ITT: We pretend we're /sci/ in 1890

Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread images: 10

Anonymous

ITT: We pretend we're /sci/ in 1890 2016-01-04 19:49:07 Post No. 7762113

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

ITT: We pretend we're /sci/ in 1890 2016-01-04 19:49:07 Post No. 7762113

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

>atoms and molecules are discrete "particles" made of...uh, stuff

What a fucking quack. In 126 years he is going to be remembered as an example of extreme stupidity in academia.

>>

>go to rocklab

>smash 2 rocks together

>get smaller rock

>smash smaller rock with smaller rock

>get pebble

>smash pebble together

>pebble no break

Ooga booga! pebble am elementary particle!

>>

>>7762120

I, too, read SMBC :^)

>>

>>7762113

>muh aether clouds!

STFU Kelvin. I bet you didn't even understand the H-theorem. Faggot.

>>

Those Michelson and Morley guys are rustling my jimmies, how can the speed of light be the same relative to everyone it makes no darn sense

>>

>>7762113

[math]

\frac{\partial (\rho u_{i})}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial[\rho u_{i}u_{j}]}{\partial x_{j}} = -\frac{\partial p}{\partial x_{i}} + \frac{\partial \tau_{ij}}{\partial x_{j}} + \rho f_{i}[/math]

Well guys I think we're fucking done here. Good work. Yeah it's nonlinear but it should only take the boys in the math department a few more years to get some general solutions.

>>

You hear about that asshole Planck? Couldn't get his data to fit any curve until he just made up some number he named after himself. What a cunt.

>>

>>7762131

kek

>>

>>7762113

Hey /sci/, no aether guy here...

>>

Who /machian physics/ here?

This guy is a fucking genius. There's no way someone can overshadow him.

>>

>>7762159

funny thing though (to speak a word of true trivia in this thread), he called it "h" for "Hilfskonstante" in this sense, i.e. "helping constant"

In my notes I consider it a unitless constant pretty consistency, i.e. equate Joule and Hertz and it makes most formulas much easier to read

>>

>tfw [math]\mathbb R^n[/math] has the power of the continuum

>>

Hey guys, so we know that light travels at like 300 000 km/s right? Well what would happen if I was going this fast and pointed a lamp backwards? Would someone else see it as a stationary object?

>>

>>7762113

GUYS GUYS

A POINTWISE LIMITS OF CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS IS NOT NECESSARILY CONTINUOUS

HOLY FUCKING SHIT MAÎTRE CAUCHY WAS WRONG

WHAT A MONGOLOÏD WANKER

>>

>>7763638

Would someone see light as a stationary object? No, that's impossible.

>>

>>7763626

Haha, thou codpiece

>>

>>7763638

Why is everyone trying to relate light to electromagnetism?? They're not even the same thing. Don't tell me you believe that bullshit "electromagnetic wave" thing Hertz is babbling about.

>>

Im dying of tuberculosis, /sci/. So much for the life sciences and modern medicine. You fell for the meme degree

>>

>>7763638

You can't go at c.

As you approached it, someone on earth would see the light of the lamp extremely redshifted (maybe even in the radio spectrum).

On a side note, would we see the spaceship slowed down? Every second we would see the spaceship move by 0.5 light seconds instead of 1, because it takes 0.5 s for the light to travel the 0.5 light seconds the spaceship travelled before.

>What did I get wrong?

>>

>>7762131

Get to discretize it and code it to my compu... Crap i have not created it!

>>

>>7762113

Prepare to get btfo .

>>

>>7762113

Matter is made up of fields, not particles.

Fields are what reality is made of, particles are what you see when you "look" at the fields.

What is light..? Wave, particle? Both?

It's a wave on a field.

>>

Quarternions are the greatest mathematical breakthrough since fucking complex numbers. I swear to god in the future people will only use quarternions as ground fields for everything, just wait and see.

>>

By now it's pretty obvious to anyone with a brain and a stake in mathematics' future that the theory of real numbers does not work

Modern pure mathematics is an infinitist hoax that encourages non-rigorous thinking and imprecise definitions such as "algebraic number fields" and "complex numbers".

We must save mathematics from this so-called "axiom of choice" by returning to constructivist finitism. With this, we will bring increased rigour, an increased role for number theory and a more combinatorial, finite approach to topology.

>>

Can you believe that rube actually attended an institute of higher learning just to learn how to operate a glorified music box?

How foolish can these lowly computers be? Do they actually think that they have the same training as a scholar of mathematics or even an average gymnasium student?

>>

>>7764208

Please this is really bothering me

>>

>>7764278

Pfft, look at this nujob. Probably a fucking undergrad.

>>

>>7764305

>gymnasium

Hei svenske. :^)

>>

>>7764278

Nigga u high af

>>

>>7764208

Yes

>>

>thought the thread said 1980

>was confused as fuck the whole time

I guess a poor commoner like me cannot read well. Must I go back to the watering hole.

>>

File: fd6bdfd576ecef45a8a0adaaca33ac31.jpg (39 KB, 506x800)
Image search:
[iqdb]
[SauceNao]
[Google]

39 KB, 506x800

Verily I say towards this community and its outstanding contribution to the sciences; apropos, have you all seen my knickers?

>>

take a look at this neanderthal.

>muh fields

>muh electromagnetism

>>

The sun is actually a giant piece of hot metal that moves across the sky. Cold metal can still be the same hot metal, but the hot metal increases with volume, that is, it's mass/volume is decreased. So it's safe to assume that the reduction of mass over a column of air infers the sun is actually a really, really hot piece of metal.

Thread images: 10

Thread DB ID: 377792

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.

If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's