Sooo, what happens to the oil and gas industry when fusion finally breaks through? That's like a trillion dollar industry.
>>8718897
jews sabotage the reactors again and then whine about how unsafe it is.
>>8718897
very little. hydrocarbon fuels would still be safer, cheaper, and more importantly, portable. not to mention all the chemical applications (plastics, lubricants, cosmetics, etc).
>>8718897
What if fusion never breaks through?
>to distinguish between 0 and O, put a diagonal line through 0
>" " " 1 and l, put a solid line below 1
>" " " 7 and T, put a solid line through the middle of 7
>" " " 2 and Z, put a solid line through Z
>" " " 5 and S, ???
why is there nothing for 5 and S?
Same goes for + and t.
Nobody's done anything about this
You forgot about 9 and g.
>>8718636
>>8718636
>confusing 7 with T
>study computer science
>get job as a data analyst using machine learning and neural networks
>starting salary is $18k rising to a cap of $32k after 5 years
WTF /sci/ I thought that machine learning and neural networks is in high demand by employers. Why is the pay so shit then?
>>8718431
Salary heavily depends on area
Does anybody know how to properly translate $ wages to € wages.
If one looks at the average wages here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average_wage
we have
US:
$ 60k
Germany
$ 45k or roughly € 42k
any of course living price is very different (higher in the US)
But this still doesn't reflect differences in well-paying jobs. If you look at glassdoor and e.g. the highest paying senior jobs at Google
in the US they make
155.000$
and in Europe about
110.000€
a year (8000€ a month)
The average PhD + 3 years salary in Europe will be under 65000€, which isn't that high in the US.
AND then the income taxes in Germans pay 40%!? Doesn't seem to add up, even with the higher living cost in the US.
What's going on here?
I'm French and am starting a job at a US tech company with an office in my city.
It's well paid in terms of salary, but then there is also the bonus thing - those kind that are related to shares. I get some with the contract.
Can someone explain this properly?
It's a young company and the HR woman said she herself couldn't even judge properly how much money these bonuses would really mean.
And then there is the thing of "selling it on the market".
Would you date an engineer?
Hardmode: no nuclear or aerospace engineer
>>8718273
What's up with that .gif?
Anyways, I would if grill or girl (male) like Hime.
>>8718273
Who is this semen demon?
>>8718278
Ninomiya Rui from Gatchman Crowds
>inb4 spoonfeeding
We are not on /a/
Why are engineers here treated better than Computer Scientists?
You guys understand that engineers are not scientists right?
Shame on all of you
>>8718231
>computer science
>science
>>8718231
Because engineering is even more tedious than CS.
>>8718231
Engineers are not scientists nor "computer scientists" are, but at least engineers don't lie by calling themselves scientists
So other than doing it for the science and all, could a Mars colony actually be profitable?
>>8717203
with the proper systems in place,over time, of course.
Well Earth has limited natural resources and Mars has more of some of them, so eventually the demand for those resources will be high enough that it's worth colonising it to mine em or whatever. No idea what the timeframe is though; I doubt it's within our lifetime. Raises the question of what the minimum amount of people and stuff to send to Mars to allow it to develop a colony that can build a way back and collect resources is. Reminds me of Factorio
I think a more interesting idea is at what point a pre-existing Martian colony (established for science or whatever) could turn a profit by exploiting Martian resources and shipping them back to Earth. Space tourism could also be a pretty big factor.
Given that high-end art connoisseurs on our planet currently routinely shell out 100 million dollars on single paintings, I would fully expect that if an artisan craftsman went to mars, forged a steel sword from Martian iron or carved a handsome piece of sculpture from martian marble ,and put it up for sale, that people would spend seemingly absurd amounts of money to get a hold of it.
That could help a great deal in the early years. someone send Damien hirst to mars, rich people love giving that guy money.
I stole a textbook from my school. I got away with it. Have you stole textbooks?
I was going to call you a nigger, but even they aren't low enough to steal textbooks
>>8716970
I just photocopy them.
Have every single one but only handful are worth the paper they are printed on.
>>8716989
paper costs 4 cents a page and I get 400 page free print quota. 800 pages worth of textbook printing o each page.
I need to start doing this.
Are mathematicians all genuinely autistic?
No, seriously. Who gives a fuck if 1729 is the smallest number that can be written as the sum of two cubes two different ways?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YysNM2JoFo
I'm all for math, don't get me wrong. It's really important for real work like physics and engineering, but the people who dedicate every second to this shit must be pathetic.
>>8716422
Just have fun yo
>>8716444
thread
>>8716422
>Who gives a fuck if 1729 is the smallest number that can be written as the sum of two cubes two different ways?
Number theorists care. If you are not a number theorist then you shouldn't care.
Why do number theorists care? Because the job of a number theorists is to prove theorems about the numbers. Now, you may be telling yourself that "1729 is the smallest number such that..." is not a "real" theorem and you would be right, so why do they care about little statements like that? Simple.
How do you advance number theory? How do you decide which new theorem could be true and therefore deserves your time and effort to investigate it? Well, simple. By having a list of facts about numbers.
What facts? Any fact. Anything goes because the next big theorem could be hidden in ANY statement. Number theorists care about the random facts that show the structure of numbers.
For the 1729 thing there are many things that could be asked. For example: What characteristic of the natural numbers makes it so that no number smaller than 1729 can be written as the sum of two cubes in two different ways?
What is the answer to that question. Well, now we know. We know that numbers that have that property must also satisfy certain properties outlined here:
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL6/Broughan/broughan25.pdf
And if you assume a number less than 1729 has those properties then you will soon reach a contradiction.
And how did that author "discover" that theorem? Probably by studying 1729 and the numbers that follow it and finding what they have in common.
And now you may be saying "okay okay, but why do you care about these theorems"
Well, simple. To find those theorems we
GET PAID
E
T
P
A
I
D
So how come you guys are still denying scientific facts?
>>8716192
Frugivores are a subset of Omnivores. There for all frugivores are also omnivores who just so happen to eat a lot of fruit. Kill yourself vegfag.
>>8716196
Because Hunter Gatherers with spears and shit built huge civilizations by risking life and limb to hunt large prey in the wild... Riiighhhtt
I mean, it wasn't the farming and relying on storable food grains that built massive civilizations.... right???
We Wuz Kangz too?
>>8716213
What the hell are you talking about? I'm pretty certain there was some domestication at some part in human history. Don't reply to me or any of my posts ever again.
Dear Gentlmen,
I am currently wiriting on my master thesis and have a major problem concerning my OLS regression.
The results are contrary to the scientific literature and I think it is because the variables have no lineare relation. Maybe someone knows how to transform the following graphs to get a more linear relationship.
>>8715795
Well try exponential
How advanced would we be now if the dark ages didn't exist?
>>8715544
>People still unironically post this graph.
Either give me the units of "scientific advancement" or kill yourself.
>>8715544
The dark ages must exist for they shown our mistakes, and we as a species have learned from them. We cannot advance without first making the mistake.
>>8715548
Here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale
If I remember correctly... we are around 0.7
How do we know that atoms aren't made out of other smaller particles?
>>8714665
We do know that. We've known it for like 100 years now, you've never heard of protons or neutrons?
>>8714665
They are
>>8714665
Please be a troll
>wasting 4 years of his life and putting himself in tens of thousands of dollars of debt to get a STEM degree
>not just applying yourself to a good /sci/ related trade
what the fuck is wrong with you?
>>8714582
Science IS my trade. A Ph.D is essentially the modern equivalent of a medieval apprenticeship.
>implying i didn't get a scholarship
>>8714582
I did my undergrad in Canada, which in total cost me roughly $8,000. Now I've been accepted at MIT for grad school, and not only are they paying my tuition, but I get a $30,000 stipend. Nothing is wrong with me.
This image has no red pixels.
Explain this shit to me /sci/, how exactly does our brain infer color from shape?
hierarchical bayesian inference
>>8713094
I was gonna say bullshit, but then I did check those colors in paint and can't find any red. Weird.
This just proves how extraordinary The Mind Of God Is.
Define red. Red to us isnt one wavlength. Human eye is pretty insensitive to different wavelengths in that part of the spectrum.
this a thread for anything related to botany. mycology is also welcome for discussion. what is everyones thought on trying to create perennial wheat
wouldn't the ensuing parasite and disease burden make it obsolete?
>>8711905
that is a good point but i think we would be able to keep those things away with a little effort
Agroecology guy will talk ITT later