Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 94. page

>>9139479
Write your own papers and when someone steals something you worked hard on and took for granted come back and tell me you don't care.

Let me just submit your PhD thesis when your half complete and claim it's mine! :D

Who is EY?

File: pepe-the-frog-meme-10.jpg (39KB, 438x438px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 438x438px

>>9139462
∞+i

Cantor's diagonal proof tells us that not all infinities are equal and that some are bigger than others, this is not contradictory.

>>9139462
>How can there be schemes and axioms that count beyond infinity?
They aren't counting, so there aren't.

>>9139422
It's both. It either is or it isn't.

bump pls

>>9139422
Depends on context, but radians is standard in mathematics.

>>9139386
Here's a trivial pattern:
given two pared whole positive integers x and y
if x + y = a power of 2
then your procedure it will end at (0, a power of 2 )

Sum is invariant and finite
Process is markov (each term in the sequence depends only on the term immediately before it)
By pigeonhole principle the sequence will always loop in at most min(x,y) steps where x,y are your starting numbers.
Also if x,y -> z,v then y,x -> v,z

Algebra problem, How the hell do i solve this

Fiora starts riding her bike at 24 mi/h. After a while, she slows down to 15 mi/h, and maintains that speed for the rest of the trip. The whole trip of 60.75 mi takes her 3 h. For what distance did she travel at 24 mi/h?

>>9139371
>What do you think about this guy and what he said?
A fraud and most of his "theories" don't stand up to scrutiny since he was too much of a brainlet to use the scientific method.

BRICK IN YO FACE!
NOW WHATCHA GONNA DO WIDDIT!

...He liked blow.

>>9139371
>Is it wrong to take him seriously?
On many subjects, very.

>Why?
Most of his methods are downright subjective and simply not very scientific at all. There are better mind models nowadays.

It's the fucking definition.

>>9139382
It is?

>>9139365
its just from how V and momentum is defined, you could redefine the fields in such a way that there is no minus, but then some other equations will get a negative in it.

>>9139334
Considering that med school students study 2-3 hours per day for 4 years, probably not.

you answered your own question op. you can start by looking up the curriculum for different med programs, and pirate the textbooks. i feel in a helpful mood so try Library Genesis, it's still the best source for text piracy but beware that some of the links might be fishy. the other things you can do are: get a library account, rent e-books and strip DRM, or purchase digital textbooks from amazon, strip the DRM and return immediately for a refund. some material might be available from MOOCS but less so the further up you go - you might have a hard time finding a bazillion white papers without JSTOR or whatever.

>>9139334
>is there a way to self-study medicine?
yeah, read the shitty books

>if i spend 30 min a day can I learn at least the theory part in 10 years?
no

Keep in mind that this isn't low Earth orbit where high velocity space debris is flying around. Things are alot more stable in geostationary orbit.

>>9139329
The first one drifts apart so slowly, looks like a fairly low energy event to me.

>Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action.

>>9139275
>assuming pi at some point (after trillions of digits for example) began to loop back and repeat the same sequence of digits as naseum
Then it would be rational, but it's not.

>>9139275
>durrrrrrrrr

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_that_%CF%80_is_irrational

File: CIYvAwHWIAAqLZH.png (248KB, 418x457px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 418x457px

Is pi embedded in the digits of pi?

>>9139197
OP here, the website thinks the GoFundMe link is spam lol, here is an official website about it: http://utahraptors.utahpaleo.org/

>>9139198
If they took Paypal, I'd have just donated.

Unless I forget , I'll do something later when I have my wallet.

>>9139381
OP here, good stuff, make sure to share with others! (side note: not affiliated with this in any way, no financial ties, just really like utahraptors!)

>"climate change"
Fiction belongs on >>>/lit/

>>9139180
TO BE FAIR...it's not JUST about climate change. That's only like 1 chapter.

shameless self bump

>>9139164
placebo + heat exhaustion + LARPing.

im not even joking

>>9139168
>LARPing
this mostly

people will retardedly do just about anything to fit in with the crowd.

Why do we teach the quotient rule when the product rule exists?

>>9139181
It's good for students to see how all the rules are consistent with each other - the quotient rule can be proved directly, without relying on the product and chain rules (though, arguably, teaching product -> chain -> quotient-as-a-bonus is probably a better progression. The chain rule is very important, and should be covered earlier than it often is in a calc class). I do think that the quotient rule should probably be treated as a "bonus" of sorts, not a fundamental rule - but it shouldn't be skipped altogether.

Also, the quotient rule often (but not always) brings expressions closer to simplification.

What always gets me, though, is when people use the quotient rule to differentiate something like [math]\frac{2}{x + 1}[/math].

Because law isn't and can't be a hard science. It has to be internally consistent but it's otherwise predicated by ethics. Sometimes ambiguity is a feature and removing it to favor one interpretation over another is little more than moral judgment. This is a question for the philosophers, not computer scientists.

>>9139088
fpbp

>>9139088
you's still gettin a robot lawyer in ten years jaykwan

OP is a faggot, enjoys dicks in his ass, and is a pro at sucking cock.

Thank you for the $111

>>9139047
Truer words have never been spoken

This sentence is false.