Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 494. page

"Recent theoretical progress indicates that spacetime and gravity emerge together from the entanglement structure of an underlying microscopic theory. These ideas are best understood in Anti-de Sitter space, where they rely on the area law for entanglement entropy. The extension to de Sitter space requires taking into account the entropy and temperature associated with the cosmological horizon. Using insights from string theory, black hole physics and quantum information theory we argue that the positive dark energy leads to a thermal volume law contribution to the entropy that overtakes the area law precisely at the cosmological horizon. Due to the competition between area and volume law entanglement the microscopic de Sitter states do not thermalise at sub-Hubble scales: they exhibit memory effects in the form of an entropy displacement caused by matter. The emergent laws of gravity contain an additional `dark' gravitational force describing the `elastic' response due to the entropy displacement. We derive an estimate of the strength of this extra force in terms of the baryonic mass, Newton's constant and the Hubble acceleration scale a_0 =cH_0, and provide evidence for the fact that this additional `dark gravity~force' explains the observed phenomena in galaxies and clusters currently attributed to dark matter."

https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02269

>>8939180
>that
>my head

I know not everything can get condensed to brainlets food.
What I think this means is
>the effects that result in net expansion only occurs at sizes too large to feasibly use.
Is that anywhere near correct?

>>8939175
You're wrong but it would take too long to explain so I'll just call it you a brainlet instead

rings

magmas are p chill

>>8938895
>What's the best?
to crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women

>>8938718
Yes they will and they'll probably overtake niggers. Africa will only catch up with Europe after new apes will take over.

>>8938718
All species undergo constant evolution, with spikes of change and periods of relative conservatism but it's still an evergoing process.

>>8938718
no
no
none
apes (and pretty much everything else) are they way they are and not like us, because they've reached an evolutionary equilibrium and settled for what they had, now we completely dominate the environment and whether deliberately or not, we will choke anything that tries to break the status quo to death.
If you don't fully follow that last part, feel free to ask, otherwise I don't feel like writing a litany if everyone gets it.

What's wrong with doing it yourself (or equivalently, paying someone you approve of to do it for you)?

>>8938645
That is the exact question being ask. What is the best way to go about such an endeavour? Also, just by posting this thread, some action is being taken.

The only response is to punish the people producing this stuff by no longer buying their products/services. Companies are afraid to piss off e.g. feminists because it causes a huge negative backlash. If we were to start creating the same backlashes, stuff like this would never happen.

>>8938495
Most of the stuff by Umberto Eco. No shit, his research, and what he does with it, is very good. Not exactly STEM, but related and impressive.

Also 'Biochemistry' by Stryer, and the 'Biochemical Pathways' posters by Boehringer (yes, the company).

And what blows my mind every time is identifying a star in the nightly sky and then looking up its wikipedia entries.

But writing a thesis on your own is what forms your mind and your ability of critical thinking the most.

>>8938495
The selfish Gene by Dawkins

"Essential readings in biosemiotics"
Favareau
Changed by worldview, after you get past the "philosophical rigor"

>>8937928
GO HUMANS GO

/pun not intended

>>8937928
This is fun. Read an intertaining manga called Hikaru no Go. Cool to see an actual game/match. Hope the humans win. I play chess as well and Deep Blue beat the reigning World Champion Gary Kasparov in the 1997/8

>>8937976
Agreed. Who is winning? I can't tell

File: 1476828244722.jpg (147KB, 749x751px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 749x751px

>>8937596
>5'11
because you're a manlet >>>/fit/

>>8937600
I'm 5'11.5

>>8937596
Check your form.
Do more reps and don't expect to go as fast as Rip claims you can.
Eat more.
Switch to dumbbells to work your stabilizers more.
Do negatives on machines as an accessory.
Get a spotter so you can break through a mental block.
Post on the right board.

>>8937377
ok.

>>8937377
Do you have a point, or did you just want everyone to know?

>>8937377
Are you going somewhere with this?

>>8935912
crushed just about all of it in my first month of work with the FAT sign on bonus i got .

I'm a senior and 80k in so far. Just posting to say that student loans are nice because 3% interest is basically free money. I feel bad for the 14% private loans. ..

>>8935919
>80k
fuckin' hell

wat

it is physics and math combined
>kinda >sometimes

>>8933325
Don't ever reply to me again unless you're contributing to the thread.

>>8933318
It's harder because you're a fucking brainlet.

t. Only A's in O Chem and A Chem

Nope, never.

>>8941377
seconded

>>8941374
what is the source of this image?

>>8941053
>>8941053
I believe. The weather changes over the last year or so are just too drastic along with the directional changes or certain bodies of water..as well as melting of permafrost in the arctic.

>>8941053
ur mom

>>8941053
I believe I deny. Or in other words I deny believing.

>>8940924
lol i don't know yes i think lol

>>8940924
>only if time travel is actually possible
>you can only travel as far back as when you invented it

>>8940924
Nice. But we don't have an infinite amount of time.

>>8940787
>I thought this was a board for smart people.
why?

>>8940791
I was tricked I guess.

>>8940795
sounds like you're as stupid as the people you're whining about

>>8940684
Why do people struggle so much with math?
People literally process and retain information differently.
Can you be born stupid?
Duh.
Did you have to study a shit ton to understand or were you naturally gifted?
99% of people will need to study even if naturally gifted. Even the great geniuses needed to study. The difference is the acceleration and ceiling of your understanding compared to normies.

>>8940687
>The difference is the acceleration and ceiling of your understanding compared to normies.
Yeah but why does that happen? Is it bound to genetics? Interest?

>>8940684
>Why do people struggle so much with math?
because you don't really need it in average life. so the brain turns it off.