Parse this statement objectively

there really isnt a point in arguing with this.

Say youre right.
nature will sort out the weak ones during war and they will die or be poor for the rest of their lives. by your very definition they shouldnt be very competitive

say youre wrong
then your just a fedora neckbeard

>>7794764
there is no world of "only artists, poets and communicators" and there's no world of "only engineers". jobs are based on need. if you remove all the "superfluous" jobs you're left with the barebones basics: agriculture, farming, basic medicine. then you can add warfare technology (blacksmithing, trained warriors), more sophisticated building methods, etc etc.

art, poetry, communication as professions have tons of stability prerequisites. maybe that means they're "purer" and more related to deep desires instead of physical need.

in any case this thread is shit, this isn't math or science and is meant to bait people in major arguments. fuck off

>>7794764
>World of only artists
>Everyone is an artist so the art market becomes really crowded
>Some artists can't support themselves with art
>They start exploring other skills to have means of economically surviving
>Some go into math, which leads into basic engineering
>In some years we have full blown engineering like today.

All you need to know is some logic to figure out how this system would sort itself out.

>>7794780
shut up inferior boi... this isnt bait, this thread will set u free