[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 46. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: because yes.png (11KB, 603x437px) Image search: [Google]
because yes.png
11KB, 603x437px
Tell me a number between 0.999... and 1

why are /b/ faggots still trying to find one?
102 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
Just put a 9 before your first 9
>>
>>9155471
then it would still be 0.999...
>>
>>9155473
Then just put a 9 before the first 9 there

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (146KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault (1).jpg
146KB, 1280x720px
I was told you guys are experts on this topic so here goes. Okay /sci/, do humans have a part in climate change or not? People tell me humans are responsible, while others say that it's natural, and other people say it's a bit of both. What's /sci/'s consensus?
68 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
/sci/'s consensus is that there isn't one.
>>
Both but not proportionally
>>9155114
/pol/ post
>>
>>9155109
Why is it hard to believe that pumping CO2 into the air causes global warming via the greenhouse effect, which is a well documented phenomena? Anyone who denies global warming is man-made either has ulterior motives or thinks he is fighting the good fight against liberals.

File: fd6.jpg (145KB, 459x366px) Image search: [Google]
fd6.jpg
145KB, 459x366px
If you woke up one day and discovered you'd time traveled backwards two thousand years, would you be able to use your knowledge of the future to invent anything useful?
>tfw I literally don't know how to build anything with material substance because I'm a software developer brainlet and in a world without electronic computers I would have zero utility for society
90 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
tfw you couldn't even make an internal combustion engine for a caveman because he hasn't invented metal yet and you know f/a about smelting... or carburretors...fml
>>
File: WhiteWineGrapes.jpg (89KB, 640x559px) Image search: [Google]
WhiteWineGrapes.jpg
89KB, 640x559px
“The Vintner”

After getting horribly drunk on a radical new brew he made, a homebrewer ends up in the distant past (3,000 B.C.E.) and must time travel through various times to return to his own time.

Like Sliders and Quantum Leap mixed in a bottle, where the “hero” must get completely passed out drunk in order to advance to the next era in civilization. It will not work with the same brew twice. He must make a new brew that does not exist in that era for it to work. He becomes responsible for many of the more famous/staple brews in civilization. General exploits follow each episode in trying to create a new brew in that era with ingredients in whatever random location and time he ends up in. His drunken time traveling leaves him hung over and with a fuzzy memory between his time traveling trips. The story line focuses heavily on solving other people’s problems through alcohol and knowledge he attained when not hung over and asleep during college lectures.

He finally makes it back to his time, only to get drunk at a party after mixing up a new drink out of habit and ends up passed out, on a busy highway, while hover cars zoom just inches over him. That being the last scene of the last episode.
>>
>>9153422
Regardless of what you were able to do, you would probably be put to death for being possessed because of speaking in tongues (as 'English' back then was completely different), and for creating things that could only be the work of the devil as far as they knew.

File: IMG_6631.png (34KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_6631.png
34KB, 250x250px
So we all know that pornography fucks up your brain, it fucks up your reward system etc. But how bad is erotic literature? It certainly needs more imagination to "work" but how bad is it really?
9 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>9159472
>So we all know that pornography fucks up your brain
That's a matter of perspective, bud. And has it been proven from any perspective anyway?
>>
>>9159472
>So we all know that pornography fucks up your brain, it fucks up your reward system etc
Do you have an actual source for that?
>>
>>9159621
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1874574?=

Similar to theories taken from addiction research, it has been speculated in popular science literature that pornography constitutes a prewired, naturally rewarding stimulus and that high levels of exposure result in a downregulation or habituation of the neural response in the reward network. This is assumed to elicit adaptive processes in which the brain is hijacked, becoming less responsive to pornography.11There is common agreement that the neural substrates of addiction consist of brain areas that are part of the reward network such as midbrain dopamine neurons, the striatum, and the prefrontal cortex.12,13The striatum is assumed to be involved in habit formation when drug use progresses towards compulsive behavior.14The ventral striatum in particular has been shown to be involved in cue-reactivity processing of various drugs of abuse15but also in processing of novelty.16Compromised prefrontal cortex function is among the major neurobiological modifications discussed in the research on substance abuse disorders common in humans and animals.17In studies on pharmacological addiction in humans, volumetric alterations have been shown in the striatum and prefrontal cortex.

cont.

File: where are proofs.png (662KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
where are proofs.png
662KB, 1280x720px
>a 15+-year-old cartoon has a proven academically published mathematical theorem
8 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: laugh.jpg (18KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]
laugh.jpg
18KB, 600x450px
>still browsing a Taiwanese basket weaving bbs catalogue
>>
>>9159435
>>9159439
And you guys try to act superior. Pathetic.
>>
>a group of Math PhDs writing random proofs for their widely recognized TV show to amuse themselves get published
It's not THAT hard to be published, you know.

File: IMG_0769.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0769.jpg
1MB, 2448x3264px
Is this possible? Can you find energy levels for a potential well of a singularity?
>pic semi related
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
I know the well is infinite and non uniform at the top, as apposed to an ordinary potential well that is uniform from top to bottom, but maybe with set theory?
>>
looks like turdlets leaving an anus.
>>
>>9159380
>asking serious physics questions in sci
>not realizing it's just a bunch of high school kids and engineers

but to be serious, no clue man. I never solved problems similar to these (though I'm afraid this might be a quantum-gravity problem...)

File: 20170613_005414.jpg (2MB, 2576x1932px) Image search: [Google]
20170613_005414.jpg
2MB, 2576x1932px
Does /sci/ like slide rules?
7 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
no i have a calculator
>>
>>9159375

I have one but I don't know how to use it!

I also have an abacus and a compass set.
>>
File: dsc2044.jpg (2MB, 6048x4032px) Image search: [Google]
dsc2044.jpg
2MB, 6048x4032px
>>9159375
no thanks i have a smartphone
>abacus and a compass
no thanks i have a smart phone

please step aside for the best invention still useful today, and give a big round of applause for,,,
the scale

File: pile-of-books[1].jpg (96KB, 500x305px) Image search: [Google]
pile-of-books[1].jpg
96KB, 500x305px
What's the best proven way to memorize information, whether in large or small amounts?
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Method of Loci
>>
>>9159348
Probably spaced repition with a tool like Mnemosyne or equivalent.
>>
>>9159348

I play quizzes on sporcle frequently and have memorized or internalized the following:

countries of the world
flags of the world
periodic table
-dozens of other lists of geographical information

I'm fairly good at memorization, is my point, though it can be a dull activity of course. Depending on the information to be memorized, I've noticed a few things that work for me:

-divide and conquer. Break a large list of information down into like 2-5 things at a time, based on each small group having some definite relationship to each other that the rest don't have. Get that one figured out and drill it a bit, then keep going. You know you've got everything in "that" group once you've counted up to 3,4,5, whatever it happens to be (you store this number as well).

Example: what are the five african countries right around Lake Victoria (a great big lake) in east africa? Answer: Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, Burundi. CONTEXT: note the generally vowel-ending african-sounding names of each one. Rwanda was that place where they had that big genocide in the Clinton years. Uganda had Idi Amin, and Kenya is known to be relatively stable by African standards.

The latter notes lead me to my next point: contextualize. Give it at least one other connection to something else that you know or have heard about in life. In the above case, I "personify" the countries, by relating them to news coverage-one-line history that I know. Take Americium, an obscure actinide in the periodic table: this is the stuff in a smoke detector that makes the thing go off when there's too much smoke. That's literally the only other thing I know about it.

A third possibility deserves greater exploitation and should actually be taught, if not having specific examples given in class: The Dirty Mnemonic. Years ago, a comedy program gave the following:

Phylum-Class-Order-Family-Genus-Species: Please Come Over For Gay Sex

I have never forgotten it since.

File: kotonoha-no-niwa-full-1515916.jpg (687KB, 1366x766px) Image search: [Google]
kotonoha-no-niwa-full-1515916.jpg
687KB, 1366x766px
I have been reading so many random articles about "World ending" Or "Climate change will kill us soon" I want to know /SCI/ view just cause, I believe we can adapt to this climate change and survive but maybe I am just dumb.
14 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
> I believe we can adapt to this climate change and survive but maybe I am just dumb.
We can, but it'll be damn expensive.
>>
Of course we can adapt; we're human.

Doomsayers are overplaying their hand. It's traditional community vs corporate oversight issues only on a global scale. Which makes it extremely awkward and touchy because it's not just a matter of internal politics, but the competitive global economy.
>>
>>9159296
>I have been reading so many random articles about "World ending" Or "Climate change will kill us soon"
No you haven't. Can you stop lying, faggot?

So I just finished my Calculus test, and did it really good. But the thing is that before the test we are forced to do "Test of basic knowledge"
>30min
>10 short problems
>6/10 is a pass

On that test there was a question to circle the true statements and one of the statements was
>Every sequence of numbers has an accumulation point

Me ofcourse remembering a clear example of
[latex] a_{n}=n [\latex]
didn't sircle it

But it appears that every sequence does have an accumulation point, but not in [latex] \mathbb{R} [\latex] but in [latex] \bar{\mathbb{R}} [\latex].

How do I prove them that the thing is open to interpretation, my professors are known for being strict. They never stated that it's in [latex] \bar{\mathbb{R}} [\latex]. I need good compelling theorems/evidence that I am right.
Is the Weierstrass theorem a good point to start ?
8 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
wtf is [math] \bar{\mathbb{R}} [/math]
>>
>>9159236
that is
[math] \mathbb{R} \cup \left \{ -\infty, \infty\right \} [/math]
>>
Oh yes, forgot to mention

On that test, I got 5/10, I need to somehow get this point to so that my actual test will be valid

File: 1468795484682.gif (486KB, 387x368px) Image search: [Google]
1468795484682.gif
486KB, 387x368px
Quantum mechanics so far seems to have only two solid rules:
>various properties, such as energy, have no net change
>communication must go forwards in time and be no faster than light
It doesn't say how various properties must be conserved though; and so particles are constantly created, destroyed, and transmuted.

But what strikes me as odd is that events cannot simply create any particle that causes the net change of various properties to be zero.

For example, an electron can't split into two half-mass, half-charge electrons; and particles can't arbitrarily change their mass and charge by shedding a particle with properties opposite to the change.

e.g. a down quark can lose an electron and become an up quark, but it can't emit a particle with a third of the mass and charge of an electron to become a neutral quark.
Where does nature get its library of particles from?
17 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>9159088
7000 years ago mathematicians got together to decide how the universe worked to keep the physics brainlets busy so that they don't bother us with our research and we just decided on the particles and how they act by chance. We made an infinite list of possible particle sets and rules that would equivalently create an universe like this and then we played a round robbin Go tournament. The winner got to pick which particles made it to the actual universe.
>>
>>9159088
>communication no faster than light
isn't that wrong re:spooky action at a distance? thats partly why einstein hated quantum physics.
>>
>>9159088
Discrete math ie real math is as old as Zeno's paradox. The Anthropic Principle implies a retrocausality that completely explains physical laws, does it not? And there is also the retrocausality of human intelligence that happens within Physics, does it not count? And let's say Nature is all there is, it has to get its library of particles from somewhere, so it must get it from itself, that is, again, retrocausality. Any too big of a gap so far?

>communication must go forwards in time and be no faster than light
So not really, that is a not from Quantum Mechanics, otherwise there wouldn't even be the EPR paradox.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox

File: Coleoptera.jpg (308KB, 703x1023px) Image search: [Google]
Coleoptera.jpg
308KB, 703x1023px
Which is the science field that requires the most Autism per square meter (A/m^2) and why is it Entomology?
>The Coleoptera, with about 400,000 species, is the largest of all orders, constituting almost 40% of described insects and 25% of all known animal life-forms; new species are discovered frequently. The largest of all families, the Curculionidae (weevils) with some 70,000 member species, belongs to this order.
400,000 described species
new species being described everyday
10 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>9158948
Can someone tell me if there's an online database with all the descriptions so you can cross reference and search things?
>>
Bugs are why I got into science but it didn't pursue it unfortunately.
>>
entomology is the dankers
>>9158967
https://www.ent.iastate.edu/list/directory/120/vid/4
>>9158989
I've always fancied entomology as well. I stopped wanting to be an entomologist by profession when i was around 5 and moved towards marine biology. As an adult ive concentrated on ecology, i can make the most out of my lifelong taxonomy autism in ecology.

File: IMG_4507.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_4507.jpg
2MB, 4032x3024px
unrelated pic: a section of an actuarial exam study manual for the 4th exam that I am currently cramming for. (Using the convolution method to find aggregate loss)

so I have a question I have a random string with 207 characters that supposedly has an email address in it.

I'm currently brainstorming methods to try and find this email address like splitting up and comparing all lowercase and uppercase segments of the string or splitting the string in equal segments of characters and looking for words / phrases.

Any thoughts?
9 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Any theory, equation you have in mind to discover the email?
>>
>>9158947
Are numbers involved in your set of characters?
>>
>>9159054
no, pure alphabetical

So what about an "infinite set"? Well, to begin with you should say precisely what the term means.
Okay if you don't, at least someone should. Putting an adjective in front of a noun does not in itself make a mathematical concept.
Cantor declared that an "infinite set" is a set which is not finite. Surely that is unsatisfactory, as Cantor no doubt suspected himself. It's like declaring that an "all-seeing Leprechaun" is a Leprechaun which can see everything. Or an unstoppable mouse is a mouse which cannot be stopped. These grammatical constructions do not create concepts, except perhaps in literary or poetic sense. It is not clear that there are any sets that are not finite, just as it's not clear that there are any Leprechauns which can see everything, or that there are mice which cannot be stopped.
Certainly in science there is no reason to suppose that "infinite sets" exist. Are there and infinite number of quarks or electrons in the universe? If physicists had to hazard a guess, I am confident that the majority would say: No. But even if there were an infinite number of electrons it's unreasonable to suppose that you can get an infinite number of them all together as a single data object
44 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>a thread died for this
>>
>>9158896
>neither I, nor my friends understand the concept, therefore the concept doesn't exist
>>
>>9158896
>pooinloojuan
>enlightened

File: 1464496397931.gif (3MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]
1464496397931.gif
3MB, 200x200px
How did an inanimate object evolve into the first living thing?
28 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>9158798
Depends where you want to draw the line between inanimate and animate
>>
lightning
>>
>>9158798
are viruses living? depending on your definition an intermediate structure similar to a virus could be considered a middle step between an empty phospholipid bi-layer and a replicating, living, respirating cell

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.