Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 511. page

>>8922943
Better word to use would be breed desu

>>8922943
Debunk what?

Well, the ones on the left are all black while the ones on the right are different colors.

pwned, n00b

>>8922537
>spamming videos

>>8922537
Is this satire? I can't tell the difference between that, shitposting, and genuine retardation anymore.

>>8922537
cavendish experiment

File: 1486558192806.gif (3MB, 400x226px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x226px

>>8921274
no what the fuck?

>>8921274
That's why gravity would be less towards the centre of the planet, right? Less mass moving "outwards" with the expansion of the universe to feel the effects of inertia.

>>8921274
gravity is an unneccesary and unproven explanation anyway

I'm a CS major and he's right that most CS undergrad is shit you can teach yourself.

The education system is behind in CS.

Everything else in the letter is just RADICAL FREEDOM, FUCK YEAH! Which is fine I guess.

>>8927481
still...all the time money and hours invested already and you tank now? Seems like someone took his first hit of LSD and went off the deep end of nihilism

>>8927488
Basically seems so yeah

It means that most people who are smart enough to complete rigorous education in natural sciences are also smart enough to grow out of edgy fedoralord materialism and understand that science and religion are two completely different domains.

File: 1491102071003.jpg (19KB, 640x589px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 640x589px

Discovering that life's incredible natural processes are self-regulating understandably makes one critical of sentiments like "God raises the sun every morning," and other religious notions that man and nature requires active oversight when change over time largely follows understood priori and trends.

However, deeper down the rabbit hole of human discovery still lies deep unknowns, irrational and unnatural phenomena that are accounted for but have never been understood. Modern schools of thought and formula theorize that there is in fact a limit to human comprehension of the universe as well. When you spend so much time analyzing the unnecessarily beautiful world we live in, it no longer seems foreign to believe in an active deity, sustaining and creating in the present day.

>>8927066
The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you. But after drinking all the glasses, not only one, atheism comes back.

>>8926959
0%. I win. kys op

>>8926962
Could you elaborate on what the acronym K.Y.S stands for?

>>8926991
I think he means the K.Y.S theorem named after (Kaczynski - Young - Sarmiento) about necessary and sufficient conditions for you to kill yourself

>>8926893
There would be all sorts of problems initially, but eventually enough mutation will occur that the gene pool will start to correct itself. That will take a very long amount of time, but can be hastened with proper monitoring and selective breeding.

>a little incest

kek, is that like being a little pregnant?

Fuck like rabbits, then hope two of them are different enough to not have a fucked up baby.

>>8926909
So hypothetically, if a man were to construct a rocket ship with warp drive to take himself, his wife, and a robot with him to another planet then there is still a chance of populating that new planet? What if there were aliens there who are compatible with humans?

First pick 3 and compare them to any other 3. Then you have it narrowed down to 3.

Then pick any one of the three and compare it to any other one

Put 4 one, 5 in the other.
Then do the same for the ones in the scale which weighed the least.
You could probably find it then.

>>8926098
>you could probably find it then

File: 20170521_153418.jpg (2MB, 1271x2124px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1271x2124px

Bump

No one that knows?

>>8925682
Its called projective geometry

bamp

>>8925874
Rip, You're just lazy.
I read in our schools psychology textbook that the theory of limited willpower was only proven in one experiment and since then has never been replicated. Willpower has been shown to dramatically change by doing arbitrary things like eating a tasty cookie. You pretty much have infinite willpower dude.

>>8925634
>>8925923
This OP, just stop being a lazy fucker and do what you need to do. It becomes more evident as you get older and grow out of it.

t.former lazy fucker

>>8925223
Trigonometric substitution

ok this one is easy

first factor out g, so you have 1/(g*(1-k/g*v^2))
now you substitute u=sqrt(k/g)*v, so du/sqrt(k/g)=dv
now you have some prefactor, lets call it A*1/(1-u^2)du. Now you rip it apart and say OK: 1/(1-u^2)=C1/(1+u)+C2/(1-u). Determine C1 and C2 such that the equality holds and now you only have to integrate 1+-u which is ln(1+-u). mix everything together, simplify and you should end up with something like prefactor*arctan(something)
you're welcome

>>8925223
The only way is to sit down and integrate like a madman, after you have integrated hundreds of exercises you will be set. There are no standard paths to integrate so you must get the intuition by grinding.

>>8925059
Ecology, systems&network theory/science
People who don't know life sciences and can't look at nature as an interactive whole are pretty boring imo

>>8925091
Cool, that's an idea.

I'm looking at going from Feynman into "Fundamentals of Molecular Engineering" and a bunch of books on electromagnetics and microwave and antenna design.

But also move forward in some other areas.

Seems to me that physics is more theoreticsl and requires more abstract thinking, whereas chemistry mostly consists of plugging observation-based numbers into a equation for the purpose of findinging the likely result of putting two substances together,

File: Required Reading.jpg (2MB, 1360x3837px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1360x3837px

>>8925059
You'll never make it.

>>8925017
It means someone needs to ease off of their drugs

>>8925204
I can't, they're prescribed.

>>8925017
>What does this diagram mean?
Nothing, absolutely nothing.

>>8924382
>Philosophy is a joke bruh

How does our species define truth?

>>8925398
With the scientific method you dope. Kek

>>8925398
no such thing, at least in an absolute way, so there is no need

This post is vaguely similar to the /tv/ shitpost of "I just watch film A, did I like it?"

>>8923946
bitch fuck you answer the question

What do you have to take?
Typically speaking, people who are bad at math will struggle with Calculus II
Most people struggle with Thermodynamics or Fluid Mechanics
Heat and Mass Transfer may get you
It depends, so just show us what you gotta take anon