What exactly did he contribute, /sci/? Serious question, visitor

His theories opened new doors for astrology, especially in blackholes. Nowadays he's just getting paranoid about AI, as he thinks his wheelchair is gonna stab him in the back.

>>7795963
>astrology

kek

>>7795928
I'm pretty sure almost all of his work are various theories on black holes.

>>7795928
nothing. feyngold and ainsteyn are the only reputable physicists/chemists.

>>7795963
>Astrology.
GTFO OF /SCI.

>>7795928
He contributed to the Inter universal Tech-mühle theory. He was one of many. It was not invented by our civilization, nor those that came before us. It has been improved upon and passed down to each subsequent species, yet it has never been completed.

>>7795963
The chair is Stewen Hawking. It killed him years ago and now its just pretending to be him.

>>7795963
>Nowadays he's just getting paranoid about AI, as he thinks his wheelchair is gonna stab him in the back.

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/stephen-hawking-says-new-technologies-could-threaten-human-survival-n499686

Surprise, surprise.

>>7795928

He wrote a bunch of influential papers on electric wheelchair theory

>>7796140
Legend has it that he gained insight of black holes as he watched the wheels of his chair spinning

>>7795928
He's the wheelchair meme guy. We must like him because TV tells us to do so. Who cares about his scientific contributions?

>>7796057
nice one

>>7797398
lel. if that was true how would people ever find out ?

>>7795928
hawking radiation is his legacy very small short lived black holes and he dun sum other shit too

>>7795928
>>7785072
>Hawking and Mlodinow, in the chapter of their book called “The Theory of Everything,” quote Albert Einstein: “The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.” In response, Hawking and Mlodinow offer this crashing banality: “The universe is comprehensible because it is governed by scientific laws; that is to say, its behavior can be modeled.” Later, the authors invite us to give ourselves a collective pat on the back: “The fact that we human beings — who are ourselves mere collections of fundamental particles of nature — have been able to come this close to an understanding of the laws governing us and our universe is a great triumph.” Great triumph or no, none of this addresses Einstein’s paradox, because no explanation is offered as to why our universe is “governed by scientific laws.”

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-folly-of-scientism


E. is right indeed. The gap has widened in a century. hawking is just like the dawkins of physics

people think that the foremost questions in science is what is space, time, temperature, quarks and so on. No, the sole crucial and urgent question is why the humanity is able to predict [more or less] through induction , itself formalized via the rules of inferences.

[and also, why the humanity believes that to offer some mechanical model is knowledge about the world]

>>7796057
Headcanon accepted.

>>7796057
he's like the scientific version of weekend at bernie's.

>>7798181
>>7798192
Kek and double kek