Confidence interval bullshit

Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread images: 2

Anonymous

Confidence interval bullshit 2016-01-16 21:28:49 Post No. 7788773

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

Confidence interval bullshit 2016-01-16 21:28:49 Post No. 7788773

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

Let's assume I have a relatively large sample (500) from an unknown distribution. I can calculate sample mean and variance, can I calculate confidence intervals for them? I've googled and found that because of the central limit theorem it should somehow work out for the mean (what distribution would I use in the formula tho? Normal? T?)

What about variance?

Pls help?

Also stats thread or whatever.

>>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem

First. Fucking. Sentence.

>>

>>7788853

kek.

I think you misunderstand the meaning of the CLT.

>>

>>7788853

Relax, if I understood everything I've read I wouldn't post here, would I? I'm shit at stats (and don't really understand confidence intervals), so I was hoping someone could explain this to me. Clearly, you're not the person for the job?

>In probability theory, the central limit theorem (CLT) states that, given certain conditions, the arithmetic mean of a sufficiently large number of iterates of independent random variables, each with a well-defined expected value and well-defined variance, will be approximately normally distributed, regardless of the underlying distribution

Okay, so how does that answer my question? From this I can learn that the average value is approximately normal if I have a large enough sample. Is that sufficient enough reason to use the z table? What about variance/standard deviation?

>>

>>7788773

students t distribution?

>>

>>7788889

Your problem, as you already realize, is that you know nothing about the distribution of the population from which your sample has been selected. Google bootstrapping. You're welcome...

>>

>>7788889

>Is that sufficient enough reason to use the z table

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution

First two paragraphs.

Step your game up senpai.

>>

>>7788899

For the variance/deviation? Why not chi square?

>>

Why does everyone here always kick up dust when they can't answer simple questions succinctly? Even if you knew what you're talking about, you're not going to impress some beginner who can't even into CIs with nuanced arguments about assumptions...

Use a t-test because you don't know the population standard deviation.

>>

File: Screenshot from 2016-01-16 23:48:39.png (22 KB, 1211x388)
Image search:
[iqdb]
[SauceNao]
[Google]

22 KB, 1211x388

>>7788946

>t-test

Fucking thank you. You mean Student's t distribution, not t-test (I don't want to test hypotheses), I presume?

Am I to assume these formulas I've found are incorrect?

>>

God I hate statistics. So fucking boring! Thank God I don't have to deal with that shit anymore. Thanks for bringing back the memories and ruining my mood OP!

>>

>>7788993

Misery loves company.

Thread images: 2

Thread DB ID: 433988

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.

If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's