Just a reminder to you "fembots."
You will always be inferior to men. Men are better at everything than you. Every piece of work we excel at. We beat you in everything. You are inferior to us in every way. Even that autistic neck beard virgin is more intelligent and valuable than you because the work he is capable to do.
Stay fuck dolls for men's pleasures.
- Signed R9K
The belief that women are of more value is false. Men are capable of more, can do more work and contribute more to the world far more than any woman can. A grown man is the most valuable and mightiest creation on this planet. Women again are just fuck dolls made for men's pleasure, their value is given to them by men. Our glory is given to us by nature, hence we are crowned above all creation and rule over women and the animals.
While women are intrinsically worthless, they'll live a better quality of life compared to the average men. We're doomed to suffer all our lives while they're comforted with strangers to their disposal.
Actually, I like it the way it is. We all can tell when an actual woman posts here. Trolls just can't fucking help but tip their hand to piss us off.
So, the actual result is ALL "femanon here" posts get derided as trolls.
Well yeah but without women you can't reproduce
If you have 20 women and 10 men you can populate the next generation much quicker than if you have 10 women and 20 men, plus if there are more men than women you have unrest because some of the men won't have mates
Women are the more valuable sex
Yes the virgin neckbeard is more valuable than a 250k woman who sucked another dicks and flirted with enough of her bosses to get to her position. He can do better work than any business woman can, if he was in the position of a business woman he would do a better job than a female. The only reason "business women" exist is because to make the company look good and to fulfill gender quotas in employment which if a company does not willingly hire enough women then the courts will force them too.
>He doesn't know about the Founder effect.
>He doesn't know women's reproductive abilities are severely hurt by age when a man's is far less so.
If you like a group of inbred retards, go right on ahead believing this.
Doesn't matter how quick someone can reproduce, we have enough people in this world. And all that matters is your evolution delusions is that the species survives. Men carry living sperm, women have a dead egg and a vessel for our seed to grow in. Men do not lay on their asses for 9 months, men build infrastructure, feed the world and bring justice to it. Men are thus more valuable. But nice "muh vagina" argument lmao.
Yes it's called the Equal Employment Opportunity Act that was passed by congress. Courts haven't had to force minority and gender quotas for 20 years now though because all companies usually comply.
I already said that men are obviously capable of more physically and mentally, but from a biologic stand point women are the more valuable sex purely because of reproduction, this is why throughout history cultures have men doing the dangerous work and put focus on protecting females
>They're protected because of a single biological quirk.
>That makes them more valuable!
I see you have a vagina and can't actually calculate value.
All you've done is prove that one dick is capable of making as many kids as dozens of vaginas.
Just because you require protection does not make you more valuable. It's done out of pity and requirements, not because of some inherent value.
>women can be bred to raise a small village if valued
>"b-b-but I can write shitty books!"
O V E R C O M P E N S A T I O N
-females are not males
-men want to be validated, to feel relevant, meritorious, worthy
-when men feel disconnected from reality, they think of suicide
-men understand that other men are just as pathetic as them
-therefore men cannot be validated by other men, but by something that is not male
-men want therefore to be validated by
--higher men who do not feel the need to be validated
-higher men are rare
-women are not rare
-how to be validated, to be noticed by cumdumpsters?
-women are hedonistic, which means they are egotistic and what feeds their ego is their pleasures.
-therefore, to be noticed by women, men love to try to please women
-how to please tramps?
-women love sex and money
-women love to love sex and money
-- therefore men give them money and sex FOR FREE
-men understand then that other men give money and sex to the same woman.
-men understand that women LOVE to have plenty of lovers
-men understand that women DESPISE poor &/orugly men SINCE those men cannot feed her hedonism
-most men remain unvalidated, unnoticed and whine >no gf
-women compete with other to get the best men
-most women always get what they want from men, even a solid decade after their menopause. EACH girl KNOWS that, in her life, there will ALWAYS be one man more dedicated to her than to any other girl.
-women want sex, as said, but equally to be entertained outside the bedroom (which cost money)
-the goal of the girl is to get the best man who will focus on her for a very long time
-no such man exists, so she will seek men who satisfy her through sex and other men who satisfy her through comfort
-men being worms, they build various strategies to provide for women
-men being worms, they attempt to avoid passing for worms in saying ''women are sluts and useless''
the fact is that women are far smarter than worms, and worms despises this. worms will say that any other woman which is not their /true one/wife/gf/oneitis is a whore (as if it is an insult HAHAHA)
>Less women more unrest
>Implying every person has one girlfriend like a good goy in a tribe
Women will cause more unrest if there are twice as much.
Also you pretty much proved womens only value is existing well done.
One dick is capable of making as many kids as there are vaginas available to fuck you gigantic retard, hence why women were a valuable resource throughout history and were protected as such
The 10 women would be pregnant with 10 of the mens children, hence the other 10 men wouldn't have any way of reproducing at least until they have birthed said children
And I never implied that women do have any worth other than just being a reproductive tool
Again, just because there's a biological quirk does not make them a valuable resource.
Here's the part you're forgetting...
They're only useful to breed for 10-15 years, then you start getting a worsening product. It's not the women themselves that are valuable, but the children.
And if they're so valuable... why do they always feel so worthless?
Men are disposable.
The work that they do is the work of slaves.
I hate women but you're not even trolling that femanon. History has sent millions of men to die in war, leaving the women behind to get impregnated. Which is more expendable, truly? The 10-men-1-woman island scenario is infinitely more disastrous than the 1-man-10-women scenario. Don't conflate scarcity with value.
Yes you pretty much did. Better luck next time.
What's with the word politics? Do you like the world "valuable" too much to be able to stand seeing it used to describe women?
Valuable means "a thing that is of great worth"
And worth just means something that is important
How is reproduction not important? It's literally the most important thing in the context of biology
>15 years populating the earth
>0 years populating the earth
Sounds like you are jelly of the female's inherent value so you try to overcompensate by "muh creativity and mind and shit". If this were any other society you would've died in war with thousands of other disposable "intellectuals".
Because by itself it's just that. Getting fucked over. Without men it'd be pointless because she would have died anyway.
Without women there are no children.
Without men there is NOTHING.
>find a way
For how long?
Oh yeah, in this exact amount of time.
Science has actually made it possible to raise a viable test tube fetus using female tissue exclusively. Men likely invented the technology, but without women the inventor would get to enjoy it for 100 years max.
>take away women
>descend into chaos, even if a way is found (which is highly unlikely), babies grow up to be psychotic because men are too busy waging wars and jerking off to porn to raise them
>everyone ends up killing each other
>take away men
>bunch of sperm banks have enough semen to repopulate the earth
>infrastructure in place to continue living on just as before
Without men like you there is less cattle to enslave to ensure the checkout line at Wal-Mart runs more smoothly. Bet your mother is proud.
>I'm not good at anything so I'll claim all the accomplishments of this huge group of people that I happen, through no accomplishment of my own, to belong to
Sperm banks have already been invented. Retroactively take away males? Human race extinct. Retroactively take away females? Human race extinct. Why are you even continuing this thread?
>Sperm banks are automatic.
Women can barely run an already successful company after men have built it and handed it over on a silver platter.
Men have built civilization IN SPITE of women, not because of them.
>mad that he has no value
>mad that other women are born with inherent value
>has to claim the accomplishments of greater men
>men are born with inherent ability
>has to argue MUH VAGINA
>is part of the lesser group so wants to claim, "b-b-but you're claiming group s-stuff!"
>can't actually come up with something useful women have done besides shit out kids
When you add up the total value of a man and woman, men come out on top. The ONLY way you can get to a point where women are more valuable is in some sort of apocalypse hypothesis that'll never happen.
Because men won't let it happen despite women trying to drag them down.
Stay worthless. We'll drag you through civilization, kicking and screaming.
>Didn't address that women aren't actually capable of running those institutions or performing that science.
As I said already, can't even run an already successful company. And now I've pointed out the only way this argument is even useful is in a very specific scenario that will never happen.
Inherent ability to do what exactly?
You weren't born with shit, that's why you're so salty. Must suck having to wagekek for the rest of your lonely life while Chad lives it up. Should've asked your mommy to allocate you some better genes.
The science has already been done. Unless you think a complete breakdown of all human medical knowledge is possible at this point - and in that case, sure buddy. We're arguing inherent value, since you already acknowledged the historical fact that men were throwaway tools.
>You weren't born with shit...
Just higher muscle mass, bigger brain, higher IQ, and the ability to father children into my 60s and later while women lose the ability between 25-35. Yeah, I'm born with plenty. Stay jealous.
>The science is already done!
>Remove all men, the majority of doctors and scientists... but there isn't a breakdown of medical knowledge.
Except there is a breakdown of medical knowledge. Only very exceptional women become doctors. Bright men can.
>b-b-but you-you're a throwaway!
>m-muh inherient value
Oh? You're afraid to argue actualized value as well? I can see why. You'd easily lose then. By an even larger margin.
>Situations that will never happen.
So you're admitting that women are less useful and have less value.
>Explain this part!
Did you not read my post? Is it too hard for you? I did RIGHT after. But go on, answer with knee-jerk reactions and just blinding stumble your way to the reply instead of reading all the way through.
>That's just hyperbole!
>Posts a hyperbole.
You mean publicly mourned about. Not the same thing as, "Matters."
Why are women so stupid? No facts or anything to back up their reasoning. We RULE OVER YOU, WE RULE OVER THE ANIMALS AND YOU WOMEN. We are the best and most intelligent creation on planet Earth. WOMEN ARE OUR SERVANTS. THEY OBSESS OVER THEIR LOOKS BECAUSE MEN GIVE THEM VALUE. WOMEN ARE NOTHING WITHOUT MEN, WOMEN ARE TOYS FOR MEN GIVEN BY NATURE.
You mean white men failed. Everywhere else their women are in submission, kept at home as servants and personal possessions for man's pleasure.
>It wasn't because if I didn't perform explicit mental gymnastics to refuse it I'd lose.
At the end of the day we rule over you. Men do not need female validation, fuckdoll. Last time I checked you women wear short skirts, make up, etc to get validation from men. You spend your whole life doing this. Because you are just that, a fuck doll created for men. Men do not need women, but without men women couldn't survive. You are a parasite to men, you do not build, you do not contribute all you are is nature's fuck doll given to us as toys. Womankind is dependent on mankind, we do not need you however.
You need us to fuckdoll. But a man alone doesn't need a woman in today's world. We need to use women to continue our species exist, yes, and that takes two. But again you are just a vessel. Our sperm is alive and living, you are simply a vessel for it to grow in. You are the cow manure for our seed. I'm sure in the future we will be able to extract female genes from our own male bodies(since we have half from our mothers) and create artificial wombs and vessels. That or unlock immortality.
But again outside "muh vagina" you are useless. You withholding your vagina stings a little yes, like depriving a child candy that he delights in, but he can do without it fuck doll. Know your place bitch. We rule over you.
Wow word play so clever.
Women don't need men to survive either. It's just with so many losers trying so hard stacies would have to be retarded to not take the free goods, seeing as now there's no social penalty for riding the cock carousel.
>calling an oldfag a newfag
>yfw you should have just said, "Lurk moar."
>Women don't need men to survive either
kek. The fuck doll has resorted to denial. You do not have the strength to build infrastructure, to hunt game. LMFAO.
I believe this has already be refuted fuckdoll, this experiment showed how worthless you are: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqfAt7TshLw
Remember, it's a man's world, women just live in it.
The house over your head, the computer screen and the keyboard you are using were a man's invention and created by men. The tall buildings and cars you hear outside were created by men fuck doll. The men who built these things also had fuck doll toys at home who knew their place and were submissive while the big strong man did all the work. They knew their place, how come you don't know yours?
stay mad you ugly roastie. Women completely BTFO in this thread. Every argument of theirs was teared down with logic and sound reasoning.
Stay delusional roasties. Chads who get the most female validation are the greatest men in history from generals to president. Ugly males are usually losers and depressed like the people on r9k. You are speaking nonsense, we are biologically and mentally superior. We do not have the female fuck doll mind. Nature did not create our gender as a toy for the other gender like women but we were created to rule over all the animals and you women. The most superior creation on this planet is us men. A lion is more value than you because you women are fools and are useless like children.
>It's more than MEN can't.
>If the roles were reversed and women actually wanted men YOU would be the one sitting on your ass and enjoying female validation.
Either this is a contradiction for an argument or saying, "roles reversed," in the first place is a non-argument. So which is it?
>if women actually wanted men
Sometimes they do, the man is called Chad and he runs multiple businesses as a millionaire CEO world changer who can literally cure AIDS if he wasn't busy plowing his infinite stock of living sex toys
If they were reversed it'd be what I predicted. But men are too sexually driven for that to ever happen.
That's my point.
Do you have any clue how crazy you sound? Nature didn't "create" either gender with a role.
>Do you have any clue how crazy you sound? Nature didn't "create" either gender with a role.
Yes it did roastie. Why do you think women have inferior biological strength. I'm done, women are just too stupid and childish to debate. It is like debating a fool or a child, you are going around and around in circles.
They are derived from physical traits. The roles would only be reversed if men had wombs.
If the roles were reversed, the roles would have to be reversed in more than just some "social" aspect.
Nature isn't sentient. It just propagated what worked.
Assuming a vacuum where it worked that way. I've made a point earlier about wombs being more valuable since its directly tied into the next generation's population.
A vacuum could only exist within a male choice system, because in these gender dimorphism is very reduced or barely-developed.
Gender dimorphism is a clear indicator of a female choice system (males compete over females) and leads to a physiological and behavioral difference between the two genders. This obviously is the case in humans, like it or not.
The resilience of a population is heavily dependent on wombs, not sperm. This is why women aren't sent into combat. A society that loses 40%-50% of its males, but with the female population mostly intact can recover very quickly. This obviously wouldn't be true in the reverse scenario.
Wombs being valuable is simple fact of nature.
Depends on your values, I guess.
I find female reproduction strategies revolting and cynical. Especially extended sexuality, which heavily revolves around cucking betas.
But I guess you can't blame people for instinctive behavior.
Even in WWII we didn't lose 40%-50% of the males. Try again. There is NO scenario where men die en mass without women also dying.
Now, do you have an argument about how women are valuable in modern society or are you going to keep living in fantasy land?
Funny thing is ops right, lets take a look at what will happen if men stopped showing up for work.
Going along with this reproductive thread, females are even more valuable in modern society than they ever were back then. There are fewer viable wombs, and medicine ensures that the viable wombs can produce an even greater number of surviving war-fodder babies. Conservatives don't push the "marry and multiply" meme for nothing. Condolences to those who cannot contribute to that ideal.
>So why does any of that matter
Are you that retarded?
Damn being a women sucks, your entie existence revolves aroud getting fucked and carrying a baby.. litrelly.
Oh and whining and bleeding out of your cunt every month.
>>tfw we're institutionally superior in every way
You're a second-class citizen because you're second-hand quality. Any, "institutional," benefits you get are from a man's pity, and not because you're valued to them.
>>tfw we're institutionally superior in every way
Nice denial, tranny.
>All these insecure roasties in this thread making up delusions to help them cope with their own inferiority
Denial always comes first when a truth is too hard for someone to bear. All women were created to serve and accompany men so they won't be lonely. That is why women depend on men for survival and not us on women. Women were made beautiful and pleasing in every way to men because they were a gift from nature/God. They were made in our reflection, but we rule over them because we are the superior. Hence their weak minds, emotions, their hole that is meant to be fucked by a man, defiling her insides as the bitch gender she is. Stay mad roasties, just enjoy sucking dick and serving men on Earth. This is your purpose and to make children for us as well, male children.
A second-class citizen is a person who is systematically discriminated against within a state or other political jurisdiction, despite their nominal status as a citizen or legal resident there. While not necessarily slaves, outlaws or criminals, second-class citizens have limited legal rights, civil rights and socioeconomic opportunities, and are often subject to mistreatment or neglect at the hands of their putative superiors.
>Argue all thread long you're more valuable because of a vagina and how you are "institutionally" superior.
>I'M SYSTEMATICALLY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST!
At least be consistent, sweetheart.
>Nowak drove from Houston to Orlando, Florida, on February 4-5, 2007. She packed latex gloves, a black wig, a BB pistol and ammunition, pepper spray, a hooded tan trench coat, a 2-pound drilling hammer, black gloves, rubber tubing, plastic garbage bags, approximately $585 (USD) in cash, her computer, an 8-inch (20 cm) Gerber folding knife and several other items before driving the 900 miles (1,400 km) to Florida. Early police reports indicated she wore space diapers during the trip
>The embarrassed astronaut subsequently described the incident as "very disheartening", adding: "There's still the psychological thing of knowing that we made a mistake and having to live through that. It was hardest coming back in and having to face everybody else."
>The orbiting toolbag was for some time a favourite among amateur sky-watchers, but finally re-entered the Earth's atmosphere and burned up last month.
The silence you hear from Mission Control, after she reports losing the bag, is every man slapping his forehead and screaming, "ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!" at the same time.
>>"tfw we're institutionally superior in every way"
>90% of condecensing /r9k/ posts are from the same people they condecend to. Ex. Wage slave threads are usually made by people on work breaks. Haha virginfags are pathetic threads are usually made by virgins.
D-Does this mean I found an actual girl on /r9k/
OP makes an interesting point but what you faggots need to consider
CHECK THIS 5 MOTHERFUCKERS
Roasties and beta white knights gtfo. this is why we cant ever having anything nice becuz of faggots like you white knighting for women. Ruining threads where we are drowning in roastie tears
Actually, I'm one of the guys toasting that roast. This thread has been neatly wrapped up already. There is literally NOTHING a woman can say or do to salvage this thread.
Might as well seal it off with a celebration.
You like Huey Lewis and the News?>>26435899
>implying repeating digits arent the superior gender
There is only one clear winner
>Yo Bateman the thread is getting back on track
>I'll be back in
So if women are so worhtless why the fuck is this place filled with "tfw no gf" and "i'm never gonna find a girl to be with bloo bloo bloo my life is so miserable", yeah you guys are shining examples of success.
Because no guy here has actually accomplished anything remotely useful so they try to make themselves feel better. Women are said to be the "inferior" ones when the dudes here can't even step outside their house without shaking. It's pretty sad.
>Because no guy here has actually accomplished anything remotely useful so they try to make themselves feel better.
op goes on about mens accomplishments as a whole but none of his personal accomplishments.