Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 782. page

>>8729191
Depends.

Job pls

Cool. I was actually asked this question in separate interviews by Apple, then later by Lab126 (Amazon).
The conceptual answer is: this problem can be understood by considering a sufficiently small fluid element at the surface of the water in the glass. That tiny sub-volume of water experiences two forces: 1) gravitational force pulling down on that small mass of water; 2) the force of centripetal acceleration acting upon that small mass of water. When viewed in the (rotating) reference frame of that tiny volume of water under study, the centripetal force is a side-acting force and the gravitational is downward acting. The surface of the water will change to a shape that is NORMAL to the resultant vector of those two forces. Holding rotational freq constant, the water angle will get steeper as its radial location on the record player increases, because the centripetal force is proportional to radius multiplied by the SQUARE of the angular frequency. It can be shown that the water will take on the shape of a sub-portion of the surface of a PARABOLA centered with its minima at the center axis of the record player. As the angular frequency increases, the glass will either slide, or it will tip over, and which of these depends on the aspect ratio of the glass (position of COG) and the friction between the glass and the record player. Some water could splash out prior to either of those events, if the glass was nearly filled with water before the water angle started to change when the turntable started spinning

Downward acting gravitational force: F = m X g
Side acting centripetal force: F= (omega^2) X r, where omega is angular freq in rad/s
If THETA = the tangential angle of the water relative to the plane of the record player, then:
TAN (Theta) = (omega^2) r / g

Interviewers often give major credit if candidate can at least get CONCEPTUAL answer correct.

>>8729191
The arm of the record player hits the glass and knocks it over.

>>8728481

It's basically a giant fuel depot that might also have the ability to make vehicle components (ie anything out of steel). This is so because the Moon has low gravity with no atmosphere, allowing things to be easily put into orbit around it. NASA also thinks a Lunar space elevator is feasible with modern materials, and such a thing would easily make the Moon the place where interplanetary rockets are made.

Only issue is that the value of the Moon isn't really unlocked until we start building massive spaceships or cargo for spaceships that go on other planets which is probably a thing that won't happen within our lifetimes except maybe as a proof-of-concept.

File: 1427663130461.png (86KB, 244x252px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 244x252px

>>8728481
Why do people post these terrible composite images?

>>8728510
It doesn't seem too terrible, until you try to figure out where the sun is supposed to be.

[Continued]
Also:
http://www.bioinitiative.org/

It is time. Li-Fi can replace wi-fi, something can possibly be done for cell phones and all the other little toys too. I'm tired of dealing with this asinine nonsense. The effect of their use goes completely against people's purported value system. It's intellectual dishonesty and addict behavior.

Indeed, it actually looks quite legit. But I'm wondering about the scale and significance of these interactions. Is it full-blown and very significant to the level of smoking a few cigarettes per day? Or is it like a cigarette a week? Or a month?

Alas, I thought this was not something to worry about. Thank you.

Are wired PCs and smartphones a worry?

By being attracted the largest possible pool of things, it makes it more likely to impragnate more women.

For example, imagine a situation where your ancestor lives in a tribe where there are 3 sexy women, 2 ugly women, and 1 trap. If he has very specific tastes he will only fuck 3 of them and have 3 kids, but if he has very broad tastes he will fuck all 6 of them and have 5 kids. It's okay that he fucked the trap because it doesn't really make a difference either way.

It makes sure all your inferior sperm drown in someones ass instead of a vagina

File: 1487807537124.jpg (87KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 600x600px

It doesn't

File: images.duckduckgo.com.jpg (9KB, 246x247px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 246x247px

20.000 USD per semester

pic very related

>>8727520
>The Land of the Free claims another victim

>>8727520
At least it's not the most expensive university in the world.

52k per year here

nothing, it isnt difficult you fucking brainlet

>>8726891
Can you elaborate on why you think CS isn't difficult? I think you're the brainlet and want to better understand your incorrect thinking.

>>8726884
I heard ~30% of students never fully grasp the concept of assignment.

File: 02f.jpg (34KB, 655x527px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 655x527px

We have people send us incredible sources every day, countless anonymous individuals who feel a strong passion for defending personal liberties. We have amazing sources because we don't give the sources up.
We've been to the moon, but it was sort of a "front broadcast" to hide the technology that we actually have. The technology is hard to imagine. The elites may have spoken with inter-dimensional beings to acquire mathematical equations for atomic bombs well over 170 years ago. The theatre we see is just that, theatre. They want to control the narrative of technological progression. But have I seen "little green men"? Absolutely not.

>>8726843
I guess that's why he says he feels heavier everyday

>>8726843
Yes with Alex its 70% false 30% true. He put it out there himself that's how he's able to exist within the machine. People need to be able to connect the dots themselves.

How complex is this supposed magnetic device?

What would something like that look like?

Where would atmosphere come from?

>posts stupid pop-sci article on /sci/

saged

>>8729574

*in general

>>8729574
I'm interested in this.
Asking a professor you like wouldn't hurt, I guess.

You missed the deadline for the mathematics REU's this year, but you should be able to hit them up next year. Google them.

>>8728006
No, measurement does

>>8728009
Does Schrodinger's equation explain this phenomenon?

>>8728006
No.

>>8728010
No.

Next questions.

>>8727829
To give predators a chance to keep us humble.

Nobody knows, but it seems to have to do with how the brain processes memory

>>8727829
Cause I'm tired nigga

File: 1483720505997.jpg (30KB, 720x438px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 720x438px

>>8727514
3 words you fucking mong:
GIT GUD

1. Read more
2. Think more
3. Apply more
4. Repeat

>>8727514

what this
>>8728034
guy said, except you also have to constantly be coming up with new ways to learn better and faster, so that you learn exponentially. otherwise it'll take too long.

just constantly, constantly, constantly challenge yourself.

>>8719329
>For me it would be whether the Riemann hypothesis has been solved

Yes, it was!

>C-can I see the proof?

Indeed! We all have genetically enhanced 90000000000000 IQ brains so you can just read the statement of the Riemann Hypothesis and then immediately prove it.

Oh wait. You weren't genetically modified before being born? Lol too bad you braincuck. TOP KEK. Everyone, look at this fucking brainlet. Can't even prove the Riemann Hypothesis! Even little kids can do that HAHAHAHAHAHAH

File: 1a6d53346670aa2f8e24266ab25384f6.jpg (52KB, 500x357px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x357px

why the fuck am i alive.

>2017
>3000
>983 years
>FML
>pic unrelated

>first post not sexbots

Sexbots where

asked cleo on stack exchange

>>8727634
I believe it relates to the Gamma function.

something with n! = n*(n-1)!
at least ??

I might be

>>8729079
Why do you think this?

Every time we solve a captcha we're contributing to AI.