Stereo Pairs a.k.a. 3D porn

File: 1508875779.jpg (68KB, 1022x768px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1022x768px

the smoke looks cool in 3D

>>15404939
HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTT

None of these are proper stereoscopic 3D. They are just images duplicated and placed next to each other. If it's proper stereoscopic 3D, it will look exactly like a 3D image with no distortion, because the images are at slightly different angles that trick your brain into seeing a 3D object. when it's the same image twice, there are distortion areas wherever your eyes aren't focusing on, and it just looks like a weird 2D image like these.

>>15407289
>None of these are proper stereoscopic 3D.

Are you fucking retarded?

Every single image posted is offset for 3D. Open any of them up and overlay them in a graphics processor if you don't believe me.

Or better yet, actually use the 3d viewing technique instead of blind commenting like an idiot.

File: 1277839027748.jpg (241KB, 1000x728px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1000x728px

>>15407289
You're in idiot, try actually checking before you post bullshit.

Got a tutorial or something on how to make these in photoshop?

>>15407526
It's not a graphics processing trick, they really are two separate photographs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereo_camera

It would be a lot of effort to add any worthwhile 3d to a single image. You'd basically have to construct a 3d model of the person and use the image as a texture on the model, then take snapshots using different camera rotations. That's how they convert movies to from 2D to 3D and it's a lot of work.

>>15404939
It actually fucking works, holy shit

>>15407535
Yeah, just wasn't sure if these were all legit 3D images (2 separate pictures) I've done basic stereoscopic (red/blue) with a 2D pic and it came out ok...nothing like these though. Wanted to make some of my wife ;)

>>15407542
If you have a woman willing to pose, you can simulate a 3D camera. Have her stay as still as possible, turn off fans so her hair doesn't move, etc...

Place the camera on a table or something, take the picture, move the camera over 2.5 inches and point it at the exact same spot and take another picture. You should get a stereo pair when done right.

I suspect some of these ones posted used the same technique because the body looks 3D but the hair doesn't which implies there was motion between frames.

File: 1360300093000.jpg (448KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1600x1200px

Like you say I think some are manipulated to look 3D and some are shot 3D.

water looks really neat in these types of pictures.

>>15407540
I thought the same thing when I 1st discovered stereo pairs.

Cum on guys don't let this thread die!

File: qf2MD.gif (2MB, 329x465px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 329x465px

>>15407635
Feel free to post.

File: 1383564447000.jpg (203KB, 1280x689px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1280x689px

>>15407659
Commencing stereogram dump.

File: 1382630393160.jpg (153KB, 1172x924px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1172x924px

dat lighting effect

A year later and the same images still get posted.

>hurr why don't u post one then

I really can't see these, I see four but they're really far apart so I can't make the middle ones combine I see:

/\ /\ /\ /\

>>15408036

This one is great!

File: 1382756988283.jpg (171KB, 1277x960px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1277x960px

>>15408106
Cross your eyes until both sides align in the middle. Then try to relax your eyes and allow yourself to see the 1 image, ignoring the sides. Move closer or further away to find the right distance from the screen.

>>15408117

They never align though, they just stay as four, I've tried it pressed up against my nose and 10 feet away and everything in between.

File: 1395093400166.jpg (141KB, 800x733px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 800x733px

>>15408101
Most of these are some of the same old ones, but I might have a few you haven't seen.

File: 1382766769009.jpg (286KB, 975x725px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 975x725px

>>15408124
Then I'd say it's about controlling your eyes when crossing them. You're crossing them too far if you see 4.

File: 1383293806757.jpg (92KB, 1172x924px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1172x924px

>>15408111
I have a couple more with nice lighting effects.

>>15408130

Fuck, I'm sat looking at these pictures with dick in hand and I ain't see shit.

File: 1382870210071.jpg (146KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1024x768px

>>15408150
Try crossing your eyes slowly, so you can see the images moving together. Then stop when they meet in the middle.

>>15408159

Which image in this thread would you say is easiest?

When you cross your eyes, try to relax them while blinking so that your eyes wont be too crossed.

File: 1383013520288.jpg (363KB, 1210x645px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1210x645px

>>15408162
Maybe >>15408075 because it lines up nicely, without blur, and her tits are amazing.

Here's the original from OP.

>>15408168

I really can't see this shit, I look at the white bar in the middle, cross my eyes and either see a blur, nothing or 4, on odd occasion I do see three I stare at the middle and then I "wake up" focusing on either the left or the right.

Maybe it's because I'm using a tablet.

>>15408175
put your hands up infront of your face to either side of the image. Close your left eye and move your right hand until you can only see the left side of the image, repeat for the other eye/hand. Keep hands where they are, open both eyes. Bam

>>15408162

This one works well for me. >>15407554

>>15408150
>Get your hands off your dick
>Look at screen
>Block right image from right eye with right hand
>Block left image from left eye with left hand

File: 1383205710255.jpg (85KB, 1004x768px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1004x768px

>>15408175
I think I've conditioned my eyes as a child, trying to see those hidden images on posters and kids books. Controlling your eyes when crossing them, and focusing correctly, comes easier with practice.

>>15408188

I can see magic eye shit very easily, just not side by side pictures.

>>15408186

Done this, maybe it's cause I wear glasses.

>>15408200
>glasses

That could be. Do you have contacts? The proximity to the eye may help. I don't use glasses.

>>15408217

Anybody with glasses able to see these?

>>15408220
Also try standing the tablet in front of you and changing distance.

>>15408228

Done that, suppose I'm just thick as shit.

All these images are too far away from each other, have you got any narrow ones?

File: 1395090886548.jpg (83KB, 1239x932px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1239x932px

>>15408258
Maybe this...

>>15408233
Try a large screen at a distance.

File: 1394907763431.jpg (244KB, 1944x1200px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1944x1200px

>>15408262
Oops that was already posted.

File: 1394909676142.jpg (260KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 1920x1200px

I'm taking a break to play GTA. I'll dump the rest of my collection later, and maybe occasionally bump in the mean time.

>>15408261

Nope.

>TFW you've spent half an hour looking for things you can',t see

Something which helped me get these to work:
When you're crossing the images, pick a feature on the two images, and make sure the line between them is perfectly horizontal. If it isn't, tilt your head to make it horizontal.

>>15408220
I have glasses and am able to see them.

>>15408272
If that is who I think it is it doesn't surprise me they got into that.

I find that I have to take each image and switch the left and right images manually (not mirroring) in a graphics program before the 3D effect looks correct cross-eyed. Otherwise it's screwed up. It's like each image has the right image on the left and vice versa.

So is this what the occulus is like

File: nu592h4 - XE.jpg (29KB, 576x288px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 576x288px

Just for the record...

File: s080h4-XE.jpg (73KB, 649x288px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 649x288px

There is absolutely nothing new about this idea

File: s081h4-XE.jpg (53KB, 521x288px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 521x288px

...whatsoever.

>>15408143

that is some weird, fucked up photoshop.

File: 1407778720014.jpg (520KB, 1400x1050px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 1400x1050px

>>15408848
It looks like she's shifted over, in the opposite direction for each image, then the edges poorly filled in.

I personally have not been able to get this right just yet... But I wonder if it's because the images are made for giant squid eyes.

File: 1407779423485.jpg (115KB, 500x396px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 500x396px

This completes my collection. Please uncross your eyes. It's not good to leave them like that.

>>15408159
>3d-eros

figures this is one of the only ones that truly accomplishes the 3d effect in the entire image.

File: michelle_A_276_L_[1].jpg (144KB, 1324x996px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1324x996px

I'll add some

File: betty_C_006_L_[1].jpg (137KB, 1168x924px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1168x924px

>>15408623

>>15409106
Adding to my collection...

File: betty_A_177_L_[1].jpg (111KB, 1172x924px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1172x924px

>>15408036

File: betty_A_207_L_[1].jpg (100KB, 1172x924px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1172x924px

and that's it from Boris

>>15409107
I just want to say someone out here loves all this stuff, its not everyone who can't figure this out, not sure how these people can't but maybe its because I grew up with Magic Eye.

In real life 3D women are awesome but this is almost as good. ;)

>>15409123
I collect them because it's sort of an odd thing... there's only so many of these out there. I happen to be good at viewing these, and I do think Magic Eye has everything to do with that.

>>15408168
This guy knows how to make 'em. No large gradients in either image that isn't there in the other image. That shit confuses the brain, dudes.

BTW you can sort of make these yourself if you have high resolution porn vids.

If the girl is mostly still and the cameraman steps to the side, you can sometimes get two frames where the angle is sufficient to create a stereo pair. I can tell that has happened for at least one of the images in this thread.

Never been able to do this
Probably never will

What helps for me is put your finger between the two images and focus on that. Now slowly move it towards your face, keeping your focus on your finger. You should see two images slide together into a third middle image. At this point even though you were focussed on your finger the images is now crystal clear and in 3d. Quite amazing.

That is fucking amazing. It takes some practice but is is well worth it!

Viewing these correctly is actually a great exercise for your eyes

If you've never done these before, yes, the first few will be very difficult. It takes months to learn how to do it quickly and easily. And for years, I could only do parallel-view ones.

Some people find parallel-view ones harder than cross-eyed but for me it was the opposite. The problem with parallel-view ones is that the left ad right pictures can't be any further apart than your eyes. Cross-eyed don't have that limitation, which is probably why they're more popular.

>>15407659
MOAR GIFS!!

>>15409515
not sure if trolling.

I dunno, fapping while cross-eyed seems...

>>15410257
prevents blindness

These give me a headache

A couple of useful links for stereoscopic porn:

full set of this woman >>15407911
http://imgur . com/a/KrVbf#0

/r/CrossEyedFap

>>15410851
Thanks for the links.

If you have a pair of those old red/cyan 3D glasses, you can view the pics using the KMPlayer

So I can get the three images, and I can see the 3d effect working on the middle one but can't get it in focus? It's just a grainy blur.. Anyone help?

Bump. That was a good use of my morning. A+

I'd love to have some o these printed onto viewmaster cards.

>>15412536
It takes practice. At first when you try to focus on the middle image. Your eyes will tend to drift to either side depending on your dominant eye. But practice and you will get it. Try to find the muscle for focusing and the muscle for going crosseyed and work on it

it's in times like these that i'm glad i have a 3DS.

Amazing thread guys, i'll contribute but you have already posted all the stuff that i have

File: MontereyFirstCityMusicFestival2013_030_a.jpg (6MB, 7232x2714px) Image search: [Google]

6MB, 7232x2714px

>>15409112
I wonder what these guys are using to get their text aligned in dept. I've been using some free software called Stereo 3d Image Maker along with the usual lightroom.

Non-porn, but original content.

>>15409035
All the 3d-eros ones are shit. The camera distance is too high.

This thread contains a mixture of good stereograms, bad stereograms (wrong camera distance), bad 2D to 3D edits, and duplicated images posted by idiots. If you're having trouble viewing one then try another.

>>15407475
OMFG ITS LIKE SHES RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME>>>> WOOOOOOOO EEEEEEEEEE

My eyeballs hurt

>>15408130
you have to focus on seeing 3 images... then focus on the center image... keep trying to push the center image into focus and push the two outer images apart, when you open up the center image its in 3d, and try to stay focused, it feels weird and its hard to adjust but once you've done it for a while you'll get the hang of it

>>15408213
what a mind fuck this one is... she's mostly green or flashes rapidly .... wtf....

>>15412536
keep focusing on the center image and try to keep pushing the other two images out of focus, also if you move farther back from the image your eyes dont have to adjust at a crazy angle

>>15404939
who is the whore

>>15409427
True! I do the same technique. With practice, you just put the finger between you and the screen and can quickly focus on the 3D image.
To the newfags on stereo... don't give up easily, it worth the effort. If is not working at all with some pic, try with a different one.

>>15414799
If its blurred is still not in focus. Concentrate on the middle pic and try to relax your eyes, until the magic happens

>>15414843
Another thing is, look at this on a pc, or even a tablet, but this isn't going to work on your cell phone.

>>15414889
>this isn't going to work on your cell phone
Yes it will, it's easier with smaller images.

>>15408950
Arms reach from a 20" flatscreen works just fine for most of these.

Now, these are awesome, but fapping to it is damn near impossible.