>>26482456 >>26482787 From what I see it's always women making more of a fuss about this and making up statements like "If you don't have sex you're frigid; if you do have sex you're a slut" and taking out this manufactured injustice on men who couldn't care less and want to busy themselves with other things.
Why are artificial women's issues becoming issues for the whole of Western society?
i'm not afraid her pussy is damaged, i'm afraid i'm gonna fucking catch 15 fucking STDs, you blitering faggot, stop acting ignorant. how can you not have STDs if you've had 20 sexual partners? i'm sure they used protection with every single one.
lets face it, if you're a slut, you are a risk to a man. the vagina is like a carriage for disease.
>>26483434 Yes, I understand they're mocking the people who say those things. What I was pointing out is that I've never heard anyone tell someone they're boring for having sex strictly with their partner. False victimization.
>>26483434 They're just incorrect, though. It's mocking a problem that doesn't apply to everyone, and applying it to everyone. Really the only one that seems like it could be widespread is that guys don't want to date sluts. Girls want to be sluts and have their cake too, so they dig up arguments they heard from their friend's sister's aunt's fuckboi about how he said this girl was boring for never having cheated after he told her he's done it, or how he doesn't like inexperienced girls because they don't put out fast enough for his disease-ridden thundercock.
Only one of those complaints is based in reality and it's a valid reason not to date someone.
>>26483717 The conclusions of these ancient beliefs and studies shows possible sources of male michrochimerism that are known from pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twin, or sexual intercourse. This science proves that through intercourse alone women can obtain the male genes and DNA within their organs and blood for their entire life. The act of sex is a divine gift between a man and a women for the purpose of human reproduction. It is a sacred covenant, and holy sacrament between a husband and wife. This sacred spiritual act of the union of souls should always be regarded as such.
Semen secrets: How a previous sexual partner can influence another male's offspring Date: October 1, 2014 Source: University of New South Wales Summary: Scientists have discovered a new form of non-genetic inheritance, showing for the first time that offspring can resemble a mother's previous sexual partner -- in flies at least. Researchers manipulated the size of male flies and studied their offspring. They found that the size of the young was determined by the size of the first male the mother mated with, rather than the second male that sired the offspring.
>>26483717 Human biology. We're capable of becoming addicted to, and develop tolerances to virtually anything we do when it's not in moderation. It becomes less of an expression of caring about someone/trust and more of "that next fix" when the frequency of sex and number of sexual partners increases. When that happens, the partner becomes replaceable and relationships are completely pointless. If you want to be a slut, go ahead, but don't expect someone to connect with you the way you want; you're incapable of connecting with them like that once you become addict and you can never fix that.
no of course not. but the microbial microflora of a cunt (or dick for that matter albeit to a lesser extent) is altered by sex. there's nothing necessarily wrong with this, in fact it could well be that hers was less healthy beforehand, but there's still something a little unsettling about knowing that you're sticking your dick in something which was growing on a dude's dick, and while as i say it could be conducive to good health, the opposite could also be true and the bodily microflora is so woefully under-researched and little understood atm, that who knows what little pathogens we might be picking up and what they might be doing to us long-term.
tl;dr no, and my concerns are little more than paranoia, but still, dick bacteria.
>>26485612 but if you get with a virgin, she's yet to go through the near-inevitable slut phase, and as such you either end up cucked or alone. former sluts make good partners, they've grown out of it. i won't date anyone aged under 28, 30-35 is my preference, and i'd prefer her to have been a total whore at some point, and now just wanna chill and settle.
Girls are just born with roasties right? Like when their dads change their diapers they puff their pipe, put some smoke in the air and say "honey, our little princess is a scrumptious little Arby's menu item isn't she?"
>>26482456 not only does it damage the vagina, it also ruins what little character girls have to begin with. If you don't know this, you need to stop watching Disney movies and hang out with Chads they'll tell you the same
a dr natasha campbell mcbride has even written abou this. the babby's intestine, previously sterile, is first populated by the vagina at the time of birth. those micro-organisms's offspring (2 trillion by the time you're an adult) are still alive inside you today, and some of them will be from your mother's former partners
>>26483944 Im going to take this opportunity to warn everyone that Vice is going to become a lot more annoying than they already are. There new TV channel launches soon and it is nothing but the most infuriating SJW bullshit you'll ever see. Elen Pages show is particularly bad. Its really bad and norrmies are going to call you sexist and homophobic for criticizing its bullshit.
>>26485925 I can tell you that the entire environment around the company is dead set on appeasing the SJW crowd. everyone is fucking terrified to say anything that might be remotely offensive. at the same time all they approve is content that is ether saying white people are evil or men are evil. The only note bout anything is "this needs more women" "why cant a women be the host of this show about video games, that's offensive to women" is all about women's issues being shoehorned into every single piece of content
>>26485969 i'm talking about having a relationship, not just getting laid. and christ, i lost my virginity 20 years ago, losing your virginity is something entirely different. the only time i think sex is indeed worth pursuing outside of a relationship. a hurdle which will fuck with your head until you just get that dopey shit outta the way so you can concentrate on more important things. i'd have happily lost my v-card to just about any human female.
I could easily lose mine right now to a slut or a girl i'm not that interested in. But I keep waiting for the perfect girl, and it doesn't seem like that is going to happen. Should I just get this shit over with so I can focus on my life? I can't even sleep at night without worrying.
>>26486099 >Should I just get this shit over with so I can focus on my life? yes. of course. jesus, why even ask? adultwork.com wear a condom "incall" or hotel only just get that shit over and done with.
it doesn't matter if it's physically damaged or not, the issue is that it's metaphorically damaged. If a man or woman has given their body to tons and tons of people, it shows how little they care for their body, and their intimate relationships with others. I wouldn't marry a man who bragged about how many girls/guys he fucked, and I'd hope no one would marry me if I fucked a ton of guys/girls
>>26486302 Plus its a sign of commitment issues which means they're just damaged on something that isn't physical. they're dysfunctional degenerates and thats fine. But people need to stop pushing slut acceptance on people with standards. If you want to be a slut, be a slut and leave the ones who are looking for someone to commit to alone.
>>26486394 If you hate the push for slut acceptance shit as a straight dude, you'd just love to see the shit gay guys see. Promiscuity in the gay community is so fucking rampant and no one ever seems to have an issue with it, it's so awful to try to find someone that'll be committed to you as much as you'll be committed to them that hasn't also fucked or been fucked by 20 other dudes.
I mean yeah, it'd probably be really easy to lose your virginity, but why would you want to just throw that away when you could build a relationship with someone, fall in love, and then lose your virginities to each other?
Maybe I'm just too much of a hopeless romantic, or whatever that term is
>>26486179 Thing is, that's a bad analogy. People would be a little more careful about buying that box of Cheerios if they knew there was a chance it was actually a deliberately mislabelled box of Bran and Spiders (with raisins).
>>26486690 >Maybe I'm just too much of a hopeless romantic, or whatever that term is Don't change who you are or what you believe or the mindset that you find cancerous will win. I don't know first hand how it feels, but I work with gay guys and they're the most whorish guys I've ever worked with. Every week they've got a "i fucked this guy" story and as a straight dude I find it uncomfortable on many levels. I'd stand with you for Sexual Decency, this slut shit is disgusting and no one wants to consider the long term affect.
>>26487090 oh so she was massaging guys wither her hands, breasts, mouth and then swallowing but you're ok with it. And of course you don't mind she is "massaging" your friends or neighbors from time to time. You're so progressive anon.
Marriage and family related materials. Links http://www.medicaldaily.com/ignorance-bliss-when-it-comes-marriage-fewer-partners-youve-had-more-likely-your-298752 http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2012/08/more-promiscuity-data.html
>>26487540 well it happened to me. i used to fuck every remotely attractive chick who'd let me within half a mile of her. since falling in love i rarely bother at all. 'she' changed everything, casual sex is now so shit i almost never even cum. so unlikely or not, i know it's possible, and i believe her. she even told me that one day a dude (her step brother, random point of potential interest) tried to fuck her, so she slapped him. so too would i have had he not been a royal marine who'd have fucking snapped me in half with one hand.
i believe the things she told me, and all these years later we still talk, we're totally honest with each other about everything, i've still no reason to believe that she ever ever lied.
>>26487685 See >>26487367 the effect is less pronounced for men. >i believe the things she told me, and all these years later we still talk, we're totally honest with each other about everything, i've still no reason to believe that she ever ever lied. She may not be cheating but she's still a high risk person, and people like her are at a high risk for cheating, how long have you been together?
if by "goldilocks pussy" you mean a vagina which is attached to a girl with whom you share your life, fall in love with and want to grow old with regardless of what her porking portions happen to look like, then i agree with you on that one too.
>>26487809 we're not together, this was ages ago, i was only like 19 and we only spent about 9 months together. she'd had her mother die, was gang raped while on holiday trying to get over her mother's death then her dad began abusing her. she was VERY fucking unhappy, and given that i was the only person on earth who treated her nicely, i'm pretty sure she was so relieved, that she was honest with me no matter what.
i feel like such a moron for breaking up with her. i was young and scared. scared by her two fucking royal marine brothers, one of whom kept threatening to murder me because he wanted to fuck her, but she wouldn't let him. i was too much of a wuss and he could have snapped me in half with one hand.
>>26485660 >they've grown out of it No they haven't, they're at a much higher risk for both divorce and cheating. >>26487918 >we only spent about 9 months together That relationship is like the blink of an eye anon, it's not very useful. >he'd had her mother die, was gang raped while on holiday trying to get over her mother's death then her dad began abusing her >one of whom kept threatening to murder me because he wanted to fuck her That's quite the horror story.
I've lived with some pretty trashy people who are basically pro-cheating (white trash are the worst m8) and I've never heard that "women who don't cheat are boring." Who the fuck says that? Is it actually something women tell each other or is VICE just making shit up again? (I suspect the latter)
>>26485660 >but if you get with a virgin, she's yet to go through the near-inevitable slut phase,
if a girl gets to her mid-twenties and hasn't gone through "the slut phase" maybe she isn't going to go through it.
And you know what, even if your extremely hypothetical scenario were true, a girl who hasn't gone through her "slut phase" will always be of a higher value than a girl coming out of her "slut phase," by pure virtue that she isn't a slut yet.
>>26487987 >>they've grown out of it >No they haven' i've seen it happen a dozen times. my own personal experience, especially of shy girls, is that they find a guy, fall in love, it goes to hell for whatever reason, and they go batshit insane, become lesbians, become feminists, fuck everything that moves, then in their desperate, apparent attempt to find something which they're not quite sure what it is, stop fucking everything which moves, and settle down. i can only talk from personal experience and i'm sure this isn't true for every girl, but i've seen it so many times that i err on the side of caution. it's definitely true in my experience that girls over 30 have given up being the sluts they once were. they just... chill and settle. i'm lucky i suppose that unlike apparently every other man alive, i find girls aged around 30 more attractive than 18-23yo's everyone else seems to want.
> stop fucking everything which moves, and settle down Have you followed them for 10 years past marriage? I'm telling you the stats are bad for this group on both divorce and cheating, just because they seem more calm doesn't mean they'll be faithful wives or have long marriages.
>>26488117 >it's definitely true in my experience that girls over 30 have given up being the sluts they once were. Good for them.
But I don't want ANYTHING to fucking do with those "ex-sluts." Based on their past, they've demonstrated that they are not good girlfriend material, they are not good wife material, they are not good mother material, and all I have to rely on is her past. I can't take it on faith that she's turned a new leaf, no more than I can believe in a horoscope.
>i find girls aged around 30 more attractive than 18-23yo's everyone else seems to want. I literally laughed out loud at this. You really need to tone it down if you want people to believe you.
>>26488188 lol, oh wow anon, you're so angry. am i right in assuming that you'd like to get laid more often than you do?
>Have you followed them for 10 years past marriage? yeah some of them, i'm still in contact with the majority of the girls i've dated, i still email/talk on the phone with female friends i've known for over 3 decades. i have way more female friends than males, and given that i don't do the whole angry/macho male thing, girls talk to me about all kinds of stuff which instinct tells me they wouldn't tell most guys. do you present these articles and images to prospective partners? do you own a polygraph machine?
>>26488279 >I literally laughed out loud at this. You really need to tone it down if you want people to believe you. well i'm 37. i used to like the 18yo physically perfect thing same as seemingly all other guys, but once i'd fallen in love just one time, i realised how utterly trivial physical appearance is when compared with a legitimately close, loving, emotional connection. if my ex, who i still love, lost her tits and vagina in a tragic train explosion, i love her so much that i'd still be with her for life, and happily never get laid again. you think 90yo's who've been together for decades still fuck? i want a partner, not just a fuck.
pic is my celeb crush, she's 35, and imo hotter than every 18yo on earth
>>26488287 >lol, oh wow anon, you're so angry I'm not angry at all? >yeah some of them, i'm still in contact with the majority of the girls i've dated, i still email/talk on the phone with female friends i've known It's just too small of a group, the trends still hold, personal anecdotes don't trump general trends. >do you own a polygraph machine? No, but polygraphs are bullshit anyway.
>>26488427 >you think 90yo's who've been together for decades still fuck? i want a partner, not just a fuck. That's why it's important not to get with someone who's not likely to leave you, which is what an ex-slut is.
>>26488492 >when you too have fallen in love >you WILL fall in love Unlikely, where do you think you are? >>26488511 That's fine you're nice to talk to anyway, also I mistakenly used a double negative in that sentence. Keep on keeping on.
>acquaintance of mine fucks a virgin >"God, she was so boring, just lay there crying about how it hurt. She wasn't fun at all and couldn't even suck dick." >goes on to fuck 3 more virgins, complains about every single one of them
That fucking cunt. Why do normies feel the need to spoil virgins when they hate it so much?
>>26488549 >Unlikely, where do you think you are? lol, indeed. i think a lot of rowboats could probably score tonight if they'd stop believing the stuff which gets posted here. good luck anon, hope you find her. love is great.
>>26488427 >you think 90yo's who've been together for decades still fuck? I think that 90 year old woman probably wasn't getting spit-roasted in her teenage years.
>pic is my celeb crush usually I don't make fun of people for their sexual preferences, but it looks like your crush is a huge fucking slut. Like everything about her from the dyed hair to the "little sister" kanji wrist tattoo screams that she's had multiple abortions in her past.
>>26483321 to her other slut friends its not the guys shaming them for their virtue its the jealous slut friends who see them as some sort of enemy since they didnt buy tickets for the cock carousel. if they see their friend is happy with one guy and they cant even keep a guy after a week they start to shame their friend.
>>26488677 yet now she's in love with this lucky son of a bitch and has 2 kids https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnT7e6SqUrE you can tell just by the way she looks at him that she loves him. i bet she'll never cheat regardless of how much of a slut shes been in the past. lucky bastard, that gianni.
>>26488668 >go to bars almost every day to get piss drunk and talk to old depressed blue collar workers about everything >a lot of student girls because near university >normalshit chads come up to them and after ten minutes they all get out >tried to do the same >got burned hard >thought i was too drunk and tried while sober >got burned even harder >still khv
I am almost certain you are a woman. You're also almost certainly a liberal, given that you appear to be amygdala-deficient and prone to emotional reasoning.
Congratulations, you really destroyed him with your "but muh love" argument. You know what you really should take away from love (Something I have, previously, experienced)? That despite knowing the actual statistics and understanding biological and psychological tendencies towards infidelity etc. with women who have higher partner counts, your brain can betray you by flooding your systems with oxytocin. That's what you should take from it. Not "Well, you might feel different eventually, so numbers are pointless lol!" but rather "Remember that your brain is not your friend, do not fall for tricks designed to increase your mating chances with a variety of women, be strong."
>>26482456 Literally nobody in the world has ever called someone boring for only sleeping with one person she's in a relationship with. No one has ever actually called someone 'frigid' or a 'prude' for sleeping with nobody. It's literally only sluts who have the bad name and for good reason.
>>26488761 >BTFO seriously? love isn't a mathematical equation, angry anon. and yeah i'm "a liberal", but i'm not discussing politics on /r9k/, i get the impression it'd be worse than /pol/ i get laid if i want to, i've been in love and had an incredible, life-changing experience having done so, and i'm a very happy person. i feel distinctly un'BTFO'd brah, and i'm not posting dick pics, so stop trying to socially engineer me, i am in fact a dude. >>26488775 imma take a gamble and guess that you're a single "realist", lol >>26488853 >People don't change unless they see consequences for their actions. Real, lasting consequences that make them fully understand just how badly they fucked up. i don't deny this
In name only, my effeminate liberal friend. You think like a woman and it's apparent in your posting. You appear to be unable to stop shitting out ad hominems based on relationship status (for the record, I have a gf, feel free to REEEEE at me frogposters). You don't care about facts but only feelings, which apparently mean that reality is completely irrelevant if you, just, like, feel like it, maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnn. You're deluded.
>>26488915 well i don't wanna ignore people who addressed me personally, and why multiple-post, thereby making this rather amusing thread 404 faster than is necessary?
ah man, i've only been on r9k a few days, but it's funny as fuck here. you poor bastards. no disrespect, not trying to sound condescending, i legit feel for you, but this thread is hilarious. >>26488984 >Do it. seriously? you're that convinced that it's impossible that i'm male? holy shit. i didn't think anyone would take me up on that. not sure i can be bothered. but... alright. i might. gimme a while though, i'm eating dinner. >>26489052 >irrelevant my relationships appear to be the polar opposite of what you assert they're near-inevitably going to be, anon. even if the stuff you've posted is accurate, it's simply not my experience. maybe it's not the girls who are causing this... self-fulfilling prophecy, hm?
>>26489106 >seriously? you're that convinced that it's impossible that i'm male? No I actually totally believe you, I just would like to see you. >my relationships appear to be the polar opposite of what you assert Unless you've been in multiple 10 year relationships without cheating, they're not the polar opposite. These are risks assessed over a long time not short term relationships. >maybe it's not the girls who are causing this... self-fulfilling prophecy, hm? That's a silly way to look at the stats, the simpler answer is that since most divorces are initiated by women that these women get bored with their single life and cut and run (or just cheat).
>>26489106 >my relationships appear to be the polar opposite of what you assert they're near-inevitably going to be, anon. even if the stuff you've posted is accurate, it's simply not my experience. maybe it's not the girls who are causing this... self-fulfilling prophecy, hm?
I'm not saying it's near inevitable. Maybe someone else did, that wasn't me though. The point is simply that on average, in most cases, you would be wise to seek out a certain type of relationship. I'm not even going to say that there are no reformed sluts, but the majority of my personal experience contradicts yours. From what I have seen (I'm only in my late 20s though) most former whores remain whores, even into their forties, and often have failed marriages. The data at hand all suggests that my experience is valid, so I trust it.
From what I have seen, and from what the available data says (requesting the "90% of cheaters get away with it" article if anyone has it on hand), most cheaters aren't caught. It's entirely possible that your experience isn't what you think it's been. So maybe your relationships haven't gone to shit, but they may have involved infidelity regardless. There are many possibilities. And if you'd like to avoid those possibilities to the best of your ability, then the correct course of action is to not data whores.
tl;dr I'm not saying it's set in stone, but there are some very, very strong correlations displayed
>>26486760 >Vaginal rejuvenation surgery Wait a second, that's a thing ? Well, nice, now they can keep lying as much as they want. They can just get some betabux to pay it for them, an there you go, "new" vag for the price of a plastic surgery. Just fuck this world, I wasn't born for it.
>>26489052 >when it comes to love you only care about feelings this is true. i know i'm not quoting you but i think i can respond to what you were trying to convey by reminding you that it's near-enough impossible to even define love, let alone predict, dissect or understand it.
goatee timestamp for those insisting that i'm a girl
thread is getting a little exhausting, imma grab some popcorn and simply observe for a while i think. but i will say before i lurk, that as someone who has only recently re-discovered r9k and had forgotten how damaged many of you poor bastards are, i'd strongly urge anyone who wants to get into a lasting relationship, to please god, not pay too much attention to threads like this. if you wanna fall in love, treating it like a mathematical equation is a surefire way to end up alone.
just my two penneth. happy valentines day all, and don't give up lonely rowboats. i think if you can drop the rage, you'll find her.
Alright m8, but consider that regardless of a concept being difficult to define, sometimes you should pay attention to the observable reality on the ground. And that reality is that not only will most robots fail to find love, but statistically many of those who do will end up being fucked over. So ignoring potential warning signs is taking pointless risks that will quite possibly result in heartbreak. Too often, people find someone they like and ignore everything bad about them because "oh fuck I'm finally getting laid." My entire point was that you shouldn't do that, not that you should never trust anyone ever.
>>26486179 Everyone can care about anything they want, there arent rules about tastes and preferences. If I only dated 6"10 shemales of color and thought the rest of women are discusting, as long as I dont go down the street giving shit to random woman, who fucking cares?
During a period of several months, I was regularly fucking a woman that could be accurately characterized as a "club whore." She told me, that by age 23, she had slept with 150+ guys.
It didn't really matter to me. If anything, it was simply a red flag that she had insecurities and validation problems (guess what, she did).
It also felt good that she kept coming back to me for sex. I took that as a compliment.
What's funny, though, is that she was TERRIBLE at sex. That's how it goes with women who've slept with a lot of guys, but haven't had long-term relationships. Nobody's really taken the time to tell them what guys like... they just do vanilla, traditional "sex stuff."
>>26493430 >can confirm that this is horseshit guess we must have, like, yaknow, not dated the same girls, had the same experiences or been the same people, crazy i know, but it's the only logical explanation
>>26493714 i'm saying that it isn't true of my experiences, what else can i do but trust what i've personally experienced time and time again? >>26493756 >averages i've no way of knowing whether i've just been lucky or not, but i can't deny what's happened to me just because of a graph or two. every living person is immeasurably different from every other living person. just gotta do what appears to work for me, i think it'd be pretty dumb to do anything else.
>>26483228 maybe you meant to type marriage at 18, not 30? not happening man. girls enjoy sex and are offered it a billion times a day. of course while single they're going to accept it from time to time. so too would you.
>>26482456 >She refuses to give her boyfriend a number. "He's certain that my pussy is damaged by the amount of guys I've had sex with. He has this stupid belief he can't let go, that the bigger the number of guys a woman sleeps with, the larger her pussy," she says. "My boyfriend isn't an asshole, he hates thinking like this, but it's somehow stronger than him."
>>26488854 >only slut women shit on women virginal women
gee i wonder why would a stupid ass whench that sleeped around with more than 3 men and nobody likes for more than one night would be mad at a good girl that saves herself for someone, and everyone loves her and see her like the perfect woman to live forver with
>>26483330 Alright look. Semi normie here, wannabe normie whatever you want to call me.
It's precisely because I spent a chunk of my youth fucking femanons from here that I realise the immense psychological damage promiscuity does to a woman's mind, her self esteem, her ability to feel positive and happy.
I've seen things robots wouldn't believe. Femanons who claimed to be able to separate sex and love break down completely after sex and start crying, camwhores with self harm scars as long as their forearms. All of these things are a tragedy. But women keep on buying into this narrative that the men close to them want to stop them fucking around out of spite.
>>26494867 yeah it seems so. but aside from not getting laid, i used to be very much like you lot. terrible social anxiety and misplaced rage issues. i've only been here a few days because i'm sulking about the whole valentines day thing, given that 'she' fucked off 4 years ago and i'm still not close to over it. nor i suspect shall i ever be. reading this board is like therapy for me. i really am not the most pathetic person alive. and i say this as someone who's sat here alone, posting on an imageboard aged 37, smoking heroin and sulking about a girl who left almost half a decade ago. you lot really are pros. and yeah i probably will fuck off now that valentines day is over. inbetween the soul-crushing, dragging, interminable oceans of self-pity and depression you all relentlessly spout however, i'm finding this board surprisingly amusing, wasn't expecting that, so you might have to put up with me for a day or two longer, sorry. and on that note, 1.45am, going to sleep. thanks for helping me through that /r9k/, you beautiful, pathetic bastards you.
>>26488336 >by contrast, a man's sexual history has no affect on the relationship at all I wonder, then, if its just the men who get pissed and instigate the divorce? Any statics that show why these relationships end the way they do?
>>26495202 >Read the SEQUAL Come on son, no references just one guys general insight. What was the point of this? My article doesn't restrict cheating to one gender, references other material, and was written by someone who can spell.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.