8=-4.9x^2+14.7x
Its part of a physics question to find x which will give us the time at which a ball is 8m above a persons hand
Op here find x
quadratic and do your own homework
You try it then man because I can't solve after quadratic and its not homewor its extra work
are cock gobblers more better at science? I know the genuine everyday swingin' dick don't give no fucks, but if they apply themselves rump-stuffers seem to be pretty goat at science-y endeavors.
inb4 Newton.
What are you asking? Your post was so full of memes I couldn't understand it.
>>8881223
hes asking if the gays are better at science
>>8881217
I'm reading this from my office at work and holding back my laughter. God damn it, /sci/
Do you think it will be possible to completely change one's gender using technology in the future?
Or experience the other side of the bargain using advanced vr?
Right now sex reassignement is just a fancy term for genital mutilation but I think genetics and bioengineering could make all kinds of body modification possible in the future.
>>8880706
Gender is defined by who you are faggot, sex and gender and separate
>>8880717
Don't yell at me, English is not my first language and I thought you could use those terms interchangeably.
No that's impossible and against the natural order.
Do you think there will be a real grand unified theory in the 21st century?
No, because the possibility that physical laws change at different scales can't be ruled out.
>>8880101
If I was trying to come up with the dumbest fucking answer to this question it would be this one.
Anyway, I think it's possible that it could happen very soon. Fields like string theory and quantum loop gravity seem to be so close to making major breakthroughs.
>>8880101
couldn't that change be accounted for in the universal theory if that was true?
Are Population controls in the industrial world the only way to combat climate change?
>>8877135
>Classical liberals
>WE ABHOR EUGENICS!
>Modern liberals
>Lol cisscum, no children for you whitey!
>Racism? No, no.
>It is to save the planet you bigot!
>>8877135
No need. Populations growth rates in the industrialized world are already negative, or close to it.
You just need to raise the rest of the world out of poverty, and easy and cheap access to contraception for everyone, and you need feminism to empower women to use that contraception.
>>8877485
>feminism
I like to call it equality or human rights.
Why is he so based?
>>8876608
stop posting pedophiles on /sci/ faggot
>>8876611
Is this a random shitpost or is there evidence?
He's based because he's ~40 y/o, has a shit ton of experience in science (nuclear chemistry), so in turn knows a lot about how reality works.
He should do some more introspection and think out his video's when he's tackling political issues though.
>hit up double you double double you dot youtube dot com
>search for a vid explaining some compsci concept.
>Pajeet greets you with a thick accent through a cheap microphone off of a broken headset in 360p while translating at the same time in hindi
>search for a math topic
>eloquent ivy league aluimni with decades of experience explains the theory well with animations and all in 4K HD 48khz Dolby Surround IMAX PEGI 12
you mathniggers dont know how fucking privileged you are
who are you quoting?
The math topics you look up are what any brainlet in a STEM program goes through, so of course there's ton of demand for vids to be made. If I start looking up topics in commutative algebra I get Pajeets, too.
what's with all the racism against indians on 4chan anyways
so its been possible for a while now to see atoms through electron microscopes, which is pretty cool imo, but what about subatomic particles? are there any promising technologies which could magnify even further so that we can view these particles with our own eyes?
>>8883172
Not if we're limited by heisenberg's uncertainty principle
>>8883172
In a sense. LHC.
>>8883172
Are those really atoms? Isn't there supposed to be a huge amount of empty space between them?
Pls no bully
how does one intuit the derivative of csc x? i can't seem to find/remember it without deriving it or rote memorization. the same goes for more complicated derivatives/integrals
>>8882830
Like sec but with co- and a minus sign.
d/dx[sec(x)]=sec(x)tan(x)
d/dx[csc(x)]=-csc(x)cot(x)
d/dx[tan(x)]=sec^2(x)
d/dx[cot(x)]=-csc^2(x)
>>8882858
yea but that's just using mnemonic techniques for memorization. sure, a step up from rote memorization. are there not people who just sort of "see" the answer? they imagine what the derivative would look like and realize the shape is -csc(x)cot(x)?
i want to know how those people do that, if that's even something that people new to the subject can do.
>>8882861
It's just the chain rule dude. It's nothing profound.
csc(x) = [sin(x)]^-1
d/dx[csc(x)] = d/dx[[sin(x)]^-1] = - [sin(x)]^-2 * cos(x) = - cos(x)/sin(x) 1/sin(x) = -cot(x)csc(x)
How to explain local sharp spikes and dips in pH or conductivity?
>>8882759
Further explanation: we surveyed 16 points along a body of water, tested for various metal ions, chloride, pH, conductivity, ORP, temperature and dissolved oxygen. But we got pic related's values. What else could have affected them?
>>8882763
what type of body of water? how deep was it? was there any flora/fauna around where you measured? did you check microbe populations around your measurement points?
>>8882767
It was a brook. It wasn't deeper than two or three feet at the most. There may have been tiny fish. There was some algae that I couldn't ID. It was on the edge of a dairy farm. We didn't check microbes because this was a Gen.Chem. 2 project.
If I was teleported to the center of the sun for one trillionth of a second and then transported back to earth would I be okay?
>>8882694
Sure why not
I think youd be crushed by gravity even if you manage to not get burned
you'd probably be a bit melted, but otherwise intact
If the second law of thermodynamics states:
>Entropy must always increase in a closed system
Then explain this:
>>8882676
which am i explaining?
that oil floats in water or that oil doesn't mix with the water?
Things at "equilibrium" have higher entropy
If I were to soak a flight of stairs in batter and deep fry them, but NOT eat them, would that provide any insight into the calculicity band of the electrostrong interaction?
what
no, you'd have to eat them to get any useful data
>>8882533
What would the day and time have to be though? Thats where the moving comes in.
geniune as fuck polymath here. You have a real treat today -- I am open to questions for 15 minutes. Shoot.
>>8882389
AIDS. Real or false. Include sources.
>why aids proteins are found in human placentae
>exoplasma very seemed to vih particles
Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
>>8882389
Influence of India-China-Eastern Africa in current economics. Is this a real menace to USA today?
>engineering friend thought this proof from his hw was difficult
Why are engineers such brainlets?
>>8882323
>Not defining H(X)
you might be an engineer too
>>8882323
I have no idea what H does. kys yourself
>>8882350
>defining H(X) on an information theory HW assignment