Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 657. page

>>8803660
exciting

you did good, old buddy
press f to pay respects

>>8805002
F

>>8803505
>Science
>Jurisprudence
>Philosophy

Wat? Also get a fucking wordpress faggot.

>>8803510
>Jurisprudence is not a science
By definition it is a science of law
>Philosophy is not a science
Read W. V. O. Quine

>>8803505
>knowing this much about every field
I'm on the fence between saying it's impressive you're so knowledgeable, to saying you wasted a ton of time and don't know anything. Like jurisprudence. What the fuck is that? Did you google "list of science subjects," find jurisprudence, and then spend hours reading about all the scientist in that field?

psychometrics, obviously

>>8803014
that's a big butt

>>8803014
Neuropsychology obviously.

could be shitloads of autoimmune diseases

do u have any more med papers, labs and shit?

>>8800448
Take some iodine, that'll fix it

>>8800493
>do u have any more med papers, labs and shit?
Yes.
Everything was fine except for:

+1 Hemoglobin in urine

High ferritin 486 ug/L [12-300]

High Bilirubin 41 umol/L [<20]

>>8798882
poopoopipi

>>8798882
Propose a ludicrous, unreasonable idea at a TED talk.

>>8798882
>go to burning man
>realize it's really similar to mars
>tell him when he does a q&a

he will be really grateful to have someone experienced in his team

>>8798806
>Is there anything at all FOR psychopaths?
no because they're usually criminals and assholes

>How are they supposed to deal and get through the life?
Learn emotions.

What are the ways and tactics of productively dealing with society other than exploiting everyone until they figure out and tell you to fuck off?
Society is shit deserves nothing other than exploitation. What do you mean by productive?

>Is there a possible way to maintain productive long term relationships with people?
Learn emotions and take a liking to people. Find people that are so complex that you take multiple decades to figure them out. This will result in you keeping them around longer

>>8798806

The fact that "psychopaths" have almost no activity in their PFC or temporal lobes make a good argument for morality, what "psychopaths" are famous for lacking, simply being foresight with cost/benefit analysis. The more intelligent you are the more consequences of an action you can perceive the more efficient you are at choosing paths which avoid the most painful consequences. Psychopaths can't do this thus they always choose inefficient paths and suffer the worst consequences.

>>8798806
>how to identify and get rid of Psychopaths
>Suddenly 90% of doctors are gone.

Hmmmm.

Bump for interest

>it's anecdotal evidence
Fuck you I'm posting it anyway

I used to smoke weed. While high off my ass, I consumed about 3 years of topology lectures in about 4 months. I could do all the exercises. I took an IQ test, got 154.

About 6 months ago my weed dealer went to jail and I've been sober ever since. I have difficulty concentrating in class now (never had that problem before). I can't watch lectures on youtube for hours anymore. I can still retain information if I try really, really hard. I took an IQ test last week when that faggot posted a thread on here. Coincidentally, it was the same site I took the test on before. I got 130.

I can't tell you if weed made me smarter, because I'd never been tested before I scored 154. I can't tell you if smoking weed will get me my 24 points back. I can't tell you if it was a fluke, either.

But don't smoke the ganja, bro. There's a nonzero chance that when you stop smoking it you're going to be cognitively impaired, or at the very least, lose your passion for learning. Err on the side of caution.

Somewhat relevant link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10780248

>>8783153
This post was entirely pointless as it utterly negated itself at the end.

Well done for wasting anyones time who actually read through until the end.

10/10

>>8811136
Because God did it and he is proven to be a retarded engineer.

>>8811136
Insulin is needed to promote glycolysis. In its absence, gluconeogenesis takes place.

File: insulin.png (100KB, 791x585px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 791x585px

>>8811179

File: 1489976060124.jpg (100KB, 489x750px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 489x750px

If they are both identical. the resulting motion will be the same.

The problem is kinda like the chaos theory, there is so many variables to consider that it's almost right to say it's random.

>>8810477
Do you have to consider the acceleration of the red pendulum when determining the location (relative to the tip of the red pendulum) of the blue pendulum

t. brainlet

>>8810482
There are only two variables, though. What makes a system chaotic isn't the number of variables, but the sensitivity to those variables and their initial conditions. A tiny, tiny change is either starting angle results in a dramatic change in the trajectory, which is the definition of chaos.

Theoretical physics.

>>8810085
Let's say I wanted to self study it. Is this possible through a linear progression through various specific topics or textbooks?

>>8810091
Most universities post their curriculum and which textbooks they use online.

Go take a look

>>8809333

If this is true, you might actually be autistic. Do you really enjoy rote practice more than pushing the boundaries of your knowledge? Try expanding your horizons a bit: try to come up with a problem in number theory that others haven't thought about, and then attempt to solve that.

Or, even better, spend some time trying to solve problems that we know about but don't already know how to solve. You could give the Collatz conjecture a go, for instance.

>>8809365
>try to come up with a problem in number theory that others haven't thought about

Chill the fuck out, I have 2 more years before I have to write a thesis. Coming up with a babby problem today that some russian probably thought about 150 years ago is pointless. Time is better used rising to the highest level.

>Do you really enjoy rote practice more than pushing the boundaries of your knowledge?
There is no nothing rote about writing proofs.

>spend some time trying to solve problems that we know about but don't already know how to solve. You could give the Collatz conjecture a go, for instance.

HA
HA
HA

I have given the Collatz conjecture and Goldbach conjecture many tries. Specially way back when I was a freshman. Now I am smart enough to know that elementary proofs are not here yet and if I want a chance I need to become a number theory god.

>>8809393
I agree with you, you're just doing this shit for fun. How do you do it for fun though? Due to traumatizing effects of math(getting real stressed over it in the past) I got a hatred of math. So how do you enjoy it so well to the point you get a boner and want to fuck a prime number.

I put my conservative estimate to be around 100 years from now, my realistic estimate at 101-300 years and my hyper realistic estimate to be never because humanity will die out before then. Anyways, it is a combo of time, tech and infrastructure that we need to overcome. Space has plenty of resources, but that would cause massive inflation. If we want to colonize space, we need massive changes to our own planet and our domestic problems first.

>>8804568
I think in 100 years with improvements in AI and Robotics life will get very cozy on earth. At least in rich countries people will have universal income and only a few work hours a week. Only poor people in shit countries will be motivated to colonize space.

they're not. make a stupid questions for a stupid questions thread

>>8810914
Well, according to my book, they are, and I have to prove it.

And if that is the case, I shall do so. Thank you for replying, anon!

>>8810909
These are both pretty trivial when you consider the sums modulo the relevant number (6 or 19).

>>8809862
No.

only if you want to work in Japan or for a japanese company.

>>8809868

Well, Japan is doing pretty cool stuff with nanotech...That's the excuse I want to use.

>>8809840
CP-violation

>>8809840
All Matter Matters

>>8809840
There's 2 possible reasons.

1. There wasn't equal amounts of matter and antimatter, for some reason.

2. All of the matter and all of the antimatter have not yet met, hence they have not yet annihilated each other.