Robot Exodus: Nighttime Edition

>>26355715
Fuck you faggot just go to wizchan

Worshipping females is so fucking degenerate.
Also I like /hiki/ because it reminds me if NHK

>>26355789
Wizardchan has more restrictive rules and is a dead board. Plus why should we?

>>26355801
I like /hiki/ too because it really is the perfect description.

>>26355824
Quit dividing the fucking userbase, our board is pretty good considering, why change it? You sound like a sniffy little autist

>>26355861
>our board is pretty good considering
must be why 432 people want to get a new board

>>26355861
>Pretty good
>Is basically /b/ without roll threads

>>26355898
Because they are dumbasses like you, who dont realize it will make things worse and maybe even end up like wizchan

>>26355861
It's full of normies.
Seriously, so many threads pop up about.
>Muh GF/ex
>My friends
>Leaving the house
>Females fucking post here
>Worshipping females
>Obsessing over sex/getting a GF
>Non-NEETs
>etc.
This place is normie central. We need to fucking get a new board.

File: for wiz.png (101KB, 908x286px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 908x286px

>>26355953
I post this picture in every thread because it fits our situation perfectly

Just going to say, I think /hiki/ is a fantastic name. Whoever came up with it is a smart guy. Goes along with the Japanese roots of 4chan, and hikikomori is just a great word.

>>26355989
I want a full list of names before I make a strawpoll in the /qa/ for people to vote on

although I do think /hiki/ will win

>>26355715
There shouldn't be a /wiz/.

Normies should just get the fuck off my board.

>>26355937
What the fuck do you want? Feels threads? We have those all day long. Its nothing like /b/ and the userbase is one of the best than on any board ive seen

>>26356019
This

>>26355953
Most of those are trolls which we will have on every board

File: front page of r9k.png (1MB, 1782x668px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1782x668px

>>26356034
>Its nothing like /b/ and the userbase is one of the best than on any board ive seen

>>26356013
>/wiz/
>/beta/
>/hiki/
>/r10k/
>/robo/
>/virg/
>/vrg/
>/bot/
Think those are all the ones I've seen thrown around.

>>26356034
Right because I can totally relate to all those "robots" who are "depressed" because their gf left them, or those "robots who get invited to 2 parties and don't know which one to go to, or that one chad who is faced with the difficult choice of staying loyal to his gf

>>26356090
>>26356013
you guys forgot the best one
/ree/

>>26356084
You have to ignore the trolls and shitheads like on any board

>>26356090
/dep/ - depression (though not as suiting in my opinion)


Guys, keep suggesting names. I'm compiling them.

but idk, so many rules would destroy the "4chan essence" in it
what would any board be without shitposting?
literally, it would get pretty boring, don't get me wrong tho

File: 1350604222359.png (84KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 500x500px

Stop linking /qa/ god damn it.
It is not /q/. Every board implemented has been requested for YEARS aside from /news/ which was Hiro's own idea.
/qa/ was so good in the time after moot's QA and hiro's but not it's full of bullshit fags like you that treat it like /q/ instead of a fun unlisted board for oldfags and meta discussion.

>>26356138
>so many rules
>currently 4 rules
>soon to be a possible 6

that's not many

File: tumblr_lx7ntrusAA1qzug70o1_500.gif (57KB, 318x634px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 318x634px

WWIIIIIZ!

>>26356157
but you're starting to limit the threads too much
you should just ban normies and women and be done with it

>>26356105
>>26356125
Here u goriginal

>>26356154
>/qa/
>Fun
>Not full of bullshit fags

Literally whining: the board.

File: Deathkorpsgeneral.jpg (52KB, 478x800px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 478x800px

Vorwarts! Fur /wiz/!

>>26356157
you should just try to create rules about things robots actually complain about, and the only thing we complain about are
>normies
>helpful normies
>fembots
>roasties

>>26356176
>limit threads too much

the rules are incredibly simple. You can post a wide variety of things really as long as you don't violate the very few rules that are there. In a way, it's a random board for robots.

>>26356130
/dep/ isn't fitting at all.
>>26356118
/ree/ is a good one.
>>26356138
There aren't many rules
>don't say you're a woman
>don't say you're a nonvirgin
>no shitty /soc/ threads
The only one I'm iffy on is the porn one. Let's say a poster creates a thread about a certain fetish, asking if other people have this fetish. For example, we get some armpit threads once in a while. Would those be banned under that rule?
Otherwise, shitposting is still possible, it will just take some creativity. You can take the man out of shitposting, but you can't take the shitposting out of the man.

I think the rules are great overall.

File: 1376302932507.jpg (67KB, 500x334px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 500x334px

>>26356184
Which is why I said it isn't /q/.
Fags like OP and his brigade are why it is so shitty now. It's treated like /q/ by underage faggots wanting their opinion heard because they think it means anything.

File: 1449459826949.jpg (134KB, 802x817px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 802x817px

Make a /wiz/ board on 8ch DOT NET

Here we go again. OP, answer me straight - do you really fucking think this board will be created given the current rules? Do you think whoever is going to review your application will say "no grills? k, sounds gud"?

Second question: How can you be this autistic? Just make a board designated for robots with no rules, and let the mods enforce an anti-trolling/shit-posting policy. /r9k/ is not explicitly a robot board. This will be. That's all we need.

File: 1397215171303.png (191KB, 322x287px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 322x287px

>>26355801
>Also I like /hiki/ because it reminds me if NHK
Holy shit dude, me too.
I'm like such a neet LOL.
One day I was home because I didn't go to a party and I was like SUCH a total hikki. My bro said it was like that NHK show and oh my god we are such nerds!
fucking christ, /r9k/. You managed to hit a new low.

File: name poll.png (811KB, 724x712px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 724x712px

So far this is what I have

Keep 'em coming

>>>/qa/439035

File: zzzzip.jpg (31KB, 262x489px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 262x489px

Finally, robots will get their own special home on the chins, /r9k/ will be free of their cancer and stale memes, everyone wins

>>26356223
yeah no porn rule is stupid
I really doubt assholes would turn /ree/ into a porn board, when there is /gif/, /hc/, /s/

>>26355715
don't want to be the sjw police, and I understand the whole 'females can't be robots', but shouldn't rule one be something like:

>1) Posters cannot reference or imply their gender.

keeping it completely anonymous. that way your secret clubhouse will have a higher chance of coming around at a cheaper cost

>>26356392
that will be impossible

the male gender is referenced a lot within robot discussions

>>26356392
women can't be robots anyway dude
that rule is ridiculous
would a woman complain about being 5'7? seriously dude, think before posting

>>26356410
>>26356428
just thought that it would help your board come to fruition rather than having a janitor go out of their way to hunt down every single female post

>>26356392
If it's an issue when the admins consider it, we should take it into consideration. Otherwise, it's good as it is. There are a lot of male discussion threads on /r9k/, about fapping and shit like that.
>>26356364
I agree with this.
I understand the basis of the rule, but I think it needs to be a bit more specific. How exactly I'm not sure, but it needs work. It's such a slippery slope. An OP could post an NSFW image without intentions of fawning, but anons could easily derail the thread with a post or two, and it would be gone. The rule needs to be a bit more specific, otherwise it might as well be a SFW board because every NSFW post is at high jeopardy of going wrong.

>>26356455
I understand your point, but people who want to be janitors aren't in short supply.

I bet there are thousands of posters who wouldn't at all mind being a janitor for a week or two at a time, and then passing off the responsibility to another robot for another couple weeks.

This would guarantee that bad janitors wouldn't get to stay around, and moderation of topics would always stay balanced and fresh.

File: 1452822997397.jpg (1MB, 2560x1706px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1706px

>>26356479
>I understand the basis of the rule, but I think it needs to be a bit more specific. How exactly I'm not sure, but it needs work. It's such a slippery slope. An OP could post an NSFW image without intentions of fawning, but anons could easily derail the thread with a post or two, and it would be gone. The rule needs to be a bit more specific, otherwise it might as well be a SFW board because every NSFW post is at high jeopardy of going wrong.
that's a good point

any suggestions on how to word the rule?

>>26356544
idk, make the poll for the name, will you?
include /ree/ I like it plz

File: 1427770962195.png (16KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 500x500px

>>26356647
http://strawpoll.me/6767987

k boys, poll for the name is up! Vote now!

File: 432432.gif (4KB, 650x220px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 650x220px

>>26356519
what you just desribed with the janitors was essentially /z/

look how that turned out.

>>26356678
>hiki
anything else is fucking retarded

>>26356678
what /hiki/ stands for?

>>26356743
Hikikomori

from wikipedia:

>Japanese term to refer to the phenomenon of reclusive adolescents or adults who withdraw from social life, often seeking extreme degrees of isolation and confinement.

File: Pepelaughing.jpg (8KB, 226x223px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 226x223px

>>26355952
If all the real robots go away, r9k would be a boring shithole and you normies know it

>>26356544
>3. NSFW images are allowed so long as they are not posted for pornographic purposes (i.e. posted to start or add to a discussion).

It's a little bit hard to enforce, but it makes it so OPs wouldn't suffer the consequences for posters derailing an innocent thread. Janitors would play it by ear. Links should be allowed, so as to not disrupt discussion of pornography use in masturbation discussion threads. Otherwise, porn isn't an integral part of the board- if you want to discuss a fetish, an OP image should be allowed to attract attention, but porn dumps can stay on /r9k/ and other boards. Everybody wins this way.

At worst, we could try implementing one porn general, stickied and refreshed every 300 posts or so. Not sure if that's a good idea though, generals signal the death of boards.

>>26355715
why would robots use this board when they don't use wizchan?

>>26356777
this so much
>r9k without >tfw's
>no more spaghetti spilling greentexts

>>26356838
The rules are a lot more strict over there, the wizchan is a lot slower than /hiki/ would be, and because 4chan is technically superior and runs much more smoothly.

Plus, 4chan is just a far more popular website. Word would spread, but the rules would keep normies from shitting it up. The popularity of the site would draw at the very least a decent poster base. I suspect many posters who main other boards would be able to pop in and actually share feels, where as they can't on /r9k/ since it's become such a shithole.

>>26356897
this

someone should just screenshot this to end the tireless question of "why don't you just go to wizchan?"

File: why not wizchan.jpg (35KB, 1624x120px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1624x120px

>>26356966
There ya go OP.
Any progress on the pornography rule? I agree with :>>26356809
keeps porn dumps from happening but still allows for quality NSFW discussion.

>>26356176
>ban a group of people you cannot even agree on a definition for

Yeah, its easy

>>26357006
how do you make 4chan black?

>>26357029
At the bottom right, see Yotsuba? Click on the dropdown menu and select Tomorrow.

>>26357029
there are color options for 4chan at blacked.com

>>26357045
thx man
>>26357052
why would you do something like that ;_;

>>26357006
>>26356809

I'm thinking of just adding in a little bit to the original rule


3) Do not make porn threads or post porn (clothed and nude) for the sole intent of fawning over <unless it is related to a discussion> but NSFW posting is allowed.

>>26357100
That's good actually, keeps the original intention and keeps OPs from getting their threads deleted because of posters dumping porn. Pretty much perfect now OP.
>>26357085
no problem family man

>>26356777
>>26356851
The robots can still post on /r9k/, nobody is trying to change that.

Having a separate board especially for robots, IN ADDITION to leaving /r9k/ the way it is, is the right way to go forward.

What do you guys think of fetish threads and big belly gf threads?

>>26357243
sounds more like /b/ material.

it's good fun sometimes, if this new board goes through, i feel it would be best to leave that stuff on /r9k/.

>>26357281
So where exactly do you draw the line when it comes to rule #3

>>26357243
Big belly gf threads, in my eyes, fall under fetish threads.
I would like fetish threads.I do have a fetish that I have no other board to actually discuss on, and I don't think there's anything wrong with them since rule 3 keeps them from becoming porn dump threads. It's just another topic to be discussed, like masturbation. Rule 3 keeps it in check.

>>26357303
How do you prevent a thread when discussing a fetish and posting a picture relevant to the discussion from turning into a porn dump thread? Seems like fetish threads would just be an excuse for porn dumping.

>>26357297
That's a good point, I don't really have an idea for that

On second thought, I guess fetish/big belly threads would be fine, but wouldn't they promote porn threads eventually?

If there is a fetish thread on /hiki/, and people start posting porn relevant to the fetish, is that fine?

>>26357303
This
I come to /r9k/ to discuss my armpit fetish, since there's no other place to actually talk about it, they're all just porn dump boards.
/hiki/ is about robots the ideal thread for robots. Not only are strange fetishes a common characteristic of robots, but discussion of those fetishes is always fun, especially just to see how odd some robots' fetishes are.
Rule 3 keeps it from becoming pornographic. I think fetish threads are a staple of actual robot discussion.

>>26357362
I think it would just inevitably turn to a porn dump. Can't fetishes just be discussed on all our other porn boards? We have a bunch

>>26357334
I think you should do it like /pol/ where it's nsfw, but no porn. pol is not modded well so porn is still posted alot there though.

>>26357380
>>26357334
You're right. My armpit fetish discussion can stay on /r9k/ and /tv/ when it comes up, it comes up often enough.
Although I think fetish discussion is pretty robotic, there is no way to keep it from becoming a porn dump, because any picture could just be said to be "adding to the discussion". Ban fetish threads, not mentions of fetishes though, much like gay threads are banned but saying you are isn't.

>>26357398
perhaps the original rule is ok.

I mean if it's relevant to the discussion and it's obvious, then it won't be something to be fawned over and not be against the rules.

I think the addition I made adds to much leeway

>>26355715

Man this would be great.

All the virgins and REEEEE posters can go to wiz

and all the chill virgins can stay.

I, for one have been waiting for a return to balance for almost 4 years.

This could be nice.

File: 1363156974683.jpg (48KB, 500x404px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x404px

>>26356743
>what /hiki/ stands for?
>>26357029
>how do you make 4chan black?

Is this really the group you want to share a board with, OP?
These are clearly children that have over a decade before they are wizards. I think wizchan itself is too lenient in regards to age and yet too strict elsewhere, but this highlights why /wiz/ or /hiki/ cannot be a thing here.
There are other boards that discuss these issues and they have strong condescension towards this blatant spoonfeeding newfaggotry.
I'd say "I don't know why I bother coming to this shitty board any more" but we all already know the answer to that.

File: frogposting.png (505KB, 684x838px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 684x838px

>all these votes
wew lad

>>26357428
Yeah, you're right. Janitors can easily distinguish if posters are the issue as opposed to OP. The original rule is just fine now that I reconsider it.

I think we have the perfect rules set up now, just need to choose a definitive name and get the admins to consider it.
>>26357456
There is truth to some posters concerns- too many restrictions can be deadly.
Age restrictions are not needed. A 30 year old could be a newfag and an underage can come across as an oldfag.
There's nothing wrong with newfaggotry inherently. So long as they followed the rules and didn't shit up the board, I don't see the problem with asking questions.

>>26356897
>the rules would keep normies from shitting it up
just like the rules keep r9k from being shitted up? I expect many will make it their business to fuck your board up for a laugh. better have some badass cunt of a mod or it'll turn to shit in no time.

Where are the angry normies? They usually love shitposting at this point.

>>26357635
Right here:>>26357621
He's scared when we leave /r9k/ will be too boring.
The only rule on /r9k/ is that your comment can't be identical to another person's. So no, it's not like /r9k/ because there are actual rules.

>>26357635
none of us are angry we want you gone faggots

>>26357677
Then you should fully support this board; it would be in your best interest.

>>26357658
kek, I'd LOVE the whiny neets to stay the fuck off r9k forever. I'm all for /wiz/ and want it to actually work for you

>>26355789
There's a whole chan of these losers? Man I will never run out of amusing internet things to read now!

:D (I fukken love smileys)

r9k is /b/ tier. it has gone to shit lately. way too many /b/ threads. shit is fucking annoying as fuck. dont even come here that much anymore bc of it.

How do we get the admin to notice this?

File: 1427746871350.jpg (938KB, 4500x4334px) Image search: [Google]

938KB, 4500x4334px

Friendly little bump

stop replying to his threads

ignore this faggot

Why don't you just go to wizchan? It's exactly what you want; it basically runs on 4chan's engine anyway.

>>26358331
theyre too young to know what wizchan is.

>>26358331
see
>>26356897

there is a very good reason for making it here

>>26355715

The people who want good OC and the outcasts can co-exist so long as no one shitposts.

>>26355898
>using poll with no captcha linked to multiple boards as a source

lel

>>26358363
by strict he means he cant shitpost like he does here.

i honestly hope the admins dont cater to these crybaby's.

>>26356298
>I literally cannot fathom people relating to welcome to the nhk

>>26358439
becuase if they do, whats that to stop some other "little group" wanting their own little club.

/other/ board for otherkin?

>>26358504
if there's enough demand for any board I have no issue with it being made.

but I doubt there would be any for an otherkin board.

>>26358504
or /mlp/ for bronoh wait

>>26358504
>otherkin

Oh sorry I think you missed your stop at >>>>>>>>/tumblr/

>>26358525
>"enough demand"

spamming thread after thread of stupid bullshit lome you?

>>26358600
see the poll

you're in the minority

File: 1439186427404.png (148KB, 293x380px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 293x380px

>>26355715
ok fuck you OP desu, refrained from posting in your shitty threads as I knew that the new board was going to be shit regardless.

First off you're calling this a robot exodus when you're still going to allow SHIT rose threads and other garbage. Hello? The whole "point" of your new board is to avoid femwhores, yet for some reason you'll allow them to be worshipped like gods? Yeah that definitely sounds different to r9k.

>>2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins. Exceptions:

There are no exceptions you dumb faggot, if people have "exceptions" they are just failed normalfags who think that they somehow fit into "omg le sekrit club i am a robot too lel"

You're a fucking retard and the new board IF it gets the rules you have suggested will be just as bad as r9k if not WORSE due to the amount of fem whores who will get the beta cult following them.

kill yourself you braindead idiot who couldnt even succeed at cloning the board he wants to make

ALSO

>allowing faggot/trap threads
its like you didnt want the board to have a chance at all, there is a /lgbt/ board you know. fucking retard

>>26358564
ha ha excellent burn fellow robot

i do agree we should have a safe space.

>>26358621
not to mention one can easily shitpost with the im not a virgin but have hired hookers threads.

Yes please so we can leave this shit hole to the lebbit normies. We have a pretty solid culture that's worthy of its own board since /r9k/ will no longer suffice. In addition

>worship threads do not fall under robot culture. they belong in /b/ and should be deleted immediately if outside of /b/. "generals" are what ruin non-random boards
>nothing about being gay is integral to robot culture so they don't need their own threads

>>26358741
I'll be adding in the no person worship threads rule and no gay threads and use some of the wording you provided

>>26358794
yeah just pass by my post retard, your trans threads are really going to be loved

>>26356279
The rule states not to SAY that you're a girl as it will derail discussion every time.

>>26355715

I agree. REEEEEEEEEEtards go. Get your own board. Leave here

Let's be real, the normies can't fucking stay away. They will just come and find some way to shit post once they realize a large amount of the board were actually robots and /r9k/ becomes a very boring /adv/ 2.0


normies are like crackers, they're obsessed with people lesser than them and don't want them to just be without their input

>>26358504
fucking newfags, boards are made for subcultures all the time
>>26358540
this

why dont you guys just go to wizchan?

File: happygook.jpg (108KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 640x640px

>>26355715

why does everybody want to go kill themselves? Does any of you actually do it?

>>26359072
Too dead. We were here before you normies anyway, at least we're trying to get our own board.

>>26359007
how many subculture boards are there on this site that arent general interests or containment boards?

>>26359101
>we

who's we and what makes someone a normie?

File: tumblr_nltxvhplW91tqmnnao1_1280.jpg (216KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 720x1280px

>>26359080

why do asians hate themselves so much?

>>26359115
idk, what's your point? robot history/culture is solid enough for its own board, who cares if it doesn't fall under interests or containment

>>26359072
wizchan has a policy where you can't whine about anything that might be seen as aspiring to become a normie.

>>26359132
>what makes someone a normie?

This just shows how far gone this board is and why us robots need our own.

>be total loser
>don't live at home
>will probably still be a looser after I stick it in someone
>have very few friends, and whenever they leave I'll be alone
>I'm apparently a normie and would be banned or censored because I'm not a 300 lb neet

Fuck, I agree this board is being shit up by literally r/eddits going for ebic tendies screencaps, but I'm not sure a bunch of autists trying to prove they're a bigger loser than everyone else is the solution.

>>26359271
Ah, I see the faggots on /qa/ trying to censor "r'eddit" whined loud enough.

>>26359145
robots have history? they have culture?

im just a loser who's too much of a pussy to do anything with my life. how does that qualify as a culture?

>>26359168
>aspiring to be normies

but that goes against the /wiz/ rules. you cant talk about normie shit.

>>26358621
>they are just failed normalfags who think that they somehow fit into "omg le sekrit club i am a robot too lel"
>someone is magically not a total fucking loser because they stuck it up some vagina

But anon, you said you were against female worship, and yet you elevate having sex with one to be some /r9k/ mortal sin.

>>26358618
The minority of people who didn't ignore this shitpost and actually bothered to vote, yes.

I feel you should not ban gay threads because many gay youth find themselves socially outcast and insel by circumstance

I do not feel they would be a significant part of board traffic and would not be a nuisance (unlike trap threads which I am in favour of banning). Better to start with them unbanned and ban them later if they prove to be a problem.

I also do not think the rules should be used to impose subjective morality, only promote the overall quality of posting

>>26359398
this would be the fisrt board to outright do something like that.

>>26355715
Reposting from old thread because of a triggered OP:

1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.

Absolutely retarded, Women can most certainly be social outcasts
>"bawww every women on earth can easily get fucked by men bawwww"
Not true at all. You act as though women instantly want to have sex. Some women are not interested in sex at all.

>Anyway, You forget to answer my concerns about the women who have a variety of disorders.
men will still date them. That's it.

You forget that the WOMEN in question is in the one who decides to have a relationship. Are you implying men can instantly say "woop were in a relationship :3" ? If women do not want to date, they are not going to date.
2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins.

Exceptions:
-the use of hookers for sex
-having been raped/molested

I Can agree with this too a degree.

3) Do not make porn threads or post porn (clothed and nude) for the sole intent of fawning over for but NSFW posting is allowed.
Blue board? okay.

4)Camwhoring(tinychat/omegle),hookup, "rate me" threads, and posts and threads regarding relationships should go on /soc/.

This is already in the global rules.

>>26359430

I don't see why it's necessary to restrict freedom of expression on moral grounds

To exclude people based on social standing is one thing, but to further discriminate within that group is unfair and uncalled for until a case is proven otherwise

i think it would be really terrible. i come to 4chan for laughs. if /r9k/ is as unfunny as it is (i swear it has had like 4 funny/interesting threads per year in the last 3 years), a board with idiots whining about how sad they are would be really, really fucking bad. this is coming from a 25yo kissless virgin who's been coming to /r9k/ since its first opening

>>26359489
REEEEEE

Gays, women and even blacks can't be robots!

This is the robot exodus. Do not stand in our way!

>>26355715
I don't understand. You're still a virgin if you fucked a hooker?

>>26359553

Why can't gays be robots? Many areas of the world are still fiercely homophobic and terrible for gays to live in.

Excluding them simply because you don't like their genes is arbitrary tyranny of the majority

>>26359619
becuase most of them are normies

>>26359652

Right, but those posters are already excluded by the existing rule set

Why create a rule that would only effect legitimate robots that just happen to be gay?

>>26359687
i dont know. talk with op about this.

board should be unlisted like /qa/?

yes/no

>>26355715
>1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women.
>2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are non-virgins.

It's pretty fucking unbelievable that people think this is worth using server bandwidth for

>>26359619
You can use this exact same logic to include women. I'm not saying don't include women, but if you use this to allow fags you have to allow women.

>>26359444
But being a celibate by choice is different from people who just can't figure out how to get others to sleep with them because they're fucking losers.

>>26359780

There are many posters here arguing that females should be allowed

Regardless, if you take the position that being female automatically elevates you to a higher social standing then you are still clear to exclude females and allow gays

>>26359780
Get outt of here normie

>>26359837
>maintaining logical consistency makes me a normie
That actually makes the rest of this thread make sense.

File: 1427611758562.jpg (113KB, 345x383px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 345x383px

>>26359398
>socially outcast because they are gay
>in the western world

How about just 1 rule:
If you're not a lonely virgin, get out

>>26359444
>woman chooses not to date
vs
>man who has no choice and is a social outcast that no one wants to date

Women can't be robots. Women have to choose to be lonely.

>>26359894
>implying 4chan is restricted to the western world
>implying middle america and the south is not still homophobic

>>26359828
But you specifically mentioned countries where it's a shitty place to be a fag, which has heavy overlap with countries where women are literally second class citizens. I'd much rather be the male loser I am now than a beautiful woman in Pakistan.

>>26359894
This. Outside of shit countries, fags are largely accepted, and I can personally think of a few situations where they're actively praised "for their courage".

File: 1427769718141.jpg (40KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x400px

>>26359915
America isn't a homophobic place anymore.

And if you feel so excluded for being gay, go on /lgbt/ to talk about it and make a thread about being gay. That's the whole point of the board.

>>26359707
>board should be unlisted like /qa/?
yes, definitely

>>26359924

The kind of oppression women experience in the developing world does not extend to the social realm

Women in these countries still have friends and sex, they just aren't afforded many of the benefits of enfranchisemnet and majority

Arguably they are even less entitled to post than socially isolated western women

>>26359915
I live in the South and the local transexual (tbf, I am pretty close friends with them) has a much larger social circle than I do and has had like 6 partners.

>>26359943

see my other posts

>>26359489
>>26359619
>>26359687

File: 1435171842424.jpg (176KB, 1635x1656px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1635x1656px

>>26360003
>I am pretty close friends with them
>them

>>26359910
do you have any substantial proof for this?

you cant ban certain people from posting because of a meme.

>>26360004
go to /lgbt to make gay threads

you're more than welcome to post in regular threads and mention you are gay, but /lgbt/ was designed for gay threads.

>>26360012
Not as in plural, but because it honestly makes me uncomfortable to refer to transanon via their preferred pronoun (wouldn't say it in public due to fear of ostracism).

File: 1434556861192.jpg (102KB, 712x615px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 712x615px

>>26360030
>do you have any substantial proof for this?

men have to take the initiative and approach women first and be aggressive in pursuing relationships. Women just choose to or to not open their legs.

That's how human relationships start.

>>26360036

I think you are making a mistake by enforcing the tyranny of the majority over freedom of expression

Let's agree to disagree

>>26359979
this is such horseshit

please someone screencap this to show admins.

>>26360084
I'm afraid we (all those who support /hiki/) can't agree to disagree, since out of the polls I've given, that's the only one that has a lower disparity between the two choices.

I recommend you leave some posts on the /qa/ thread for the ability to discuss it longer and have it looked at.

>>26360104

nice counter argument

File: Hitlerreaction.gif (1MB, 168x176px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 168x176px

>>26360104
>screencap to show admins
>ignoring there is a literal nazi board that the admins give no shits about

>>26360122

I am not invested enough in this to monitor the /qa/ thread, I will not be a poster of /hiki/

The fact is a poll is insufficient in situations like this, you have to err on the side of freedom and correct later if necessary. At one time a poll would have shown the majority of Americans supporting slavery.

File: 1419574047519.jpg (41KB, 560x840px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 560x840px

>>26360161
>At one time a poll would have shown the majority of Americans supporting slavery.
Considering how blacks act today, can you really blame them?

why do you have to do this here on 4chan, why cant you go somewhere else?

>>26360261
why can't you go somewhere else? /r9k/ was the hub of social outcasts and you just had to force your way in.

>>26360122
>>26360161
I'm one of the robots voted no for the gay ban. Why should gay robots be banned? It doesn't make sense. They've just got another layer of outcast on them. Why not ban black, white and brown robots too?

The definition of a robot is "A lonely male virgin". Nothing more, nothing less.

>>26360307
gay robots are not banned, just gay threads which should go on /lgbt/. This includes trap threads, tranny threads, etc.

We have a board for gay threads called /lgbt/.

>>26360330

So by that logic you would also ban food threads, tv/movie threads, music threads, anime threads, videogame threads, history and philosophy, politics, science etc?

>>26360295
nah i think you guys shoved your way in with your frog shit

>>26360395
gays and straights operate on a different level socially, famalama

gay threads would turn into shitposting.

>>26360446
how new are you?

Seriously

>>26360330
>girls are not banned, only posters who say they are girls!
>non-virgins are not banned, only posters who say they are not virgins!

OP, you have been asked this question many times, and never answer it. Why do you think anyone would create a board on 4chan that bans nearly every 4chan user? It has never been made and never will. Nobody will give you your "waaaaah no girls allowed" board.

You don't want a new board, admit it. You want a board where you get the power to ban people who trigger you. Therefore, it won't happen. You will never be made a mod, you entitled special snowflake. People have mentioned wizchan or reddit or 2*4ch. Go there instead for what you want.

>>26360456
all this is heresay

you dont know shit about anybody

dumbass

>>26360456

So if they do ban them then

I don't think they will as long as the other rules are enforced

>>26360471
>blah blah blah blah
like another anon said earlier. That is only an issue when the admin addresses us, otherwise it's pure conjecture

>>26360474
As I already said, /lgbt/ is for the gay lifestyle and will suit them better and it already exists and all gay threads should go there. /soc/ to /soc/, /lgbt/ to /lgbt/

and to reference what you said earlier
>So by that logic you would also ban food threads, tv/movie threads, music threads, anime threads, videogame threads, history and philosophy, politics, science etc?
those things are distributed among all lifestyles and are frequently talked about on every board.

>girls are not banned only poster's who say they are girls

how is this not the same thing?

>>26360596
are you saying women can't post without attentionwhoring their gender?
sexist

>>26360612
answer my question and explain this logical inconcistancy

dont just strawman me into your tumblr meme

>>26360660
>implying strawman

you clearly are being sexist right now. You're saying that women can't post without referencing their gender. That speaks very low of women on your part.

>>26360675
well in some or even most context's of storytelling its kinda hard to just be a faceless genderless anon.

>>26360721
women can't be robots, plain and simple. Plus any mention of their gender just derails a board for beta orbiting.

>>26360734
women can be robots i know you dont want to believe in that but they can.

its not plain and simple, people are complicated.

>>26360734
>women can't be robots, plain and simple
You base your entire crusade on this. And you're wrong, plain and simple.

You're no robot. You're a failed normie who is trying to false flag true robots into becoming more hated. You're obviously from plebbit, and want to bring the board culture over here. It won't work. Your plan has been unraveled. Now kindly fuck off and never come back.

>>26360762
No, they're not.

see
>>26360073

Just don't be super fat, but even then you'll find guy with a fetish for fat chicks

>>26360561
>those things are distributed among all lifestyles
And sexuality isn't?

>are frequently talked about on every board.
Wrong. You can't make videogames threads on /mu/, or movie threads on /v/.

Be honest OP you're getting in way over your head with all these rules. It's like you're pitching a movie.

>>26360777
>accuses me of being from reddit
>argues women can be social outcasts past puberty

I sure hope this post is ironic otherwise wow, you sure are new to this whole robot-normie thing.

File: 1426738311893.jpg (12KB, 316x202px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 316x202px

>>26360762
>>26360777
Normie whores go to /adv/ or /soc/ where you belong. How many skype threads have you searched for orbiters already?

File: 1418011687443.jpg (16KB, 231x244px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 231x244px

>>26360794
>You can't make videogames threads on /mu/, or movie threads on /v/.
and you won't be able to make lgbt threads on /hiki/

>>26360794
OP obvioisly thinks highly of himself

he really thinks he's going to get his OWN board.

he's not doing it for robots he's doing it for himself.

>>26360810
And you wonder why you have never been kissed? If you spent a fraction of the effort you do on hating and being afraid of girls into improving yourself, you would have lost your virginity already.

>>26360882
And anyone can post on /hiki/, including people with jobs or girls or nonvirgins.

>>26360917
>And you wonder why you have never been kissed? If you spent a fraction of the effort you do on hating and being afraid of girls into improving yourself, you would have lost your virginity already.
k

I don't see why you're so butthurt. /hiki/ won't be a board for your demographic. You just need to learn to live with that.

>>26360912
That's obvious to anyone but a few gullible faggots who are actually following him like he's their cult leader.

The funny thing is, if OP got his own board, it would turn to shit quickly because of the witch hunt mentality. Everyone would be banned left and right for being accused of being a normie.

File: 1427630840048.png (97KB, 1036x858px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1036x858px

>>26360942
Yes, that is exactly right

Everyone can post on any board on 4chan.

>>26360943
4chan will never give you your own board. You just need to learn to live with that.

>>26360943
well its actually MY demographic and i dont agree with the stupid rules.

>>26360973
So why the feminazi tumblr rules 1 and 2? They would never be allowed on 4chan.

>>26360959
>a few gullible faggots
http://strawpoll.me/6735185
>Everyone would be banned left and right for being accused of being a normie.
well there's only a handful of rules so we both know that won't happen. People may whine that someone isn't neet but the person they whine about won't get banned.

>>26360981
Uh oh. OP will now go all tumblrina on you.

>>26360981
>insults people based on their virginity and kissing status to put himself on a seat of superiority
>claims to be robot

No, it's not your demographic. Please learn to live with that. If you want to call yourself a robot if we get /hiki/ because you post on /r9k/, feel free to do that, but as of now, you are not a robot. You're just an average person.

>>26355715
Voted no famm

File: 1445401645409.png (438KB, 577x577px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 577x577px

>>26361009
>http://strawpoll.me/6735185
>500 yes, 150 no
>NORMIES ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>26361031
i actually am a robot tho

fuck you

>>26361002
As explained in previous threads, women can't be robots as social outcasts are largely men and in the presence of any vagina, they will beta orbit into oblivion. This will derail threads and bring about attentionwhoring and stupid threads like 'fembot feels' threads where guys try to get girlfriends from supposedly undateable women.

In regards to virginity, the majority of robots are virgins and the concept of intimate relationships are foreign to them and with a rule like that it helps to discourage normies from participating in the board and destroying it like /r9k/. It's widely known that virginity and robotness go hand in hand, but the rule is there just to stop normies and keep quality control.

File: bannaners_15.jpg (38KB, 450x375px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 450x375px

>>26361073
believe whatever you want

>>26361061
It's kind of cool

I've kept the strawpolls open in every /r9k/ thread and they've always stayed just around 3/4 yes 1/4 no

Even the first poll I did that only got around like 60 votes or so had the same thing.

>>26361090
which is also a good reason not to make this board.

i cant wait for an admin to seel the deal and put this fucker in his place

>>26361143
What is a good reason not to make this board?

We want a board based around the hikikomori lifestyle and listening to you talk about your 5 sexual partners or your ex-gf making you feel depressed won't fit in.

>>26361165
A board with rules such as 1 or 2 will never be created on 4chan. How many times does it have to be explained to you? Your "no gurrrrls allowed cuz I'm scared" club belongs on other sites like wizchan.

>>26361061
normies want you gone as much as you wanna be gone. why the fuck would anyone vote no on this?

>>26361198
>>26360500

original comment required (period)

>>26361090
honestly if your going to get blasted so easily when someome reveals a fact about themselves in your little safe space. why waste the effort, why waste bandwidth them when they can go fuck off somewhere else.

>>26355715

>Should person worship threads (Ashley Jones/Rose) be banned?

idolatry is repulsive, cast it out

there are none worthy of worship besides thrice-great kek, and the memes are his prophecy.

>>26361237
It's not being blasted so much as it's just a way to ensure quality control over the threads and prevent attention whoring and /soc/-tier threads. I don't see how that is so hard to understand.

>>26361245
surely Kek will help persuade Hiroshima into creating our board since we present him so with so many frog idols.

File: scan0002.jpg (693KB, 1085x842px) Image search: [Google]

693KB, 1085x842px

>>26361245
Hail to that. Blessed be, brother.

>>26361202
i dont want 4chan to be a place where crybabaies think they can get their own private forum from people and ideas they dont like if they kick and scream enough.

>>26361305
so like /mlp/?

I'm sorry, moral crusader, but it seems you were a little late to the party

>>26361281
You are a muslim aren't you?

>our men are raping women
>it's the fault of women for triggering us
>solution is to make women wear burkas!

>>26361061

I didnt vote to create /wiz/ to GO there.

I voted for REEE-posters to have their own board so I can talk to other robots.

I've been waiting for a long time for your type to fuck off. About 4-5 years. I'll finally have my board back.

>>26361281
>quality control

HA

>>26361281

>surely Kek will help persuade Hiroshima into creating our board

this is our board. schism will just erode the base of robots already here. the normies can be digested. the time they spend here is corrosive, whether they admit it or not. they are vectors for spreading the gifts, if not strictly 'people'.

let events take their course and we shall see, a new board is premature. we don't want to blow our loads.

>>26361285

blessed be.

File: 1427691408261.png (773KB, 900x1130px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 900x1130px

>>26361326
>You are a muslim aren't you?

No, I praise Kek

>>26361329
topkek all you normies will just turn this board to /adv/ 2.0 like you've been trying for the past 2 years

>>26361305

it seems to be the normies who do most of the whining these days. they squeal and oink about every aspect of the board, and their asspain, again our will, makes us stronger.
normies, we will digest you. slowly. when you hit a low point, here shall we lie.

>>26361317
fuck /mlp/

i dont think that shouldve ever happend. moot fucked up on that one.

that doesnt mean its allowed to happen again. fuck you.

File: 1427783259975.jpg (206KB, 838x731px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 838x731px

The normies are such a silly bunch.

Who ready?

>>26361385
/mlp/ is a totally different situation, it was about segregating content, not posters. OP keeps saying that there are /mlp/ and /lgbt/ to support his case. But obviously they are in fact not comparable at all to what he wants. He either knows this and continues to be dishonest, or is actually so mind-bogglingly stupid as to believe his own shit.

>>26361340
By "quality control" he means banning anyone he doesn't like. Actually in the namr of quality control, OP is the first one who should be banned from the new board.

>>26361463
think of it as a country club for losers

country clubs have codes of conduct

>>26361497
And what makes you think you get to choose who gets in or not? Create your own site for that.

You will never get your "no girls or nonvirgins allowed" board on 4chan. Weird how you just can't get that through your thick skull.

File: 1444079839692.jpg (36KB, 339x324px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 339x324px

>508 votes in favor
>nice clean simple rules
>new more suiting name

everything is so great. You are all so great.

Good night. Don't let the normies bite.

File: 1452480503825.png (331KB, 1280x768px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1280x768px

>>26361529
>And what makes you think you get to choose who gets in or not? Create your own site for that.
Except it's not him. It's what robots have all agreed upon over time. You normies are dishonest rats that do not belong here, and if you won't leave then we will.

>>26361540
hope youre ready for a big let down

what the fuck is this strawpoll shit supposses to accomplish anyway

its mainly used by fanboys to vote for their favorite ship

>>26361559
>all robots

speak for yourslef, sperglord. i think /r9k/ is a pretty chill and funny place. only dumbasses like you are taking this shit seriously.

File: aboslutelyregularpepe.jpg (400KB, 653x635px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 653x635px

>>26355715
we should allow /weed/ threads

>>26361559
Are you fucking blind? In all of these threads robots have been raging about what to allow and what to ban. There will never be an agreement on what is a "robot".

>>26361373

This has been my main board since it's inception.

I guess your sort never saw the hypocrisy in excluding other people because they're different. You're anti-thetical to the very ideals that first allowed a culture to form on this board. Nobody was excluded.

"Together alone, forever"

and I'll be glad to be rid of this 'normie' bullshit. Impossible to have a conversation with someone who has no imagination or forgiveness. The fact that I still achieved some standing, sexual value, and respect DESPITE being an outcast all my life triggers some people. I'm not alone, either.

Lots of people with one foot rooted firmly in the real world, and one in the abyss.

THAT'S the type of person who originally gravitated to this board. Those are the people I want to talk with. Again. Like I used to.

Like I still do.

Only without shrill faggots screaming at me to leave, when I've been here the whole time. It will be an honest relief.

Not because I hate virgins, either. I lost mine at 25.

>>26361610

>D-DUDE W-WEED LMAO

How bout no

i bet most of you "robots" shitposters

i bet its likely that the prick behind all these cuck, wagekek and race bait threads are you fuckwits, not "normies"

most poeple who post genuine feels threads seem to lead fairly almost normal lives, just down on their luck. but theyre shit becuase they had realationships or a re female and you shitpost post calling them normies or roastie. and now youre playing the victim crying for a safe space.

>>26361679
>achieved some standing, sexual value, and respect
>being an outcast all my life
contradiction

Posting and discussing dogs or cats in positive light or as pets should be classified as normie posting and thus banned.

you guys were the ones who freaked the fuck out when the robot was reinstated

you couldnt shitpost and spam your damn virginal frog shit anymore

>>26361801

Hey, if you say so.

If it's a contradiction, I own it completely and fully.

I don't need to prove shit to anyone. I just want to talk about my frustrations and struggles with the people who are willing to open dialogue without throwing buzzwords around.

I'm looking in your direction too, pol.

>>26361540
>he actually thinks he will get his own board on 4chan

>>26355715
I like /kv/ as a name

>>26355715

How about /cheekynandos/ ?

>>26355715
How about /specialsnowflake/ ?

Women can be robots, just ask the first wave robots. We used to have greentext threads where I really resonated with some female robot greentexts. So this whole idea is based on a retarded and incorrect assumption.

But sure, spam it into oblivion. This is like those retards spamming """"official"""" /r9k/ council threads, making decisions on bans and post deletions and stuff while none of it happens.

>>26363316
Can you imagine if OP or one of his followers would be given mod powers? These are exactly the kind of powertripping people who could never be trusted with anything resembling responsibility.

What's a term that describes someone powertripping but without any actual power and only whines how he should have power? Like OP:

>>26363365

OP has never asked for "power". Only that a board reflecting the true spirit of /r9k2/ be created. This board has become a fusion of /adv/ and /soc/. An entire board is being ruined because people don't realize there's /lgbt/, /soc/ and /adv/.

>>26363413
That's exactly what he is asking for. He wants a board created based purely on what he wants, his own rules, his decisions on who to ban. He isn't asking for a new board to be created because there's a need for it, he's asking it in the hopes to be given it to him and him only.

>>26363487
This. Also he can then post in the board with his tripcode saying "Oh yeah I practically founded this board" like a retarded moot trip.

>>26363533
No kidding. OP would crown himself god emperor of the board if he could. He would tripfag on it like no tomorrow with a messiah complex.

Is OP kill? Or did he give up?