Should single men be taxed extra? Men are supposed to provide

>>26422836
fuck off feminazi b8

If they make me pay extra taxes I'll be sure to avoid paying, even going so far as to burn money so that I'll go to jail and get to live off state.

>>26422836

Married couples already get tax breaks, what the fuck more do you want, roastie?

Might as well ask for a law to be passed for all single roasties with a half nig kid to be given a government assigned beta as their provider.

>>26422836
I dunno but I think we should kill you and harvest your organs for generalized, nationwide medical support because you're such a fucking retard and you're failing to make good use of them.

>>26422836
This is some real amatyeur bait

>>26422836
so women get to get off scot free from paying extra again cause some fucking drug addict already siphoned her own money? no thanks

>>26422836
>Should single men be taxed extra?
WE ALREADY ARE!

>>26422836
Should women who select thugs as mates and/or are genetically unfit be sterilized and deprived of the right to vote, drive and own any property? Women are supposed to be the gatekeepers of sex and reproduction, but they're obviously incapable of managing it correctly and caused the dysgenic apocalyptic mess that we see today.

File: 1452753094381.jpg (168KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 800x600px

>>26422836
lmao just another tax to avoid

That's hot as hell, dude.

>>26422836
>spare resources they're failing to invest in families of their own.
a family is not an investment, it is a drain on your finances

>>26422987
>>26422892
>>26422862
You fools. We have already reached this point. Even the assigned beta orbiter thing has happened. Some guy has to pay child support for kids that are not his because he "assumed the role of father". Single men already get taxed more. Where do you think that money is going?

>>26422892
>>26422989

It should be proportional to how much you're neglecting your role as a potential family provider. For each year after age 18 that you don't at least have documented proof of a gf (e.g. photo of gf holding your hand, hugging you, and/or kissing you) you should have to pay a higher amount, so at 19 you owe $1,000 for the year, at 20 you owe $5,000, at 21 you owe $10,000, at 22 you owe $20,000, etc.

>>26423074
Is this some kind of masochistic financial domination fantasy?

Single men hoard money, the make money and spend it only on themselves and save the rest.

Families spend much more due to numbers of mouths to feed.

One stimulates the economy and one just hoards wealth. So a singles tax would make sense for the benefit of the greater good.

>>26423065

I know, I know. But what can I do? I stopped dating after getting tired of roastie bullshit, and won't put myself in a position be pay child support. What more can I realistically do to stick it to this system?

>>26423074

A lively underground market will spring up, with women offer services just to pretend to be someone's gf to help avoid these taxes.

>>26422836
>Should single men be taxed extra?
>Men are supposed to provide for families
I thought men and women were equals?

You're being a little sexist here m8
Women should be taxed more because they're the ones neglecting to create families because they ride the cock carrousel instead until their early 30s.

>>26423131

>A lively underground market will spring up, with women offer services just to pretend to be someone's gf to help avoid these taxes.

At least then you'll be paying a girl money to pretend to be your gf so she can invest in her own family.

>>26423121

For the greater good? Or for some cunt roastie and the son of Tyrone?

If we truly cared about the greater good we would let people become responsible for their own mistakes, instead of punishing innocent bystanders for them.

>>26423162

Nah, I'll just hire a trap

>>26422836

so happy i don't live in Shillary-ruled USA lmfao

imma laff @ u faggots so hard next year haha

>>26423121
Women refuse to have families and prefer hedonistic sex with Chad.

So abolishing their rights and turning them into property would make sense.

File: image.jpg (112KB, 1114x677px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1114x677px

>>26423074
This is a bad idea. Supporting families is a good idea in theory, but in reality it's not gonna work. If women are allowed to live uninhibited by any standards or expectations, they tend to party, drink excessively and irresponsibly, have unsafe sex, and largely neglect their children.

I've seen it dozens of times from women of all races and backgrounds. There are some good single mothers, but even then, statistically speaking single mother households create an absolutely insane amount of convicts, repeat felons, depressed and mentally ill children, teenage pregnancies, the list goes on.


If we're going to make an insane tax, the better tax would be one for single women. That way, they'd have incentive to stay in a relationship.

>>26423074

Swedes have this retarded system where you can register being "sambo" with a girl.

But that's pure fucking socialism. Forget about that shit ever happening in the USA or any non-cuck country for that matter.

Enabling whores and reckless sex is fucking retarded.

imagine all the guys who form bro armies and register as gay couples to avoid the tax lmfao

if shillary is ever elected this is most likely what's gonna happen

>>26423178
greater good as in more money in the economy. Which means more money to spend on science, education, health, jobs and a better city etc.

If we truly cared for the greater good, we wouldn't live so selfishly.

>>26423588

But roasties having sex irresponsibly and having half nig kids that Tyrone does not take care of takes more money out of the economy, and results in less money being spent on science, education, health, jobs, and so on.

The law you're suggesting creates the opposite outcome of what you're preaching.

File: 1453926532681.gif (17KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x400px

>>26423467
>feminists pissing and moaning about the sanctity of marriage when dudes start showing up to do this en masse

It all comes full circle.

Babymakers should pay taxes because there is already overpopulation. More and more automatic production will decrease the number of workers who are needed. Therefore population should shrink.

>>26422836
Top kek women just want female supremacy not equality.

>>26423715

but why, i thought they were inherently submissive

>>26422836
If the tax is aimed towards cis men I'm going to claim to be a transbian that doesn't wan't to take horomones or sex reassugnment surgery.

>>26422836
Watch the film Lobster.

>>26423721
to Chad

File: 1450053316343.jpg (256KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1920x1080px

>>26423721

It's a society wide shit test. They want to submit, but only to those that will force them into their place and not apologize for it. If the males let them get away with shit like this, then they're clearly too weak to submit to, so they'll do what they can to weaken the civilization so the non-pussified invade or are even directly imported. See: the european "refugee" crisis.

>>26423829

shit son i've thought the same too, with the refugees

european men are such fucking cucks their women are literally trying to hit the reset button on alphaness and causing a reffo shit storm

holy fuck if that ain't a call to beta orbiters then idk what is

File: CI8emnhUEAEyFL5.jpg (27KB, 495x495px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 495x495px

>>26422836
>Should single men be taxed extra?

Holy shit Batman kill yourself

>>26423131
Go below $30K.

File: 1278461971697.gif (784KB, 291x204px) Image search: [Google]

784KB, 291x204px

>>26422836
https://youtu.be/umDr0mPuyQc

>>26423640
there are more selfish people and single men than there are roasties having sex and if you don't tax where you can, in this case single men, then its sectors like education that will suffer from the lack of funding.

Without that funding more roasties will occur. So suck it up today's pain is tomorrows gain.

Yes, single men should be taxed.
Every man who works should take 4 orphans to college.