Motivation > IQ
Correct
Also, Motivation and Laziness are genetic
>>8984626
Sauce?
>>8984627
Most traits are partly genetic.
Just google it.
Is there a relationship between races people watch and intelligence.
Like are people who watch Formula smarter than people who watch nascar
>>8984384
There is no relation between race and intelligence. We are all 100% equal.
>>8984384
Murrifats don't watch formula and yuropoors don't watch Nascar. Correlation is possible but not necessarily causation
>>8984410
Nah man I mean car races
>just work harder™ anon
>you can't do 5 classes and extracurriculars in one semester? you're doing it wrong anon
>look anon I don't sleep well, only 2 hours per night because I have to work harder™
What the fuck is wrong with these people? They're fucking common in universities, just look at ivies, MIT.
Is even possible to be productive in these situations?
Who cares just be glad you arent going to die someday ohwait.
You're just a brainlet.
I took 7 upper-level classes last semester and still managed to have a social life and do research.
Classes are honestly not difficult if you're good at what you're studying.
>>8984278
t. Humanity scum
What would happen within the first 24 hours?
We'd have an Arrival situation, or we would be annihilated.
>>8979789
Ufoporno
>>8979789
I'd fap 3-4 times.
why is there something rather than nothing?
>>8987660
no, the real question for all those rationalists is answer what do they mean by why
>>8987660
why 'why'
why does there have to be a purpose or meaning assigned to something? can it not just be as is. there is no answer to this.
>>8987663
For what reason, or what explanation, is there something rather than nothing?
She says theres pain when she moves her arm and that its burning. It's been about 16 hours since it started.
Need geographic location
Doesn't look like a bee sting at first glance, looks more like a wasp
just clean it with running water and soap
All insect stings ever
We need more pics to examine her whole body for more stings
Is 0 a number?
>>8985206
No, it's a meta-number.
>>8985206
No. It's a limit, like infinity.
The fact that mathematicians allow 0 to be plugged into formula is bullshit.
>>8985206
In CS lol.
>grades don't measure intelligence, they measure obedience!
>school doesn't give you "real" knowledge
>>8983203
>work hard on every homework assignment like a good boy
>still struggle keeping up because you're a bit of a brainlet
>frogpost on /sci/
Keep your head up OP, you can get places with hard work alone even if your brain doesn't work so well
>>8983203
Grades ideally reflect how well you understand and retain material covered in a course. That says nothing about intelligence.
>what goes up MUST come down
Bravo Newton, good job we would never have figured that one out without ya!
>>8978497
That's not even true.
>time flies when you're having a run
Fucking seriously?
>>8978526
Its when you're having fun, dickshit
What reason would an elephant have to save a buffalo from a lion in the wild? Do they have hierarchies of other animals or something or are they just fending off mutual predators or what?
>>8987268
There is way too much oil on that hummus. Also way too many chick peas.
>>8987272
Olive oil is never too much, but the chick peas... why though? Hummus is chick peas.
t. lebanese
>>8987268
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Elephants be like, I gotchoo niguuuuh
First, suppose S is an ordered field with the LUB property, take A, a nonempty subset of S bounded above and below. Consider L a subset of S consisting of the lower bounds of A, A is bounded below, so L is not empty, so it has a least upper bound, call it s.
Now we must show s is a greatest lower bound of A. This is where I'm stuck, I don't know how to justify that s is in L.
Assuming this is true, though, can I say that for any x > s, there is some a in A such that a <x and then be done, as s is the glb of A?
>>8987251
The lower bounds of B have no relation to the upper bounds of L in the assumptions. It's easy to find a subset of B not in L that contains the greatest lower bound of B.
The proof is incorrect
>>8987267
My proof or Rudin's, also I forgot to mention that L is bounded above by any element of B
>>8987267
>It's easy to find a subset of B not in L that contains the greatest lower bound of B.
what are you talking about? Greatest lower bound of B is a lower bound of B, therefore it's in L
Since there are so many threads about it. Direct all of your Quantum opinions, arguments, theories, and philosophical bickering in this thread.
Consciousness consists of electrical impulses of quantum energy. “Quantum” means a blossoming of the authentic.
Indeterminists simply hinge their argument on: we don't know because we can't know
and there have been a lot of things we "couldn't" know for most of recorded history
>>8987224
I don't think that's actually what Indeterminists are about. Both have extremes
Extreme determinism for example, borders towards the implication that nihilistic tendencies are acceptable, at least on paper.
Today I did an assessment and only got 22% on it, I feel beyond fucked since I need to get into the higher tier maths so I can get an A, know how to do maths properly at advanced levels so I can go to university.
Please help me out /sci/ what can I say to the tutor to convince him at the interview next week that I can do it? Britfag btw.
>Today I did an assessment and only got 22% on it
wants to take higher level maths.
If you were seeking reassurance here? You will find none.
>>8987096
Why do you think the assessment isn't an accurate evaluation of your results in this program? Unless you have a really good reason, I'd say you're intentionally setting yourself up for failure. There's easier and less catastrophic ways to do that. Challenge a buff guy to an arm wrestling match. Challenge a nerd to a chess match. Ask a hot chick on a date. Seriously. I understand looking into the abyss and wanting to jump in. But don't do that with your education. It's a lot harder to get second chances there.
What fields does one need to learn in order to build and program robots? Compsci? Mech/Elec Engineering? Machine learning?
>>8986853
You got to start building them. When you have a question, find the answer on the internet You will be building experience and learning practical application of devices and structure. Try fail try fail try win capitalize try fail try fail try fail try fail try win capitalize try fail.....ect
>>8986863
Where can i get the materials? What do i need to buy?
>>8986853
I'm going to study robotics in college. Want me to tell you what we'll study in first semester?
Here in the UK we currently have a heatwave. Europe seems to also be having a heatwave (Portugal just had forest fires). And I read today about Arizona in the US, where flights were grounded because the temperature (up to 48 degrees C) was higher than the operating temperature of the aircraft.
Are all of these things due to climate change? And will this stuff keep happening?
It's just another year like all of them. People just suck at remembering what the last year was like.
>>8986811
No it's not, they're saying on British news that we're having the hottest June heatwave for decades.
I'm actually a bit of a climate change sceptic. Well I don't deny it's happening, I've just always taken the view that we should wait and see what happens before destroying entire industries like coal and oil, especially when other countries are still profiting from those industries.
But this heatwave is making me think "hm, maybe global warming is a bit shit".
>>8986848
Hottest heatwave for decades? A decade is in no way relevant amount of time when it comes to measuring climate so it's completely irrelevant. Outlier years will happen. There will be colder summers coming too but they don't fit the agenda so we don't talk about it.
Not destroying the very thing we are trying to protect by fucking over the industries that enable our standard of living is a good thing I agree.