Why are economists so bad at their job? Why are psychics so bad at their job? Why are astrologers so bad at their job? Why are psychoanalysts so bad at their job? Why are X* so bad at their job? >*not a real job
>>7788506 because tulpas and because they can't take EE approach to problems.
Lets say i want to analyze cellular modem, right? I know it operates at specific clock speed. I know there are some stages with Amps, filters, ADC, de/multiplexers, checking checksums, clock recovery etc. And i want to know how does it work either by measuring heat dispassion, or by sampling signal (with 2f sample rate) in random points.
This what neuroscientists are currently trying to do, and why at this stage it's a huge waste of money.
Basically same reason, why people obsess over neural networks
>>7789913 If everyone is bad at their job it should be okay to ask why they are bad at it. Maybe op just wants to know why neuroscientists specifically are bad at their job. The other ones being bad is for another time.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.