Probability

Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread images: 1

Anonymous

Probability 2016-01-11 17:03:43 Post No. 7776195

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

Probability 2016-01-11 17:03:43 Post No. 7776195

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

/sci/ by my most recent calculations I have determined that the odds of winning the powerball are the same as flipping heads about 28 times in a row. Let's have a probability thread!

There's also a question I've been pondering. They tell me that the intersection of independent probabilities is equivalent to the multiplication of those probabilities.

Why the hell is this the case? I just see people spouting this definition. I've never seen a proof.

>>

The simplest proof is to use a combinatoric tree. Suppose you have a coin, what's the probability of tossing it twice and getting heads both times? The first toss has 2 possibilities (heads or tails), then each of these tosses has two branches for the second toss (again, heads or tails). The total sample space is therefore 4. Heads, heads, represents one event out of the 4. Hence probability =1/4 or 1/2 * 1/2

>>

What is interesting is that although you may think having the lottery numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 has just as much chance as any other combination, in fact because it is a run of consecutive numbers it is a far less likely outcome

>>

>>7776271

Is this true? How so?

>>

>Why the hell is this the case?

Because that's what it *means* for two variables to be independent.

>>7776307

>Is this true?

No. The payoff on that sequence may be lower than average because it's picked by a disproportionally large amount of people, but the odds of the combination happening is the same as for all other combinations.

>>

>>7776202

>The simplest proof is to use a combinatoric tree

Retarded CS majors don't belong here

>>

>>7776271

That is not true whatsoever.

>>7776195

>They tell me that the intersection of independent probabilities is equivalent to the multiplication of those probabilities.

This is like the very basis of probability. 12-year-olds understand this. If you don't understand this, then you know literally nothing about probability.

>>

>>7776195

Event 1 happens A different ways out of B total different ways

Event 2 happens C different ways out of D total different ways

Events 1 and 2 are independent, so one has no effect on the other happening simultaneously. Therefore the probability of them happening simultaneously is the number of ways they can happen simultaneously divided by the total different ways:

(A*C) / (B*D)

Thread images: 1

Thread DB ID: 432442

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.

If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's