He's wrong, studies disprove and destroy one guy comparing a sentient species to any nutritious substance that people or animals eat or drink or that plants absorb in order to maintain life and growth.
>>26390113 >who cares if your cereal had 48 dicks in it, be a real man and eat it anyways Alternatively: >woman eats delicious and tasty but unhealthy cereal filled with sugar >gets older and switches over to Cheerios >not exciting or as good, but it's healthy >every once in a while has a cheat day and enjoys some unhealthy cereal
It is not about the sex, it is about what the sex symbolizes: the giving of enough trust to engage in the reproductive act, when the two people are at their most vulnerable and can - even by accident - bring new life into the world.
So, yes, the number of people one has given that trust to DOES detract from the importance of it, and does degrade the overall quality of the experience as a result.
Also, if you're a whore, rarely is that limited to sex. That kind of mentality is not something men find attractive in a person who is meant to bare and raise children with you. Friendly reminder that sex is about procreation and not base pleasure seeking. That kind of intimacy being thrown around like a dirty hand towel is disgusting, and anyone who says otherwise is either a cuck or a whore.
No, I wouldn't be offended that someone would only chose to eat me once they were aging and desperate, I wouldn't be offended that someone spends their youth enjoying crunchy nut and nesquik only to settle on me for what health benefits I can provide years later
>>26390113 The girlfriend is the cereal, not the amount of people she's slept with. It doesn't matter how many how many different cereals you've tried there's nothing wrong with a bit of diversity. What matters is when your cereal has had 48 dicks inside it and looks like a fucking roastie, that's when the amount of people you've slept with matters. Fuck outta here.
>>26390113 He's right about men and women being held to different standards. Man whores should be treated as much like sluts as the sluts they sleep with. Chads are not bros, they ruin virgin women for virgin men.
>>26390971 jokes on you, I don't care I'm really desperate, yes >>26391016 I guess so, but I'm not sure she's the person I could have nice gay talks with. It doesn't seem like she could talk about anything but these cocks she sucks.
I believe people should match up with equal sex history, it is normal for virgins to want virgins etc. I do not understand this double standard that women can now have their cake and eat it too but guys have to suffer just because they are stupid ugly men virgins.
>>26390113 WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT ? >you can't be turned off by a girl being a slut because that makes you an asshole
Why ? Why the fuck not ? It's a personal preference, am I not allowed to have one ? That's literally what turns me off and I will call her out for being one. Why are women entitled to preferences ? They can not date a guy because he's fat and call him out for it. They can ignore a guy cause he's ugly and call him out for it . But god forbid I dislike a slut who's had 10+ dicks in her mouth cause that somehow makes me the bad person. Liberals are the cancer of this planet.
>>26391233 He's a nu male faggot spouting cancerous ideas, I want him and people like him to die horrible deaths, they're ruining society. He literally wants you to feel bad about having personal preferences when it comes to women and to make you look like the bad person when you don't want to change your values according to his will.
>>26391795 Wait what are you even saying? Can you stop speaking in memes for a second and tell me whether or not your a virgin? If you've never had casual sex how would you know whether it devalues the experience? I'm seriously wondering where your delusion comes from
>>26391057 they are not being held to different standards actually, men who indulge in easy sex (i.e. prostitution) are scorned just as much as women who indulge in easy sex.
chad does not have easy sex. he has to use his charm and social skill to have sex with women. which is obviously easy for chad as he was born with those things but is difficult for 80% of the male population. that is why men who have lots of sex cannot be compared with women who have lots of sex, because they need to use entirely different methods to do so.
>>26392012 But I mean why do you think that it would ruin a girls view on sex? I'm actually really curious I feel like this opinion is all based on Internet logic... Would it be bad if I was to date a girl with 20 partners??
>>26392095 It does symbolize love and trust but it doesn't have to and it can be detached from said emotion and then reattached. You fuck a slut different than you fuck your gf. I've dated virginal girls and slutty girls the slutty ones are less repressed sexually but the loving is still very real... At least for them I'm so far gone I don even believe in love
>>26392072 Men and women initiate/receive sexual initiations differently. The average woman has it far, FAR easier than the average man. All she has to do is nod her head and look pretty. The average man has to be active, as opposed to impartial, which is why the lock and key analogy actually makes sense. It doesn't ruin a girl's view on anything, it just shows that she's hedonistic and has pure judgement. She has to have willpower to prevent sex, as opposed to men who use willpower to get sex. It's a sign of weak character and general disregard for intimacy
Holy shit, people have become so cucked that the continuous action of a woman is considered not a problem at all, yet the thought of a man is like treason or some stupid shit.
>>26391448 This right here is logical and objective reasoning. Believing the "live and let live" meme isn't. If you're going to interact with other people, you need to have some interest and investment in them beyond the vapid "feels gud man"
>>26392128 That's fine and I agree with the idea that you are saying but this doesn't defend what the OP guy said. Ill still think the girl who fucked 40 guys is a slut and I would never love her vs the girl who fucked like 1 or 2 guys.
>>26392137 I guess but I mean I never really try to get laid I literally >just b yourself bro And that's the only reason I'm a whore. Trust me if you didn't have to try you would be a slut too. I feel like a lot of rk9 is detached from reality. You're saying that because it's easy to have sex it's bad to have a lot. Why? I mean why is it virtuous to abstain from sex? What about it is good??
>>26392261 It's not that sex is bad, it's that being intimate with multiple people is. This might trigger you but many people view sex as an intimate expression of love and trust rather than something to do drunk in the room of some random man you only met that night.
>>26392287 I can tell you very rarely talk to women. Like just as peers in a work or class environment. You purely talk to them to pursue them. That's what I'm getting at. I have yet to meet a women that robots would want to be with that wants to be treated like this alien being. Can you have preferences, sure. But don't be surprised when most women hate you for that double standard.
>What if a girl isn't a virgin because her long term boyfriend died or left her for a reason having nothing to do with her? Is she still unpure? Being in a long term monogamous relationship is what humans do. It's not about simply the act of fucking
>>26392321 Listen I'm a guy and I have had several loving relationships I understand sex for love... But the thing is that's not the only way you can have sex. Things aren't black and white there are shades of grey. Loving sex can be brutal bdsm and one night stands can be very intimate. Why must you only have loving sex?? What makes it inherently bad to have casual sex?? Std's are a good answer but let's assume we all stay clean
>>26392366 Dude I'm not even talking about fucking women. I'm talking about how you suck at communicating and working with half the population. That was what my original comment was about. You can go on tinder and pump and dump a million women but don't be mad when the only people you meet are roastie whores because that's all you look for.
>>26392412 You're blatantly ignoring what he is saying. This isn't about why it's bad to fuck a bunch, go ahead honestly, it's about how sex loses its intimacey after you do it a bunch and people would prefer to not get involved with that.
>In 1930 women who werent married and spent time with a man could easily be branded as a whore/loose woman >If women didnt have long pants at the beach, they got fined
>Today its norm that women whore around with a million dicks, every girl you know had a gangbang >The upset, ugly and deformed femanons who have values similiar to guys, are just mad they are defected, but secretly wants to be gangbanged >Women are pretty much nude today, women dream of a society where only chad and tyrone exists, and all the girls are nude getting gangbanged on the street.
>Tfw tall, strong, handsome, intelligent, gorgeous, cool, super cool, kindhearted but brave, sweet voiced, fair >Pretty much a perfect person, a catch >Tfw no girls actually interest me I want to give my parents grandchildren, you know? What's a guy like me to do..
>>26392190 >>26390268 All for you. Marriage and family related materials. Links http://www.medicaldaily.com/ignorance-bliss-when-it-comes-marriage-fewer-partners-youve-had-more-likely-your-298752 http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2012/08/more-promiscuity-data.html
>>26392791 nofap my friend. porn is degeneracy. sluts too. you wannabe chads ruining the good gurls too. us virgins too afraid to speak with a girl too. real chads and good girls are the ultimate masterrace
>>26392984 >you should hold yourself to that say standard instead of using misogynistic mental gymnastics to make it okay for men to be promiscuous. It isn't mental gymnastics if women prefer 'experienced' men and it takes skill for men to gain that experience. Giving men some more leeway than women allows them to develop the skills to attract women.
But regardless, I'd argue that sex and intimacy in society is more intricate than something that could be derived from specific differences in the male and female brain.
It's not like women are wired with a "promiscuous" brain or "prude" brain while men have a switch that they can control this with. It seems more like you're grasping at straws justification than drawing real conclusions.
>>26393300 >women prefer 'experienced' men and it takes skill for men to gain that experience Complete conjecture. I doubt women would agree to this double standard.
>>26393344 It's misogynistic to dislike or insult women solely for the amount of sexual partners they have had. You're right, people aren't necessarily misogynistic if they want women to be a virgin while they are not, but I really enjoyed the alliteration it set up for me.
>>26393485 So men have more sexual desire, so they should be able to fuck and women shouldn't be able to? Why can't they just beat off?
>>26393563 >It's misogynistic to dislike or insult women solely for the amount of sexual partners they have had. It's not at all, hating one type of woman =/= hating all women.
>So men have more sexual desire, so they should be able to fuck and women shouldn't be able to? It's harder for them to abstain. >Why can't they just beat off? But so many already have, take a look around you at this board.
For a man to meet a woman and sleep with her he has to have a desirable trait (i.e tall, good looking, confident, funny, handsome, successful etc) he then would have a shitload of hoops to jump through in order to be invited back to hers/take her back to his
for a woman to to the same all she has to do is be present
The only people who don't are literal niggers who think with their dicks and sluts who want to soften the impact of their own ways and of course media has been blasting this idea for generations now at the destruction of the traditional family.
>>26393563 >Complete conjecture. It's something I've observed and I believe it based on how well it explains why women dislike virginal guys so much and why they fall for guys who are obviously players.
>>26393416 Your source suggests that there is many similarities between human male and female brains, I agree this is the case. But there are some key differences in male and female brains that definitely create not so minor differences in our behavior. www.brown.edu/Courses/BI_278/Other/Clerkship/Didactics/Readings/Sex%20Differences%20in%20the%20Brain%20-%20Implications%20for%20Explaining%20Autism.pdf
Also Robert salpolskys stuff on YouTube is really interesting related stuff, but they last for hours so I doubt this thread will 404. Here is the link anyway: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LOY3QH_jOtE
>>26394009 While I don't agree with your opinion, at least you are (sorta) fair.
>>26394114 It may be true, but I think that the reason women (and many men) dislike virgins is because they suspect they'll get too attached too quickly. I can't reason why they'd fall for obvious players, I don't know enough about psychology or human sexuality.
>>26394184 Of course they do, just as I'd rather have a successful and ambitious woman. She'd push me to do better in my life.
>>26391791 because sex is not JUST sex, you fucking troglodyte. imo it's a very personal and sensitive experience that should only be shared if you enjoy the company of, care for, and want to make another precious memory with the person you love.
>>26390113 women sleeping with 100 men:an easy task that is accomplished by very ugly women all the time. In fact ugly women can get hundreds of men to PAY for it man sleeping with 100 women: Needs looks, charm, money, etc
>>26390113 fuck off op i don't give a shit about woman sleeping around just don't expect us to marry you or date you. also don't come back crying to us when men are not loyal anymore. I am getting sick and tired of you fucks shoving this shit down our throats.
>>26397743 >tfw you realize that if you made a cartesian graph of penis proximity to John Green's wife (with every different graphed line being a different penis, y-axis being time, negative x-axis values indicating distance of penis from John Green's wife and positive x-axis values indicating degrees of inside-John-Green's-wifeness), John Green's line would get extremely close to a positive value while remaining just barely negative, then veer wildly into the negatives for many units of y, during which time numerous other penis graphs would repeatedly achieve values well in excess of x=0 for many many units of y, as their owners variously penetrate John Green's wife's face, vagina, and anus, and then ultimately John Green's line would precipitously near x=0 again, remain near-but-not-exceeding-x=0 for relatively much longer than several of the other lines before him did, and then FINALLY cross x=0
>>26393207 >ew that guys a virgin yo wtf? Im a virgin, and my girlfriend is not. I told her straight up idgaf that she isn't one, I wish she was but that simply isn't the case. But because I AM a virgin, everyone and their mother wants to fuck me because of it. Idk, girls are hoes and want to collect Vs even more than men do. Or atlas thats what Ive noticed.
In general women find it offputting to know that an adult male is a virgin because what that indicates to them is that he's unsuccessful at getting girls to like him , and girls instinctively, subconsciously want to avoid that incase their son turns out the same way.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.