news story (obama, the pope, ?). The sad thing is, he probably didn't even want to be a star though. That is the life that was chosen for him.
I wonder if Micheal Jackson was truly talented or if he was simply a product of his upbringing. His dad engineered him into being a star. Being a star is all he knew.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.