How do I get "d" on one side of the equation?
Put it in a computer.
>>8760899
And without a computer?
>>8760892
If d is small with respect to the denominator then just expand shit niqqa
>dont fap for 3 days
>only dream of fucking girls
>wake up to my hand being on my dick
>become more and more depressed
>cant even think
>can't do anything but look at porn
Why? Why am I cursed with this organ that can control my mind?
>>8760452
your a slave to it because of evolution
>>8760452
>lacking self control
>>8760452
you can solve this problem right now
you've seen some of those veterinarian shows on tv, right?
just grab a hammer and place your balls on the table
you know what to do next
Is black science man really this dense?
>>8760167
Yes.
>>8760167
"Facts" are a white supremacist invention to always make black people wrong.
Shut up fucking racist and go back to pol.
>>8760167
puppet =/= robot
Can anyone tell me what being a electrical engineer is like?
any cock I want
7 inches starting
>>8759756
gay physicists
>>8759756
Mike Pence needs lots of them. Unfortunately he needs them to administer therapy to themselves
What is the wave function?
>>8759623
A probability distribution occupying physical space.
>>8759626
What does the probability distribution represent?
>>8759686
Where a particle ''is.''
>>8759561
If I wanted to live with complex shit, I would get a gf.
only plebs work in algebraically closed fields
>>8759561
ITT: we shit on op
what a fag
We have a modern version of Einstein, get an autograph of this madman while you can.
Ed is an undervalued meme
he is a big guy
>>8759688
>Ed is an undervalued meme
>>8759690
>he is a big guy
4U
What are the best scientific documentaries?
>>8759332
That film is not scientific. It is complete rubbish. BTW the part with the crystals changing shape by the words said is garbage.
C'mon /sci/ send documentaries to OP!
>>8759364
Just because you're a brainlet who doesn't understand cutting edge science doesn't mean the film is wrong
if the percentage of oxygen dips below 19.5% we're all fucking dead man.
>>8758996
Picture not related, I hope?
No, we are not
>>8758996
this desu
What do you think of Freud /sci/? Genius or nutjob?
>>8758667
>"Reality is both a metaphor for and a literal dick."
--Siegmund Freud, gg no re
>>8758667
He was on to something but his explanation is silly.
I recently came up with a philosophy of cognition similar to his ID ego super ego
Note that the reasoning area is the CPU
Memory is the hard drive
The ego portion is like Windows office and has the rules that govern what is to be processed, and how it is to be happen. When given a command.
Example
>command you see smoke
>smoke connected to fire in memory
>the ego process this information and reacts according to its programing by running away because it knows fire is a threat to its self
the concept of self is programmed from interpreting phenomenal experience of its own being.
Then there are chemical and devolmental processes that shape how cognition is formed, perceived(emotion) and how it is carried out.
Just a biocomputer.
And the mind exists in the signs the computer has remembered. Not in the brain.
>>8758765
Forgot picture related
what does /sci / think of philosophy ?
it ended with Stirner
everything from the last 150 years has been intellectual wankery
I like ones that are based on real life practise like Stoicism and Buddhism and can help you weather difficult life circumstance and help you snap out of personal drama.
So, I guess I prefer ethics that is applicable, anything else is just mental masturbation.
it's results are shallow and kinda obvious, but professional philosophers do their best to mystify them in order to make them seem more interesting and important that how they are
is autism curable?
Yes. The best cures are hanging, drowning, or a bullet
>>8757868
Is there a cure for low iq?
>>8757887
does studying increase iq?
I'm not disputing the general idea of evolution that mutations result in selective pressure and adaptation, resulting in development of species.
What is a blatant lie is that evolution is a conclusive theory that fully explains where humans come from.
It does not.
Scientists and anti-theists like Dawkins who shill for evolution neglect to mention that the "missing link", or the creature supposed to be the father of both hominids (us) and other primates such as our closest supposed relatives the chimpanzee, has not been found after decades of intense research and exploration. It does not exist. By all metrics it should have been found but it does not exist.
The idea that humans are "descended from apes" has yet to proven, we have not found the link between hominids and the rest of the primates. There's a massive gap.
The theory and process of evolution as we currently know it is not sufficient to explain the development of a being with the intelligence of a human. Otherwise many other species types would have eventually evolved to a similar level of intelligence. Why are their no intelligent reptiles or intelligent anything else to the same level of humans that they can create civilisation?
The uniqueness and exceptionality of humans defies our understanding of evolution. We should not exist, but we do, and we have yet to find our predecessor.
>>8757781
>What is a blatant lie is that evolution is a conclusive theory that fully explains where humans come from.
No one ever claimed that, you brainlet
>>8757781
Evolution is a fact.
Not being able to find missing link does not make it impossible.
Besides that, humans have hands with fingers, which ables use to make complex tools. We can draw and our mouth enables us to speak. We have what it takes to take the lead. At the secret of making fire and you'll find why we won.
On the other hand, there are a lot of different stories on the origin of this world. Among them is the Abrahamic one. There is no evidence what so ever to make it a fact. Just as much for many other stories on creation.
In nature the Darwinian one just seems to work. Read the book before you redeem is false.
>>8757781
>Why are their no intelligent reptiles or intelligent anything else to the same level of humans
Because there are, dumbass.
looking at their physical appearance?
Always wondered zis
certain traits or characteristics of a personality sure.
Heuristics refined over your lifetime and iteratively refined, drawing on the neurological machinery comprising your subconscious. Coupled with an intelligently created epistemological framework, it's ofte disappointingly accurate. There is such a thing as a "type" of person.
>>8757466
the astrology board would like a word with you
Anyone else here who has studied mathematics/physics/chemistry at a university level, and still has a 'gut instinct' that anthropogenic climate change will all turn out to be a big load of nothing in a few decades' time?
Of course. I doubt anyone on here actually believes that bullshit, only globalist shills.
>>8756962
>math/physics/chem
Why? How about geologists? Or climatologists?