>>7793475 Not being feminist does not equate to misogyny. Misogyny is a social construct. Humans have sexual dimorphism. It's fair to say that our base instinct/animalistic nature includes men acting dominant over females in certain ways.
>>7793475 Anyone who regularly interacts with women inevitably becomes misogynist. Only blue-pilled reddit cuck manchild neckbeard virgins will deny this fact. Don't believe me? Ask Chad. He fucks a different slut every night and he knows very well how worthless they are.
> psychopathy is an evolutionary adaptation > lack of empathy for animals is an evolutionary adaptation > accepting rape is an evolutionary adaptation what the fuck are you talking about ? And what is your definition of mysogyny ?
>>7793475 Psychopathy is not an "evolutionary adaptation" but merely a feature that cannot be selected against. At least 50% of the population is psychopathic because the ability to be empathetic is encoded on the Y chromosome and thus not available to carriers of two X chromosomes.
>>7793547 Sure it does. We are mammals and we come from the animal family. And like most species of animals, we have gender roles where the male are driven to be more dominant and female are driven to be more feminine. There are tiny exceptions ofcourse but this is how it tends to work with gender relationships.
>>7793492 >Ask Chad. He fucks a different slut every night and he knows very well how worthless they are.
Chad fucks lots of women because he's horny and he can, not because he hates them. Only Supreme Gentlemen like you end up hating women for intimidating them in high school. But Chad has no grievances, real or imagined.
>>7793572 Of course he doesn't initially hate them. Of course he starts off as a horny guy. But Chad isn't dumb. After the 20th "pump and dump" one-night stand he recognizes a pattern. He sees what sluts truly are worth (i.e. nothing) and uses this knowledge of their inferiority in order to fuck more of them. Why do you think he sticks with "pump and dump"? Because he knows he's superior and they are not worth his attention outside of sex.
>>7794130 Not her(him). Just check how attractive she is. If she is super sexy and nice, she is probably a spoiled slut that get everything from men just because she is beautiful. If she is ugly then it's probably feminist who hates man because she doesn't get as much attention as the sexy ones. Just look for average girl who isn't spoiled and wants to get into normal relationship. Bonus points if she is smart and educated.
>>7794130 Feminism is only a symptom, my dear reddit friend. The true problem is the female nature. From an evolutionary point of view women were always privileged and never had any pressure on them to evolve human traits like empathy, differentiated emotions or morality. No matter how they behaved, they could always be sure to reproduce only because they have a uterus. Women are naturally born with a higher sexual market value than men. They have the vaginal monopoly and never need to adjust their behaviour or their standards.
>>7794195 It is said that the children of male partners that stood behind with females, rather than just hump them and leave, had a better chance of survival. Since these males gave their own offspring a bigger chance to contributing to the gene pool, the "empathy gene" stuck around.
Because taking care of children was a full time job, and foraging for food was no easy task.
>>7794215 The problem with that is that the exact opposite is equally effective.
When did humans develop empathy? It can be observed in primitive and social animals like wolves, so it must have been engrained into us before we gained sapience. That human became sedentary (and thus having to deal with one another) created the basics of morality, which sprung from things like religion.
Go read Hammurabi's code for a short view of what laws were like back in the bronze age. Gruesome.
>>7793475 Misogyny is a coping mechanism developed by unattractive males that never learned how to interact with women. It's like you can't afford a supercar, so you go on bitching about it's shit fuel economy and how you can't even put groceries in it.
>>7794180 >From an evolutionary point of view women were always privileged and never had any pressure on them to evolve human traits like empathy, differentiated emotions or morality. No matter how they behaved, they could always be sure to reproduce only because they have a uterus.
You just took your narrow experience with females and applied it to a whole evolution process? Man, that's some justification. That you'd do anything to get a woman, and women can freely choose you to mate (but don't) doesn't mean it works that way with more fit males.
>>7795074 Every evolutionary adaptation can be considered as a coping mechanism because they happen to better deal with new problems/situation. Also do you have any source about connection between misogyny and attractiveness? I personally have never seen anyone unattractive that does hates women, but every time I see someone talking about taking away privileges from woman, man superiority itp. they always are good looking.
>You just took your narrow experience with females and applied it to a whole evolution process? Man, that's some justification. That you'd do anything to get a woman, and women can freely choose you to mate (but don't) doesn't mean it works that way with more fit males. But what does woman choosing fit males has to do with their empathy, differentiated emotions or morality? Everyone prefers attractive partners, but it doesn't relate to >>7794180's argument in any way.
>>7795191 No, that's not what a coping mechanism is. It's a way to justify a negative experience or behaviour inconsistent with your perceived personality without destroying your ego. I'm not talking about better dealing with problems.
>But what does woman choosing fit males has to do with their empathy, differentiated emotions or morality? Exactly nothing, but my argument is that unattractive persons have skewed view of other sex, in this case lack of empathy somehow is attributed to sureness of reproductions, which is bullshit.
>>7793475 men still think that women love to be housewives, even after each girl tries to emancipate themselves as soon as she reaches 18 years of age.
men do think that women desire a real relationship, before they reach 30 years of age, and in fact, even after this age.
men slowly understands that women want entertainment and most men do not live for anything than pleasing women, to the point of men taking pride in this.
women now understand that men understand that men do not really like to be played, so women now try to sell the ''husband life'' as a progressive life, emancipating women [with the goal for women to be fucked by their lovers on the side, and the husband accepting this, being happy about this]
most men buy this, since, after all, most men are spineless and will do what women will tell them to do; this is why you see most men being pleased to change diaper.
men refuse to understand that women are better than them, so that men call women ''whores, sluts'' and men refuse to understand that there is nothing wrong with women being what they are.
men choose to cling to their fantasy where their existence is acknowledged, by women mostly, since they know that an acknowledgement from other weak men is worthless and acknowledgement from better men than them is rare, in order to avoid an angst which is well depicted in the novel the stranger. war has been the traditional way for weak men to gain a fake consistence in their life. too bad that war destroys you.
most men seek validation of their existence as a response of their action, from what they conceive as the reality, validation which is the most intense through taking women, after women have accepted them to be satisfied by them, and nowadays making women explicitly wet. these men are devoted to women. of course, most women snub most men, since women live for pleasures, being hedonistic-histrionics-egotistic but not narcissistic, which excludes, most of the time, what they consider poor or ugly men since those will never give as much pleasure to them as other men. Only the woman is able to have pleasure for pleasure itself, and she knows this. sex is what always pleases her, among other things, and the male devotees attempt to give her orgasms. impotent men attempt to give her comfort.
higher men are narcissistic --- they do not seek validation from somebody else, even less from a woman --- without being egotistic, but the woman takes this narcissism as her egotism, which thus draws her to these men; for each woman knows that her best lovers are not the puny devoted men [=robots and chads], but precisely are her fantasy of men like her, but not like her either !, which means just as egotistic as her, without being narcissistic.
the problem of the woman is that men cannot be ''egotistic without being narcissistic'' (only the woman is this). men cannot be histrionics-egotistic in fact. the problem of women is that narcissistic men are not egotistic so that they take the woman for what she is, to wit, pure (external) entertainment.
the problem of the woman is that most men are devotees and are not egotistic. those men do not seek validation from women in general; they seek validation from higher people, which they know women are above them since after all, they feel alive when they eat pussy. but those men know equally that a few men are even higher than women so that the lesser men pay respect and follow those higher men, if they meet them.
>>7793492 this seem to be the case, from speaking with more than a few chads >>7793502 possibly this >>7794180 this makes a lot of sense, sadly >>7795203 she has no idea what shes talking about. shes just had her female inferiority complex triggered so shes barking out insults veiled in pseudofacts. lol. >>7795239 >men refuse to understand that women are better than them um, yaaaaa, thats it.
Here's a fact: Female brain size is on average much smaller. Another fact: Even the most retarded of retards will believe whole heartedly that they are not retarded, and in fact very intelligent, and will defend themselves with all their strength. Just my sense: -women seem to be on average more enamoured with shiny things like jewelry, expensive cars/ decadence and consumption. They like nothing more than being pampered/comforted by men because it strokes their ego. oh well. it is what it is. I'm thinking after the collapse (brought on by geniuses like Hillary/merkel), women will be relegated once again to being property/possessions of rich men.
>>7795215 Again do you have any evidence that misogyny is result of negative experience with woman and that it's mainly developed by unattractive males? >which is bullshit. Any argument except from authority? He said that majority of woman can be sure to reproduce, but at the same time men have to keep high position in society to do it, so it might be a reason why men evolve more empathy, morality and other traits useful in society. However all you are doing is refuting by using ad hominem, this is real bullshit.
>>7795296 >Female brain size is on average much smaller. It doesn't mean much. However Females does have a little lower average IQ and they have smaller distribution, so there is more male geniuses(and retards as well) than female counterparts. >They like nothing more than being pampered/comforted by men because it strokes their ego. Thanks god for 2D girls free from this 3DPD mentality.
>>7793492 I interact regulary with women and I'm not misogynist, most of people interacts with women, (where do you live, in a cave?) and without becoming mysogynistic, Anyone who interacts with woman regulary knows that there is not a single profile for all, there are good , evil , generous, selfish, happy, sad... woman.
By the way, who is Chad? And why should be his opinion considered over the rest of population?
>>7793535 There is not only black and white. Women, men, humans in general and in other species too, there are differences between subjects. So there are men superior to some women and there are women superior to some men.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.