Hey, /sci/.

If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread images: 2

Hey, /sci/.

Been conducting some experiments in my shed out of interest, looking at how the surface tension of water changes against temperature. This is done by method of a propane torch to warm a beaker of water which is then moved into a squidgy pipette, dripped drop by drop into a cup on some scales (20 times), and then the resulting mass is weighed. I'm using the drop weight method, basically.

Looking online, it seems that the surface tension is supposed to decrease as temperature increases however my results obtained via the aforementioned method show no such correlation (pic related).

I suspect this is something to do with the changing density of the water as temperature is increased and the constant circumference where it is in contact with the pipette, but trying to work it out from first principles is just showing me what I'd expect.

Does /sci/ have any idea what could be causing this effect?

(Sorry for the shitty labelling of the graph - x axis is temp, y is surface tension, title should read "Surface Tension [math]Nm^{-1}[/math] against Temperature (Degrees C)"

>>

Ignore the result at 0,0 by the way, just me getting excel to show me the full y axis.

>>

>Does /sci/ have any idea what could be causing this effect?

A very wrong procedure. You're not accounting for heat transfer, I assume?

>>

>>7797064

Temperature is monitored in the heated beaker via a thermometer. I'm doing the pipette transfer pretty quickly so I'm taking losses due to heat to be negligible.

>>

>>7796590

>surface tension of water

>changes against temperature

This requires a delicate measurement in a carefully-controlled environment of temperature and humidity.

>>

>>7797153

I've got a shed.

Would the method with the needle and the weights be better?

>>

>>7797195

>no error bars

You could be right with big error bars. Try to evaluate the uncertainty of your method.

>>

>>7797208

Just ran the whole lot again, and the results are looking very similar. Will combine the graphs in a bit to get a proper set of results.

Got an average of 73 dyn/cm for surface tensions, with a very slight downwards trend (y=-0.1174x + 79.611).

Any idea how I could go about working out my error? The only error I can think of (instrumentally) is the scales and the thermometer. There's losses due to heat exchange but I'm not sure how to call that error.

>>

>>7797208

Standard deviation is 3.619262

>>

>>7797222

surface tension of water at 0°C: 75.64

at 100°C: 58.85

your sources of error:

-uncertainty on the size of the pipette

-uncertainty of the scale

-uncertainty on the thermometer

-uncertainty on the lost heat

In the end, you have uncertainty about the radius, the temperature and the mass.

I can't remember how this is called, but you can use this method for the total uncertainty [math]\frac{ \Delta \gamma }{\gamma} = \sqrt{\frac{ ( \Delta r }{r} )^2 + ( \frac{ \Delta m}{m} )^2 + ( \frac{ \Delta T }{T} )^2 } [/math]

(hope the latex works)

for example if you have a scale precise to 1mg, and you measure 20 drops to be 1g, then you have [math] \frac{ \Delta m}{m} = 0.001 [/math]

>>

Do you account for other things that change with temperature and affect the measurement? Like viscosities and densities?

>>

>>

Most recent graph.

>>

install R, construct linear regression

>>

>>7798139

what

>>

>>7797237

How can I work out uncertainty on lost heat?

Thread images: 2

Thread DB ID: 440168

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.

If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's