Can someone explain me, why a machine like the one in the picture does not work?
I know the law that energy can not be created, please dont tell me that. Science isnt about following rules, it is about finding new ones, right?
Even if these machines dont work, they should work for a limited amount of time right? Why not? It is powered by gravity, which is seemingly some kind of infinite force(i somehow know that that probably is not correct, sorry for my lack of knowledge).
If we connect it with a generator, people say that the its resistance will stop the machine. But there already is the friction of the machine itself! Couldnt we just build it bigger so that the resiatance of the generator becomes less relevant?
Please dont see this as some kind of conspiration theory or whatever, I just want to understand why exactly it does not work.
Count the number of balls on the left and the right. There are fewer on the left and they are farther out. There are more on the right and they aee closer to the middle. I think if you add all of the torques, the wheel is balanced.
>It is powered by gravity, which is seemingly some kind of infinite force
Found your problem right here, Opie.
Gravity isn't a power source, it's like a spring, or a battery.
You can only get out energy that's put in somewhere else.
Even a mill water-wheel is just getting back energy put into the system when sunshine evaporates water, causing it to rise up into the atmosphere.
Inventor failed to take rotary motion of the balls into account. Speeding up their spin and then stopping it consumes energy which is dissipated as heat when they stop (hit the wall).
Other than that they travel up the same distance as down, so net energy gain is zero.
they do but they look a bit different
how the hell fusion physics come up with such awesome names for their stuff. Tokamak, Stellator.
Cyclotron, betatron have nothing on it. And space stuff? ISS, SSME? Well, maybe Falcon, Saturn, but they really have nothing on Stellator.
because the machine is as awesome as the name
The whole point that stupid niggers like you are missing is that you can't get energy out of something just moving. That's right, even though generators spin, that's not all they do. Generating electricity, powering a mill, etc. produces reaction forces that tend to slow down your stupid balanced, frictionless spinning wheel.
You have to put in a bit of energy to start it spinning from a stop, and then you get that energy out when you hook the generator up to it. Nothing more. Real generators are constantly forced to spin by water, explosions, whatever, and the energy from this is that comes out the other end as electricity.
Any passive contraption is, at best, a convoluted frictionless flywheel. If you do the math to figure out the amount of force you get from falling balls, you will find that it's equal to the force you need to raise the other ones up.
I imagine you are trying to generate energy from said device. Let's go with electricity. Once a generator or alternator starts...well, generating, it creates a load, which is friction that cannot be stopped by putting it in a vacuum or whatever.
>Even if these machines dont work, they should work for a limited amount of time right? Why not? It is powered by gravity, which is seemingly some kind of infinite force(i somehow know that that probably is not correct, sorry for my lack of knowledge).
It will work for some amount of time and stops after all the energy you gave it in the first spin will be used to move air, emit sounds, heat up hinge etc. It's not powered by gravity, it's powered by you if you spin it first, otherwise it won't move at all.
>If we connect it with a generator, people say that the its resistance will stop the machine. But there already is the friction of the machine itself! Couldnt we just build it bigger so that the resiatance of the generator becomes less relevant?
In perfect world, you would get as much energy from generator as you put into the machine. It would be more efficient to just spin generator on your own though.
I fucking hate this. Why do women shout that they should be treated as equals when they make a big fucking deal of just studying physics? No one in the physics department cares if you have a vagina or that you don't look like a failed abortion. If you say you are a special snowflake people ar not going to treat you the same.
Kek you got me, but you know what I mean.Bill Nye was really neutral in his show and tried to inspire both male and female kids, this girl has that feel that gamur gurls give making a big fucking deal about being girl and into physics. i've encountered many of these cunts who actually do not take physics seriously or with a great deal of passion.
Don't worry i'm a retard and i have perfect explenation of this phenomenon
>you fap, hand gets tired, you lose energy, result you can't fap forever
>mobile spins, get tired, lose energy, stops
So you are socially awkward. You don't understand why her outburst of physics is separate from butt friction. The initial outburst was an inb4 while friction was an elaboration I the concept.
Left alone, a type 2 machine will accelerate until some limiting action kicks in,
else contraption disintegrates.
No it does not work at all. Yes if you spin it, it will spin until it stops spinning just like any other wheel. If you don't spin it it will not start by itself. It will not spin better than if it didn't have that retarded design. The balls on the left are farther out. On the right there are more balls.
Perpetual motion machines are impossible. Gravity is a conservative vector field. If you want to make things up and not have to follow the rules you should get into the soft "sciences" or humanities.