[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
/sci/ I beg of you for help. I spent my whole...
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

/sci/ I beg of you for help. I spent my whole evening trying to figure this out...maybe I'm a square head. Honestly, I know it's somtehing with logarithms...but I have no idea how to solve it. Really I used a lot of papers...can anyone please help me?
>>
>>7790657
X=0
Try to study the variations of 4^x + 2^-x and of 2-x^2 to show this solution is unique
>>

x=0 is the only solution. To see this, try graphing both the left side (which is concave up with a minimum at x=0) and the right side (which is concave down with a maximum at x=0). So the two graphs can intersect at only the point (0,2), so the only solution is x=0.
>>
>>7790684
>solve by graphing

u a shit senpai desu
>>
>>7790765
Shit I forgot that it's (2 - x^2) on the right hand side. Oh well you get the idea.
>>
>>7790767
I wouldn't graph it but it helps give OP, at his level, a nice way to see why 0 is the only solution.
>>
>>7790800
>Implying that if he were to graph it infinitely he wouldn't find infinitely many alternative solutions