What the fuck is this bullshit. These are the models for population growth using scramble and contest competition. P is population, r is growth rate, K is carrying capacity of an environment. Scramble competition assumes random allocation of food and grows to carrying capacity (K) and then levels out. No problem.
The second one is the model for contest competition. Fuck you Beverton-Holt, because that CLEARLY converges to r/2, not K. In what fucking universe does that work?
Growth rate = 1.5, carrying capacity=1000. Converges on 500. Im so fucking butthurt.
>>8965849
P(t) = K/(1+(K-P0/P0)*e^-kt)
I'm not sure but I think this is it
>>8965870
*e^-rt
Red pill me on khan academy
>>8965806
nothing to redpill about.
Good training wheels. Sometimes gives good entry-level insight, but won't give you mastery. Khan is a purple pilled conspiracy theorist.
>>8965806
Great way to start learning something but god bless you if you think you can achieve mastery using that thing.
>tfw imposter syndrome in school
>constant fear of being accused of plagiarism even though I did the work and understand the material
>tfw professor compliments my lab papers and how I have a better understanding than most
>feel guilty
>>8965657
stupid little anime bitch
nice post anon, better than most!
>tfw feel bad when I succeed and worse when I fail
>tfw reading about long fasts
>tfw reading about autophagy
>tfw it cures so many disseases
>tfw the jew science and jew health industry don't promote it because they can't profit off it
>tfw pol was right again about jews
A thread died for this shit.
Are subatomic particles a good example of an infinite regress?
>>8965500
Considering there are fundamental particles, no.
>>8965506
they are, until we start colliding at 10x the current energies and find even more fundamental ones
I've heard people argue it's .5 heritable and that its a balance of both, but I've also seen people claim its at around a .7-.8 heritability. Sorry for the shit thread information wise, i don't know much about it but I'm wondering what /sci/'s take is on it
Define intelligence
>>8965484
IQ I guess? I've heard IQ tests are the best way we have now to determine someone's "intelligence." Google says
>the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.
Again, I apologize for being a brainlet
>>8965488
here's an interesting research about IQ being a accurate measure of intelligence
http://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(12)00584-3?_returnURL=http%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0896627312005843%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&cc=y=
What did they mean by this?
https://sattrackcam.blogspot.nl/2017/06/close-encounters-of-classified-kinda.html
>Something odd happened a few days ago, high above our heads. In an earlier blogpost, I discussed in detail how the odd spy satellite USA 276 (2017-022A) was set to make a peculiarly close approach to the International Space Station ISS on 3 June 2017. The spy satellite was recently launched for the NRO as NROL-76 by SpaceX, on 1 May 2017.
https://vimeo.com/220455745
Maybe so they could spy on the Ruskies with it. That's why ISS has such a high inclination, because Baikonur. Or maybe China.
>>8965552
this doesnt explain the close proximity to ISS.
>>8965465
>>6.4 +- 2 km
Bullshit. No way anything is flying that close to the ISS
Does anyone remember the prophecy of the wise man of the trees?
Serious question, this is about muh singularity.
Illustrate a 4 dimensional representation in 3-space of a cuboid whose boundary points are closer in 3-space to one another than to a point at the center of the cuboid.
>>8965406
How can there be 4D space if the earth is flat?
>>8965426
Too late. We already went in the fifth dimension. The earth is now a sphere (except we are on the inside).
If developing Artificial General Intelligence and likely Artificial Super Intelligence soon after, how would one contain it without risking the outside world?
By hiding it up your asshole.
In the future, would it be possible to genetically engineer a human to be a vampire? Like:
>doesn't age
>can stay alive for centuries
>super-human strength
>needs to drink blood to function
>exposure to sunlight is lethal
>is allergic to garlic
>can't be seen in mirrors or other reflective surfaces such as water
>can communicate with wolves
Asking for a friend.
No.
>>8965318
Blood is extremely low in nutritional value and chock full of pathogens. Just man up and become a cannibal. Don't eat the brain, tho.
>>8965318
>Don't eat the brain, tho.
w-why not
Any Idea if we have any possible upcoming natural disasters that are capable of killing a couple thousand? like mt saint helens chance of it erupting or another 2004 or 2011 tsunami?
I know it sounds fucked but I could really go for some good natural disaster footage right about now.
>TFW you will never see krakatoa like eruption.
feels.
>>8965312
Yellowstone.
>>8965317
Odds are we'll all be long dead before Yellowstone ever erupts again, if it ever does. (Some eruption will be the last, it might be the most recent one.)
Better bet for OPs question is to watch cities like Naples, or Portland, that sit next to volcanoes with a history of pyroclastic flows and explosions and shit. Not all of them will erupt any time soon, some of them may never erupt again -- but there are enough of them around that one might go before you, me and OP run out of time.
>>8965317
>Yellowstone
fucks yellowstone? pleb here
If every delicacy of reptile tastes like chicken, does that mean chickens are descendants of dinosaurs?
>>8965289
I've never had a reptile that tasted like chicken.
>>8965289
chickens are dinosaurs
dinosaurs are reptiles
chickens are reptiles
We already know chickens are descendants of dinosaurs, all birds are
WTF I hate asians now
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15611
>>8965254
There's no point in caring about plastic waste when you're dying of hunger,malnutrition or preventable diseases.
>now
>>8965254
Why? It's state actors, world bankers, and foreign direct investors who are to blame.
Why does technology advance over time? Im not sure if this question is more scientific or philosophical but I'll ask here. When will technology stop advancing?
frogposting should be a bannable offence.
frogposts are invariably made by morons anyway.
>>8965231
It's a legitimate question. also Pepe is in a thinking pose in this image so it fits.
>>8965227
Remember that during the Middle Ages the technology regressed then stagnated for a long period of time until Renascence.
During the Latter Middle Age the Black Death Pandemic killed one third of Europe Population.
The technology not always advance over time.
Our technological society can also collapse if a Nuclear War destroy us.