What are some /sci/ approved MOS's in the army
>inb4 shoudve joined the air force
Pic related is asvab score
Finish your degree and go into OCS as a scientist. Pretty comfy career path. Your boss will probably be a civilian.
>>8961036
my father scored a bit higher than you and got invited to certain programs. you may as well, just wait a bit, it will be worth it if you get invited.
What did he mean by this?
whoah budddeh
>>8960959
A mathematical proof which immediatley rests upon about 5-6 previous statements (which themselves presumably rely on ancestral statements, etc) in order to establish that something like 1+1 = 2 is valid.
>>8960959
How many is 2?
The first Scientific Revolution was when Galileo made science quantitative, the second Scientific Revolution was when X-Rays were popularized by Roentgen's experiment and people started to probe what they see, so I'm wondering what you guys think would be the next Scientific Revolution. I think it will be facilitation and execution of warp theory and how humanity will be able to explore where they haven't been before.
go back to bed Roentgen
>>8960943
Agreed.
So /sci/, is there some merit to this...?
http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/mfspears/
Capacitance Theory of Gravity
"Abstract: Every object or particle floating in space has capacitance to its background and to other objects or particles. For electrically energized objects or particles, capacitance establishes the ratio of charge-to-voltage, but needs neither charge nor voltage to exist. It is part of the fundamental nature of the universe. Yet capacitance is rarely, if ever, included in theories of basic forces and fields. This book demonstrates some of the profound effects of capacitance, establishing correct qualitative and precise quantitative characteristics of gravity as confirmed by the many empirical observations and measurements made through the years. "
>>8960916
It's more "electric universe" nonsense.
Hmmmm...
rrrriiiight
Is plasma considered its own state of matter, or is it just a type of gas?
Why ask a question here that wikipedia can answer for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)
SAGE
>>8960631
Announcing a sage is against the rules.
REPORT
>>8960637
What if he just wanted to call himself a sage while handing out sage-like advice
5@G3
Is there a trivial way to identify all the cycles of a graph using its adjacency and/or incidence matrices?
yes, but I'm gonna degrade you for asking such a fucking trivial question
just take the trace of the nth power of the adjacency matrix to identify all cycles of length n. the nth power of the adjacency matrix at location i,j gives you the number of paths from i to j, so just use that on the diagonal, you fucking degenerate. learn to Google before you post fifth like this, just type "cycle adjacency matrix", jesus
>>8960610
I deserve it, spent a few hours trying to solve it without incidence matrix and when I thought about using that just got lazy didn't want to spend any more time thinking
I have 500 grams of material in solution (citric acid being the solution) and I had been trying to "wash" my material off with 3 gallons (11 liters) of steaming hot distilled water and it still wouldn't "come off" (liquid still turns yellow after going through that much distilled water) whats going on here? Is there a way to remedy this? If you are wondering what my "material" is, I would not wish to disclose it due to patent reasons
>>8960566
You mean citric acid is just part of the solution or has it reacted with the solute?
Also what kind of vessel is this?
Citric acid isn't yellow btw.
>>8960573
the citric acid is part of the solution and did reacted with my material in question hence why the solution comes out yellow when its is being washed out (microwave radiation being the catalyst). I'm not sure which vessel you are talking about but I am using a buchner funnel to catch my material and my vacuum flask to catch my solution
Depends on what your "material" is and how it reacted with the citric acid. Is it a coordination complex?
What's wrong with this?
>>8960481
Branch jumping.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_branch
>Polish
>Android
>retarded
not surprises here
>>8960481
when it goes from line 3 to line 4. thats incorrect and breaks the product rule. The product rule by definition only works for radicals when the numbers are positive
Hello /sci/ could you recommend some books for me? I'm interested in : Precalculus
Calculus I II and III
Thanks. Your Anon
>>8960421
https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Mathematics-Serge-Lang/dp/0387967877
https://www.amazon.com/First-Course-Calculus-Undergraduate-Mathematics/dp/0387962018
https://www.amazon.com/Calculus-Several-Variables-Undergraduate-Mathematics/dp/0387964053
If quarks come in pairs, how do protons and neutrons have 3 quarks?
>>8960379
god works in shitty ways
>>8960379
AFAIK confinement only says that quarks can only be observed in bound states.
>>8960379
2*3 = 3*2
I'm having an issue with our old friend Newton. If F=ma and we set a equal to g shouldn't a falling object hit the ground with the same amount of force regardless of the starting height because while the speed changed, acceleration remained constant.
>>8960284
No, [math] F=ma [/math] would give the force acting on the particle as it falls. You'd then have to use it again to find the force that the particle hits the ground with, ie. [math] a [/math] here would be come the deceleration from some speed [math] v [/math] to 0.
>>8960286
I get you. That makes sense
A muscle can be mentally contructed, and then liberated, similar to the objects that are held and released from the muscle. An object thrown is first under a great injection of power, and then it is alone (in a submissive sense; without you).
Thrown objects can take flight or glide given the appropriate curvature and aerodynamic...
Dud-weaponry can be created.
Fake water. Fake cloud. Fake aggression. Electric weapons. More.
Probably already known.
EMP Shields. EMP Generators.
Thank you
coralshape.com
>>8960204
oh my god, he's discovered basic projectile motion! Whatever shall we do?
What's the part of math where you study complicated polynomials and how they behave?
what do you mean by complicated and behave, and polynomials with what coefficients?
>>8960158
>behave
Lol u mean how they look when you type it into your graphing calculator?
>>8960158
Algebraic geometry