Did Steven Avery do it?

>>26343428
Hoo?

He probably didn't but he's a massive hillbilly trash criminal anyway

Even if he did, the prosecution was fucking awful and everyone involved should lose their jobs. Based on how the trial went down, he should have been given not guilty 100%.

yes, he probably did. a lot of people seem to think the point of the documentary was to prove he is innocent, it's not, the point was to show how fucked up that particular police department is and how reasonable doubt doesn't seem to mean anything in in the court system

The jury was a bunch of backwoods fucks who think "DA COPS ARE GOOD BOYS DEY DINDU NUFFIN"

They could have had a handwritten letter from the sheriff saying he planted evidence and they still would have found Avery guilty.

>>26344294
Uhh...the point of the documentary is to imply that he's innocent.

>>26344435
no, it's not

his own lawyer isn't sure he is guilty or innocent, and that's what they built the entire case off of, reasonable fucking doubt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wlh7DiXgik

>>26343428
(brendan dassay)


yeah

>>26343428

yeah, but the police planted evidence, but there was non blood dna evidence, deserved to be locked up desu

>>26346155
Don't be strange.

>>26343428
>66 inches

manlet