Can a fly quantum tunnel through a window?
>>8768488
It can, but the probability is overwhelmingly small.
>>8768488
if you don't stop posting on my board i'm gonna quantum tunnel my micro-cock through your asshole
You have a near infinitely higher chance of having the window partially tunnel through the fly and killing it.
which video lessons do you recommend me for Multivariable Calculus.... and applied Calculus Multivariable?
read a book brainlet
>>8768052
Read up on differential forms first and vector calculus becomes trivial
>>8768065
thanks
Which was NASA's best accomplishment? The 350ft Saturn V or the reusable 25 year Shuttle Project?
Saturn V because the shuttle is ridiculous
>>8767469
man on moon
space station
hubble
mars rovers
miniaturization of electronics
astronomy n shit
satellite imagery
>>8767476
But the shuttle brought a new generation interested in space again. The 2000s couldve done with a new space craft design
Why are French people so good at mathematics?
I never heard that stereotype. I know it's true for russians because their educative system is more math oriented than others, to maybe it's something similar in France
>>8767261
Germans and Russians (specially the ashkenazim) are better.
France is so boring that mathematics is a popular form of escapism, although not as popular as being drunk or fucking boys.
what lab goggles does /sci/ wear
biologists fucks LEAVE
>>8766272
Dewalt yellow black
>>8766272
A full face panoramic gas mask.
>>8766313
Cringe. Leave.
How do you power a base? Solar, nuclear or both?
nuclear, solar will get fucked by sand storms.
Reddit said that solar is about 2/3 as effective as on earth. Further away from sun bad. Thin atmosphere good.
>>8764924
Would likely be determined to some extent by availability of resources on Mars, for a base of long term sustainability and size. Obviously, solar will suffer from distance, but if resources for it are abundant, there is plenty of room at least.
Pretty good watch for all the brainlets out there. He explains how you start as a baby, learn a bit, and then go back as a baby to tackle research problems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48Hr3CT5Tpk
This is an old line of thought from his blog and from a casual text he wrote years ago.
It's actually probably the non-mathematical writing I like the most (the worst being the Hillary shilling).
It's valuable because a lot of guys don't understand that rigor and formal logic isn't the end state of math, or that math in practice doesn't look like the field of logic of theoretical computer science. Let alone that most mathematicans probably couldn't name 5 of the 10 or so axioms of ZFC.
>>8764751
>the worst being the Hillary shilling
What was wrong about his proof that drumpf was no good for potus?
>>8764773
>has an image ready to 'trigger drumpfies'
what are you doing with your life
Post your questions that don't deserve their own thread in here.
Previous thread:
>>8748174
What methods other than the scientific method do people on /sci/ find useful to gather truths in various aspects of life?
I am taking a lot of time travelling to college and back.
How do I learn to study in my room?
Is there a guide to follow?
>>8763893
Discourse with people I consider peers.
Listening to other people that have great authority in their field.
>>8763893
>What methods other than the scientific method do people on /sci/ find useful to gather truths in various aspects of life?
You'd get mad if you were to use the scientific method in real life to find "truths".
You can of course do experiments and find stuff, but the truth of it would be so weak it's totally irrelevant, the world is way too vast to use the scientific method in a non retarded way as an individual.
Works, opinions and experiences
>inb4 useless
>inb4 not science
>inb4 nice try Wolfram
>>8761990
nice try wolfram, they're completely useless and don't belong on the science board, fuck off
Conway's Game of Life should be the most popular CA but there's a lot more to it.
It is a good way to understand the numerous possibilities of Turing complete CAs.
I think they're cool, I thnk that kids should be exposed to them at a young age considered how easily they are defined and convey very well the message thay simple rules can lead to very interesting. I also think Wolfram went a bit too far and forcifully tried to build a whole philosophical system around there without really much scientific to say...
When did you get redpilled on the career prospects in science?
Out of my graduating class of mathematics bs, 3 years later all either ended up in retail or working as teachers.
The few that went to graduate school, myself included are the only mildly successful ones.
that's why i'm doing it as a hobby
it's not going anywhere but it's fun
>>8761825
You're going to uni as a hobby?
>>8761815
meanwhile i got an engineering degree and too one of your pathetic friends' jobs as a physicist
The War on Biological Science continues. This thread is for discussion of the science of genetic determinism and not politics. Meaning, why the science behind genetic determinism should be allowed instead of banned. Science merely unveils truths. Banning said truths is always bad.
https://openparliament.ca/bills/42-1/S-201/
This enactment prohibits any person from requiring an individual to undergo a genetic test or disclose the results of a genetic test as a condition of providing goods or services to, entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with, or offering specific conditions in a contract or agreement with, the individual.
>>8770036
/pol/ gtfo
>canada begins laying the ground work for a clone army.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA2ACgGWkco
Banning genetic tests is similar to these ideas
Ban academic tests - no one should be judged by their academic success
Ban criminal history - no one should be judged for their past criminal activity
etc
The idea that Genetic Tests are somehow not allowable or exactly similar is ludicrous. All anti-genetic determinism does is slow down and hold back society. If a genetic test can inform an employer on the success rate of their employee, it should be allowable. A full on genetic test ban is too heavy handed and stupid.
>people actually think this shitbox can survive lunar reentry
Why?
They're not using Dragon 1 you idiot.
That is what it looks like after going through the atmosphere. What else than circlejerk makes your retarded brain think it won't make it?
people like to meme on the shuttle tiles but aren't they (or something like them) basically required for any true future spacecraft?
even with a heatshield, you can't have the thermal blankets covering everything else getting scorched on every landing and needing replaced after 1 or 2 flights
It's there any genius who started late (30) or does it mean I'm too old and therefore fucked?
>>8769717
you're fucked
delete your thread and go away
>>8769727
you can't delete threads any more
>>8769717
If you actually cared about making it, you wouldn't need the approval of a Samoan tribal painting convention.
You're just looking for excuses not to try.
This is Pierre Louise Lions, 1994 Fields Medal recipient. His citation reads
>"... such nonlinear partial differential equation simply do not have smooth or even C1 solutions existing after short times. ... The only option is therefore to search for some kind of "weak" solution. This undertaking is in effect to figure out how to allow for certain kinds of "physically correct" singularities and how to forbid others. ... Lions and Crandall at last broke open the problem by focusing attention on viscosity solutions, which are defined in terms of certain inequalities holding wherever the graph of the solution is touched on one side or the other by a smooth test function."
And this is Maryam Mirzakhani, a 2014 Fields Medal recipient. She is the first woman to receive the fields medal. Her citation reads
>"for her outstanding contributions to the dynamics and geometry of Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces."
Why did it take so long for a woman to win a Fields Medal?
>>8769527
>woman
>>8769527
Hmmm really makes you think
Albino plants and animals are white because they have no pigment to reflect light with. If you gave a plant chlorophyll that didnt reflect light at all, chlorophyll that would itself be black because it doesnt reflect light, would the plant be its natural white color or take on the color of the chlorophyll?
This is fucking with my head because the answer to both colors being the dominant one is as far as i can tell the same.
>>8769420
it would be green you nitwit
>>8769420
>albino plants
you have no fucking clue what you're talking about
>>8769420
Chlorophyll is green, it does reflect light.
Guess what, it reflects green light.
It's even in the name, chloro.