Finally an explanation for this guy's superintelligence. Turns out that he couln't remember faces. That means that our capability for recongizing faces must take a lot of processing power for the brain, and Neumann just used that extra processing power for other things.
https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=BDC6VOVzHykC&pg=PT174&lpg=PT174&dq=john+von+neumann+%22remember+faces%22&source=bl&ots=sWI9y15nce&sig=NzE9-f7qTSEyH4D8osGrrvaAQIk&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUgobi2o7UAhXG6yYKHY76DlEQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=john%20von%20neumann%20%22remember%20faces%22&f=false
>>8937661
I do not think so, there are millions of brainlets out there right now who are unable to recognize faces
I'm faceblind. It fucking sucks. I recognize people by their gait and their voice. If someone changes their hair or makeup, I can't recognize them. There have been times that I wasn't sure if a girl was my GF or someone who looked similar.
>>8937896
shit that never happened
How likely are engineered animals with human traits as pets scientifically possible?
We literally already have done that, with the engineering method known as "selective breeding".
A lot of pets have been bred to have features that resemble humans more so that people like them more
Selective breeding for high intellegence has also had some very good results for certain breeds of dogs and birds.
As for using something like CRISPR to make a super smart racoon who can talk, that's a really long way off
>>8937337
>furry
>>8937346
I mean beyond that, where they are actually bipedal and can talk and use tools and fly spacecraft and consent and things like this
Hey /sci/ I was thinking about majoring in chemical engineering but I have some doubts about getting into the major. I've heard that it's incredibly difficult to find work and that the job market isn't that great right now. After looking at bls.gov, the job growth for chemical engineering looks pretty bleak.
How is employment like for chemical engineers? Is it really that hard to find work as a chemical engineer? Does the job market look like it's improving or is it best to stay away? Any chemical engineers here struggled to find internships or work after graduating? How hard is the major itself? Would a computer science degree lead to better pay & employment?
>>8936246
>t-Zn-H2O
trans-Zinc monohydrate?
>>8936246
Doing any STEM subject right now is pretty hit and miss whether you'll be employed directly in that field.
here in Mexico it's one of the best major to study
What do we mean when we say that someone is a creative genius? Is it even a real thing? As I understand it, genius is someone of an unparalleled intellectual capacity, and therefore an ability to deduce what others cannot.
What is so "genius" about producing art anyway? From the common knowledge, and also personal experience, although it is sometimes takes effort to create something worthwhile, creative process very dissimilar to any form of logical thought. It just "comes", no actual hard logical thinking is involved. Of course creativity comes from neural activity, but so do skills in basketball, videogames, and doing cool skateboard stunts. We don't call someone who is adept at that a "genius". Sure, we award praise to people who are outstanding at sports or even vidya, but word "genius" seems to imply an outstanding, unmatched skill at a hard intellectual activity, which I think art is not. Artistic creativity is something that has only subjective value, and even further, unlike, for example, pure mathematics, does not even require intellectual effort to create.
tl;dr: Art is cool, and good art takes effort, but it is NOT a "smart activity". Is creative """genius""" thing a meme, /sci/?
Art has always stayed on a subjective side of things, no matter the formalities we impose on it. Unlike physical strength, physical attractiveness, games, intellectual disciplines, and other human activities which all can easily have a sense of competition imposed on them, it seems that art emerged purely for the sake of art. Seems like it cannot have any sort of competition imposed on it at all, without destroying the initial idea. Which seems very weird and unproductive for our Darwinian universe. Consciousness also seems to serve no evolutionary purpose, and since there is no reason to objectively value art in an evolutionary sense, we commonly associate two together, like it was commonly thought that "robots are incapable of creativity".
Why do we, as a species, have this nag to create that which cannot be used for inter and intra-species competition, and attribute immense value to it? Why do we think of it as of a hard intellectual activity?
pls respond
>>8935966
it derives from useless aristocrats jerking each other off
Where is the soul kept in the body?
>>8935921
Under the hood? Next to the battery? The soul begins and ends with the brain.
right behind the eyeballs and in the sinus
>>8935921
What is your definition of soul?
I was listening to Mike Shermer on JRE and I want to know SCI opinions on consciousness
Consciousness is the subjective experience of the mind(sensu biosemiotics) made possible with a symbolic memory.
The mind exists in sign relations.
cogito ergo sum
>>8934883
We don't know our brains well enough to come up with definition of consciousness that would be usefull outside of philosophy. As we know, philosophy is useless itself, so we can't have a usefull definition of consciousness yet
I want to know /sci's honest opinion of it. Could this actually have been possible?
I am a strong believer in an unknown, very advanced pre-histpric civilization that spanned across the globe but suddenly disappeared because of some cataclysmic or nuclear war event taking the humanity back into the stone age. Only a few thousand survived and they didn't know how to rebuild civilization and didn't have the means to as everything was reduced to rubble and dust.
All cultures have a myth of some kind of huge flood that killed almost everyone and then people had to start a new. However, the ancient civilization didn't even have to be human. It could have been some other species that were very advanced but died out to some reason. There could have been a few advanced civilizations, human or not, living on Earth before us. Almost every culture also has myths about Giants living on earth before humans and even co-existing with them at one time. There's also rare objects that were made so advanced for their time that even today people don't know how to make such things, for example Damascus steel, Iron Pillar of Dehli that doesn't rust, the lady of Dai preservation(meant people knew micbobes existed), Antikhera mechanism(first analog computer), Baigong pipes etc..
>>8933746
and the people who survived forgot how to write and read?
no it's not possible we would have records of that and of such a cataclysmic event.
>>8933753
I think the event happened more than 10,000 years ago so even if they did write something down on some paper, or clay tablets it just didn't survive that long to reach us. However, some of that knowledge could have been saved grom generation to generation into antiquity but didn't reach us. Also languages change fairly quickly, even if they wrote something on a wall and it survived out linguists would not be able to read it.
We would know if there was a civilization destroying nuclear war at any point in the past. The sudden increase in the concentration of uranium isotopes and the products of their fissile decay, or the decay products of plutonium would be instantly noticeable in the soil layer.
Light is a wave. Light is also a particle. Why couldn't light be a particle that is carried by a wave, like De Broglie suggests? Why we have things like wave function collapse and other fairy-tale like explanations? The future generations will laugh at our ignorance.
Literally who cares nerd lmao
>>8933409
My question seems to BTFO'd the nondeterministic fags.
>>8933414
learn about pilot wave theory you faggot.
Anybody here in bioinformatics, mircobio, or biochem?
I'm a ChemEng major but I've started taking mircobio classes even though they won't count towards my degree. The idea of doing genetic research just gives me a hard on.
How difficult is it to get into genetic research? What's it like?
>>8931567
If your school has an iGEM team, get involved. I started out as a chemfag for undergrad. I got involved and picked up the tools of the trade for genetic manipulation, plus I got a paper out of it. I'm starting my PhD in this shit in the fall. I also got to go to the conference in Boston, which was dope af
>hooked up w qt biochem girl from Scotland
>tfw we'll never meet again
>>8931667
what was your degree in?
Microbio here
Depends on the level of genetic engineering
Redpill me on Feynman. Why is he so important, why is he a genius?
Everytime you mention him, physicist and educated laypersons get their panties moist. Why?
>>8937757
>redpill
Fuck off
>>8937757
Read one of his books.
He discovered a lot of important and fundamental physics concepts which you've never heard of because you're a brainlet
It's kind of pointless to try to just explain quickly because if people list off what he discovered you would just be like "what's that? huh? what's that?"
>double major
stop being a tryhard
>>8935969
>paying money to be forced to take some bullshit sociology elective
>not doing a double major and replacing that with something actually interesting
B R A I N L E T
R
A
I
N
L
E
T
>>8935969
Stop using the teenage LoL-player definition of "tryhard".
>>8935969
>tfw I know someone who dropped out of calc 1 but they're double majoring in math and chem
What are some scientific facts about it? Should it be avoided?
i like it
if you are lack toast and tolerant you should buy lack toast free milk
>>8934670
Nothing goes better with cookies than cold milk.
Does your body shit out on it? If yes then go with one of the various alternatives if not just skip it all together.
Now is it healthy? Depends, the shitty thing with medicine is they usually can't agree on anything and to be honest you have to realize that despite the fact that they look at national averages your unique situation (racial background, where you're from, diet, lifestyle, etc) will make you very different from an "average".
So just figure out how your body reacts to it.
why isnt temporal mechanics a thing? why dont we study time as a physical concept?
>>8934438
>chinese cartoon poster
kys desu senpai
>>8934444
desu senpai
>>8934447
Holy shit why cant I post "t b h" "f a m"
>mathematics is a group of rules and seeing what can be made as long as they are followed
how is this not just philosophy?
How is that anything like philosophy?
>>8928048
philosophy is just a bunch of made up garbage, but math is real
>>8928058
this
Assume you have 25 horses and you want to find the fastest 3 of the 25. What is the minimal number of races you can perform assuming you can only observe 5 horses racing at a time. You have no external tools and you only know the order of the horses when they finish their race.
7 races
this is a fucking easy question you dumb Amerilard
you just time them dumbass
>>8937642
It actually not.
You're assuming that the horses in the first 5 races who didn't place first aren't faster than the horses who placed first in other groups.