Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 570. page

>>8876445

If you haven't been studying it's too late for you

>>8876463
This

>>8876463

This is true. You should be comfortable with syntax, sorting algorithms, matrices, and writing simple programs by now. The only thing you should be studying is the case example that you'll be tested on the exam. It's possible to goof off and only study one month before the exam and get a five, but any later is pushing it dangerously close.

>>8875365
Almost certainly incomplete

>>8875365
breaking Big Bang - Heisenberg

https://youtu.be/zO2vfYNaIbk?t=50s

>>8875365
When black hole reaches a critical mass and the matter within the singularity loses its material cohesion, it will transform into pure energy virtually instantaneously and cause a new 'bubble' of space. Our 'universe' is only one of many and acceleration of the expansion of the universe is due to outside gravitational/electromagnetic forces.

Atleast thats the most logical explanation i can come up with since i dont believe in hypothetical dark memes.

>>8875194
Humans are affecting the world
Don't deny how multiple species are going extinct.
Even inorganics are affected

>>8875194
>only 10% difference

>>8875194
>Women more likely to be liberal
>Normies have no distinction between science and politics

Guarantee you they also are more likely to believe GMOs are bad. It means nothing.

File: 00.jpg (2KB, 224x250px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 224x250px

>>8874709

>>8874711
Why? I mean, I don't study it, but I have tried it and it requires mathematical thinking + memorizing syntax.

File: The truth about CS.png (89KB, 1155x409px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1155x409px

>>8874722

>>8874516
Yes, not because Bill Nye told me so, but because bitches are freaking out up north about the quicker thawing permafrost up north

>>8874516
Solid state batteries and nuclear fusion would solve it overnight tbqh.

to bad it's both vaperware.

Depends on the IQ of the planet.

>>8872267
No but you'll be reading that there is a 97% consensus that gender is on a spectrum in all the popsci soon enough.

>>8872279

File: Oh look a figure! Science uses figures, right, so this is SCIENCE!.png (410KB, 835x593px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 835x593px

>>8872267

>>8879502
Start a world war bro

>grab hold of yourself
>repeat "we build the world" until the feelings go away

>>8879502
I shill >$10K/user software aimed at civil engineers.
thanks for money, sucker

File: 1431789990667.jpg (31KB, 372x351px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 372x351px

>religion

>>8879310
Well, if you can't tell, this is the absolute worst time to be trying to get success on YouTube with all the shit going on... I mean judging by the way you wrote that, you're probably way dumber and less capable than you think and wouldn't do well even if the market was safe

>>8879310
Personally, I watch Numberphile, Computerphile, 3 blue 1 brown, thunderfoot( for the debunkings) and some smaller ones. The only thing that lacks, is someone who talks about morality or medicine.

>>8878886
A

>>8878886
3

>>8878886
Why did you drop out anon? What are you planning to do now?

A(1) holds as
[math] 1=\sum_{U\subseteq\{1\}}\prod_{j\in U}\frac{1}{j}=\frac{1}{1}=1\,.[/math]
someone else can do the rest

>>8878859
Explain the notation and I will be sure to solve it for you, as my IQ is 257.

>>8878876
ight well this anon just did the base case for n=1.
you can assume n=k, so prove n=k+1 is true using induction.

Why is hating everyone and loathing humanity such a meme at this point? Instead of berating your peers, why don't you actively try to be the change you want to see? Really, what is loathing your species going to do for you? You were given great potential being born as a human, why not use it to actively improve humanity instead of hating it from a distance?

woah, thats fucking selfish. you stand on the shoulders of giants and dont want to let anyone stand on yours.
well, is a choice, but a lonely and sour one.

>>8878812

Why not design weapons?

>>8878555
I've read stuff saying that within a few decades we'll run out of vital rare earth metals that are required in many kinds of technology. How true is this?

Non-renewable resources don't exist... Its all a matter of how much energy you are willing to spend to reuse them.
And when energy costs become prohibitively high, you can also find alternatives.

>>8879150
>Non-renewable resources don't exist... Its all a matter of how much energy you are willing to spend to reuse them.

How much energy do we have then? Solar and wind are unreliable, and as of now inefficient, aren't they?

>>8878018
Is rape just crime about putting certain atoms too close without consent of that atom?

>>8878018
I think it's just a reductio ad absurdum fallacy. You say "forbidden number", and then everyone thinks "oh, how dumb it would be if you weren't allowed to share the number 1031242895", but in reality, the numbers you are talking about have millions (song) or billions (movie) of digits, so there is practically no chance of someone just arriving at them at random. The artists put work into creating those digits, and they deserve to have the ability to sell their product without others copying it and distributing it for free.
You wouldn't be justified in sharing a bitshifted copy of it with the intent of letting other people then turn it back into the original, just like you aren't justified in sharing an encrypted or zipped version.
The bits in a drake song couldn't correlate with a physical constant, because physical constants aren't measured to millions of digits of precision. If for some strange reason the bits correlated with a mathematical constant, like e, they wouldn't ban calculating that constant, because that would be absurd. The artist would be in a really shitty position, because anyone could just download a program that calculates the digits, but so what, his fans would still buy his music, so nothing of significance would happen.

>>8878018
No, it's not the binary that's copyrighted. You could use a different binary format or even a trinary system and it'd still be copyrighted. With that in mind you could reformat the binary code to resemble literally anything else in the world that's binary. Which would mean they could sue anybody else in the world for copyright infringement.

For instance, if you could make a new binary format or encryption that makes a pirated movie appear as Moby dick. Then then the movie's legal copyright owner could sue anyone for owning a copy of the book Moby dick.

For every scientist you find who disagrees with the science of climate change I can find a thousand who agree with it.

http://www.ucsusa.org

Single scientists will have pet theories. Single scientists may have personal agendas or be lured by greed. This is why it's more important to find groups of scientists working together so that the opinions of contrarians will be filtered out.

And by the way you will find no examples of any single body of scientists on Earth who support your claim that climate change is a myth. None.

That should tell you something about the science behind it.

>>8878045
AGW is the science of moving goal posts and confirmation bias with a mix of "the ends justify the means".

>>8878063
This is a science board. Prove it

A meteor, it's a solved question.

With 99% probability, an asteroid. With 1% probability, a prototype electrical weapon.

I thought it was a comet