I'll start with the Cantor Step Function - continuous everywhere, derivative exists almost everywhere, but it always 0.
The identity function
Constant functions cuz the don't give a fuck what you plug in
>>8943795
how is it constructed my nigga?
>>8943795
Isn't that impossible? I remember that if a function's derivative is 0 for every x in R and is continuous than the function is constant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRSBaq3vAeY
This could be revolutionary.
There are more experiments being done to verify this and the results are promising so far.
What's /sci/'s take on this phenomenon?
>>8943718
this looks like an image from that meme, and therefore, i deem this entire topic a meme.
saged
>>8943718
1) misqoting people
2) they don't know how a fourier transform works
3) the charts imply that "non meditators" have the opposite effect with almost the same confidence.
Yes consciousness affects matter, it's called EEG, or fMRI, or moving your hand.
this is bullshit.
>>8943771
Please reply only after you have actually watched the video
What's up with all the normies going on keto diets?
This seems like a fucking pseudoscience to me, can somebody elaborate is this effective?
So much fat can't be good for organism.
It's basically: no excess sugar because
>Le bad
But actually most of our achievements as the dominant species lies in a fuck ton of sugar and in recent years of history caffeine
Because it's a healthy diet that is easy to maintain. With minimum carbs blood sugar/insulin levels don't wiggle that much, so there are no cravings.
t. fatass with a sweet-tooth
>>8943447
I would usually expect excessive amount of fat would clog the shit out of your arteries.
Can someone reply is it pseudoscience or not?
They have a subreddit called ketoscience but it lacks actual sources badly.
Let us say it creates a new universe from quarks or whatever smallest particle is.
That depends from the resolution of the simulation brainlet. I just simulated the whole universe with my android phone, in wich each galaxy was a bit.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekenstein_bound
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremermann%27s_limit
Basically, you can't simulate a clone of a universe inside itself unless you zip away parts of it.
>>8942620
7.5
What comes after death /sci/?
I, personally, believe it's the same thing prior to birth.
I like to think of human beings as a twirling dandelion in the wind that sails for a bit and then comes back down.
>>8941721
You wake up and it turns out you're living in a dyson sphere orbiting a black hole. You're entire life was nothing more than an hour of play.
>>8941721
The skeptical part of my brain says what you said but the part that likes consciousness says there's something more to it. But then where does everybody else's conscious go and if we lack the physical means to communicate (mouth eyes etc) then would we just exist forever alone? That sounds terrifying. But the conscious mind cannot experience nonexistence; that's a fallacy. Maybe your conscious just loops itself forever or something. The patrician answer is to wake up frozen people and interview them, as only they would have been physically dead long enough to settle that question once and for all (at least until people in Christianity argue that they were revived before the end times and thus would not have experienced the resurrection yet.)
Which is why cryonics and life extension are good memes. We get an answer and a (slight) workaround if the results are unfavorable.
>>8941773
I don't believe logical fallacies can be put on death.
The conscious mind stops being conscious. It stops being a mind entirely.
I don't know why people over-complicate it.
We're not different from trees or rocks, etc.
Einstein said time was an illusion, but we now know it isn't? Do we know why time seems to only be physically capable of travel on a single dimension?
Is it just the human brain not being capable of perceiving time in multiple directions?
(((Einstein)))
>>8941719
I've been trying to base my life and (lack of) faith in life being purposeful on his quotes; should I not or are you just being /pol/?
>>8941714
Time is a concept, not a real thing.
Has anyone here actually read this?
Like actually read it, and not simply get their opinion from a hysterical lefty blog?
If so, what is your own opinion on it?
I just listened to Murray on Sam Harris's podcast, and thought his reasoning throughout was very sound and dispassionate. Obviously it's inevitable that the part about race would be highly controversial, but it's not the whole book, and if anything he prescribes a more individualist view of society, rather than judging people's talents solely on their shared genes.
It's kind of annoying that college kids who weren't even born in 1994 lump this guy in with the likes of Ann Coulter and Milo Yiannapoulos, without even giving him a chance to speak.
Btw, this is not /pol/ bait; I'm a solid lefty myself. I just can't stand aggressive, self-righteous ignorance.
Planning on picking it up after my exams are finished. The podcast really opened my eyes, the only thing I had been told about IQ before hand was the 'not a good measure of intelligence' meme
Also they do dance around the non-whites/Asians having lower IQ, talking on variance etc., but it really feels like a potentially strong argument for supremacy.
>>8939664
Yes, and Sam does push back a little on that, asking what would be the point of proving such a variance in average IQ between groups, other than to provide support (unintentionally or not) to racist causes. Murray's central argument is that any such variance is largely irrelevant in the face of individual capability.
This thread is for questions that don't deserve their own thread.
Tips:
>provide context
>show partial work
>use wolframalpha.com and stackexchange.com
was thinking why is the bond strength between H2 higher than that between F2?
How long would it take to complete the following:
Algebra and Trigonometry - Judith Beecher
Elementary Calculus - Keisler
Matrices and Linear Algebra" by Schneider and Barker
This group is spreading false information regarding cancer causing people to refuse proven tx in lieu of buying into their narrative. Please help expose them. Idk how to do this but I have read enough about 4chan to know there are intelligent people here who can make a difference.
Was Tesla right?
Dumb old guard.
>>8935172
>Tesla
>Dumb
Pick one.
>>8935176
*picks two*
So why isn't developing a better battery like the biggest priority right now? It would solve so many problems with electric vehicles, emerging tech, and global warming (by making fossil fuels unnecessary).
>>8934984
Electric is a meme the energy density will never beat fuel, the only use for electric is virtue signaling for rich people.
>>8935008
>*Current energy density
ftfy. Also electric engines are much more efficient.
>>8934984
What do you think car companys are doing right this second? Sitting with their fingers up their bungholes? Of course improving battery technology is their top priority on the tech research side.
The other day my Chem prof put pic related at the first power-point slide of a lecture, I'm not used to having randomly politics shoved into science, every 3rd lecture he yarns about how Trump is going to ruin everything for Scientists, global warming basically every contemporary issue in modern science is at risk of being sullied by Trump.
What's phams opinion of politics in relation to science?
Where does your political compass sit?
Do you think its ok to bring up political issues in the scientific community or should it be barred to preserve the objectivity and rigor of the scientific community?
This topics even more relevant now because of the whole Bill Nye gender abacus, ice cream orgy bullocks.
Sometimes, yea. There is things that directly affect science such as budgets, permits for proyects and research and public education. Shoehorning your political beliefs to students is just annoying though, but professors can't see where their egos end.
No one should really care about Bill Nye.
I'm a prof and I think others feel like it's not "political" per se because Trump wants to cut their funding. I disagree but I think that's how they feel. Most of them hate Trump for way more reasons than the funding. They just use the funding issue to claim that Trump attacked them.
At the end of the day they're just another group of people whining about how they want money. I want money too but I won't stoop to that
>>8933827
Well politic and science can actually be quite intricated.
Science sometimes need money, large scale and risky project, whi can be granted by politics. It can impact society on such point it become a political problem. Sometime, politics use science to justify a given policy.
In short, there's no hard boundary between those two. Just like with anything and politic, tbqh.
My political compass points to whoever is the most apt to respond to the ecological problems we created.
As i said, it's illusional to think science is hermetics to politics. And yeah, sometimes it's the right thing to do ti bring politics in it. Do you really want to test that new-gen reactor who would wipe th entire country if it fails ? Maybe non-scientist, whose live may be at stakes, have a word in it ?
This topic is relevant, yeah. Bill Nye is not.
Also, regarding your first question ; as a teacher i ALWAYS warn my student about the diverse political ramification of every subject. They're future engineer, they must know that and be able to think critically about what they do. I always make sure to represent all sides of the argument and not dictate thel what to think, but more "how" to think.
That's what i feel every prof should do. Some colleagues hates me for not pushing their agenda tho (on both sides of the political spectrum tho)
Is there really any point of bringing man to mars?
Sounds like a big waste of money to me
>>8932533
In Mars you could rape that hot Japanese astronaut in the pic and nobody on Earth would know it until the radio message asking for help gets to Earth, which would take weeks, months even if you do it in the right moment. It would take another few years until Earth sends a rescue mission to Mars. By then she'd have already accepted her faith as concubine and you two would have given birth to the first Martians.
>>8932548
Signing for trials now.
No. If it's for economic gain we'll eventually run out of resources and opportunities there as well. If it's to ensure the survival of human species, Mars is not only more hostile to life but it's also inevitable that humans there destroy themselves much like those on Earth would.
Look up "uniform dots grid" on google images. Look at the images of skin.
What is it? There are plenty of forum posts on dermatology and webmd type websites, to even conspiracy websites, but nobody has a decent explanation for the cause of the condition.
Is it ayys? is it the government? Is it chickenpox 2.0 made into a supervirus because of vaccines? Why does it look so unnatural? Have you had this condition?
>>8946249
btw, I posted this in /x/ earlier, but didn't get many responses. I want to see if sci has a possible explanation.
Probably leaning on something or whatever caused those to form was contact with an artificial structure, like a computer chair or such.
>>8946357
No. I don't think that's the case. If you look it up, a lot of people have had this condition, and all(as far as I've seen) have said that they hadn't came into contact with any object that could have caused it. I'm pretty sure you would know if you had, considering it is a unique pattern.
>he fell for the non-gmo meme
>despite there being absolutely no evidence that genetically modified food is harmful
>without genetic engineering we'd have much less food and ultimately starve
>he fell for the gluten-free meme
>despite the whole "gluten intolerance" thing being a gigantic hoax (the person that started it admitted it was bullshit)
>removing gluten from your diet can have harmful effects on your body such as weight gain, loss of energy, etc.
Why are people so gullible? Seriously, what's the next asinine pseudo-science dieting trend gonna be? Dehydrated food? Fiber-free diets? Sugar-free sugar? None of this shit makes any damn sense.
>without genetic engineering we'd have much less food and ultimately starve
You mean that 3rd worlders will die? How is this a bad thing? Less indians and africans and earth is a better place.
There was no evidence of tobacco use being harmful for nearly 300 years.
>>8945311
>>despite the whole "gluten intolerance" thing being a gigantic hoax (the person that started it admitted it was bullshit)
Yea gluten intolerance is bullshit but celiac disease is not
What is your contribution to Physics and Science community except stupid frog posting?
I didn't shoot up all their dumbfuck young while tutoring Analysis for Physicists.
>>8945112
>muh textbook collecting
is this the best you can do? lmao
can I find a batch of physics, math, programming and engineering books from libgen somewhere to download in case it inevitably shuts down?