Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 709. page

>>8767291
If bill nye is standing on top of the world then why are their clouds behind him? scientists btfo with their dumb theories about a spherical earth yet again.

>>8767319
I am stand on top of the world every day and there are often clouds behind me. Where do you stand? Mars?

>>8767291
I don't have children myself but with a title like that he needs an ego reduction fast. A short sharp slap upside the head might work.

File: 1488738758805.jpg (209KB, 1200x1127px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1200x1127px

>If we really went to the moon in 1969

What the fuck are you talking about?

1. I was born in 1993. Sure as hell haven't made any trips in 1969.
2. Do you have any idea how much traveling to the Moon costs? A poor student like me can only dream of such things.
3. I'm pretty sure you and I have never met each other, and hence we can't have been on a trip together.

Check your medication.

>>8765841
Well you better check yourself bro, because NASA claims we did.

File: 1483326065750.png (495KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1440x810px

>>8765845
NASA is spreading disinformation. GIBE MONY!!!! HEY GUYS REMEMBER WHEN WE WENT TO MOON? NO? FUCKING COMMIE!
It is not the first time an American agency is doing this. The CIA, for example, spreads flat earth propaganda (source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBguu3khYhk). Therefore, I agree with >>8765841 on not having visited the Moon.

can you code html?

can you code css?

>>8769373
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcGKO0U7qa8
yes

fuck off and go read a book brainlet

>>8769207
Follow this path:
Khan Academy (Complete all of it) > Serge Lange's Basic Mathematics (complete it) > Stewart Calculus (also complete it) > Apostol Calculus > Analysis (Baby Rudin/Intro/First Course Calculus)

>>8769344
Thanks u

0^0 = x implies log (0^0)=log x

but log (0^0)=0*log(0)=0

so log x=0
so x=1

You can't prove it. [math] 0^0 [/math] is not defined. However [math]\displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} x^x [/math] can be shown to be 1.

>>8769169
this implies, first, that you can take the log of 0^0, second that 0*log0=0, assuming, again, that log0 is defined.

This is the proper way:

let x>0, x^x=y>0. Then log(x^x)=log(y). So xlogx=logy. Take the limit x to 0. Since polynomial decrease is faster than logarithmic decrease (can show this via Taylor series, well known result), then the limit is 0. Hence logy=0 so e^0=y=1.
Q.E.D.

>nothing prevents us from reversing the velocity

You're fucking hilarious

>>8768628
i mean theoretically, according to this fella:

https://youtu.be/IVYjCQrg3qg?t=39m9s

>>8768624
The law of entropy mandates a forward flow of time.

>>8768204
Nuclear bomb > all ants on planet combined

>>8768204
>cant hold all these science
>muh math
Why would we weaponise ants? Have you ever seen the scene from the 200 hit classic starring Ben Stiller, where Ben Stiller, also known in the movie as Larry Daley in the movie, gets hit with small arrows shot at him by miniature people? The movie was innovative when it came out. Fairly uninteresting plot, but a fun concept. The characters were so-so, but all in all, I'd see the movie in cinema again if I had the chance.
5/7, I would see it again.

>>8768263
200six hit classic. My lingo ist not there better.

It won't fit in, it's too big. No one will buy this.

Le Ideas Mane

>>8767297
What?

>>8767298
I have a lot of ideas, yeah. But this idea would be a phenomenal success in America

>>8766600
>the universe is expanding
prove it

>>8766658

I don't need to senpai, people smarter than me did that.

>>8766658
Hubble's Law

File: you should be able to solve tits.jpg (294KB, 1186x630px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1186x630px

That's what the term "mind-numbingly boring" means.

that is a problem of instant velocity

Brain turned off? You can solve it if you have the formula memorized, if you don't you can't. This has nothing to do with your brain being on or off.

>>8766188
yeah me too. it started after I signed in at a huge conference some years ago. I guess they sold my data to those cheap rat shops. sucks really really bad.

>>8766205
That's pretty bad, pretty sure you could sue them for that. It's also possible that your email address got listed on their website somewhere, I'm pretty sure these rogue journals use web crawlers to find email addresses.

For me it started after publishing a high impact paper, where my email address is listed as the address of correspondence.

Everyone who has ever published a paper or conference presentation gets spammed by open access journals on the email address printed on the paper. Deal with it.

File: Black_Hole_Milkyway.jpg (598KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 2048x1152px

Bump. Is anyone else following this hole "universe in a black hole" topic?

I think there is no one profoundly challenging theory at the moment, but he only really published related stuff from 2009/2010 onward

Is there any reason at all to assume this is true besides >hurr durr we don't know what's in a black hole?

>>8764507
mathematical realism exposed by normie numales

mostly mental disorder

see http://www.thenewatlantis.com/docLib/20160819_TNA50SexualityandGender.pdf

It's a mental disorde, but the most effective treatment is transitioning.

>>8768117
i have a bachelors in biochemistry, am i safe in saying that there is no science backing the idea that there is more than 2 genders/sex/identity, male and female?

>>8767786
>en.m
>m

God damn phone posters.

Also, there are lots of alien civilizations already making contact. What do you think pulsars are for?

>>8767786
No

I don't think there will be 'one big one' but I think we've made it past a few small ones and there will be many more to come.

>>8767786
SJW's/trannies and all that multiple gender shit taking over the world

>>8767704
You have no idea what perceived means do you?

I know it means what IQ they appear to have by most people in this pic, but I'm just using it to represent the topic, not that specifically though. Guess I should've uploaded a better one

Humans developed cooking so food was easier to chew, the result was less investment into the muscles and mandibles and more investment into the brain.

So people with large jaws and small foreheads are brainlets basically.

>>>/pol/