If you are one that welcomes refugees, you are literally the cancer of the world.
I hope it's bait, but I'll reply anyways.
Why? What do you consider so bad about taking in refugees? Is it national pride? The idea that we are superior to everybody else for reasons? Are you afraid of what is different?
To me, it just makes no sense. Many countries in Europe actually need the refugees because they're lacking many workers in specific domains like construction sites or medic assistants, since pretty much none of the local citizen want to fill in those spots. Also, refugees are much more useful/beneficial to a society than homeless or jobless people (purely from a financial point of view; of course NEETs motivate others to participate in this capitalist system).
But yeah, I'd honestly want to understand why refugees are not wanted.
>Murica fucks up their area
>EuCucks sell the arabs and everyone else in that fucking area guns
>Oh no why are so many people running away from their country
>Oh no why are so many shit people hiding themself as refugee since we dont check the borders
I wonder why
Alot propaganda and snewfags believe /pol/ is legit and not just a troll.
I agree that we need to check the borders more since otherwise we would let more shitty people in who are using this refugee problem for shit reasons.
Also, countrys like germany need to stop selling arabs gun[s/spoiler]
>Many countries in Europe actually need the refugees because they're lacking many workers in specific domains like construction sites or medic assistants
except they don't work. they eat welfare and shit rape.
You have been muted for 16 seconds, because your comment was too low in content (0.00% content).
Let's dispel this fiction once and for all that Angela Merkel doesn't know what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing; she's undergoing a systematic effort to change this country and make Germany more like the rest of the islamic world. If I'm elected we'll embrace what makes Germany the greatest country in the world.
the real refugees are in Turkey, the young men bully their way to the front, we should exchange them for women and children and offer provisions to the Turks for the trouble
except that you are generalizing to the point where it's getting ridiculous
you guys are pretending that there has never been any rape in western society prior to the refugee crisis
>germany fucks Europe up in the 1910's
>germany fucks Europe up again in the 1930s-40s
>germany enables the USA to become a superpower
>the USA(which is largely germanic) fucks the middle east up and spreads SJW propaganda to europe
>fallout from the middle east fucks up europe
gas the krauts
5 years ago I could be proud living in my beautiful city.
But now though? If I step outside my apartment building and walk for ONE minute, I would already have passed AT LEAST 2 dirty fucking gypsy subhumans, sitting on the sidewalk begging like the shitstains they are.
EVERY SINGLE subway ride there's bound to be a shitskin walking up to you shaking his fucking penny mug in your face.
All around the city these shitskins can be found repeating the same, and only phrase they know in my language, followed by "PLEASEEE PLEASEEEEEEEEEEE".
I am all for normal immigration, when people come to a country because they are interested in the culture and want to build a life here. But when they come here only because their country is a dying messy shithole and they want to leech off our welfare system? They can fuck right off.
the big majority of people leaves their country because their life there was shit, hoping for a better future elsewhere. what you described to be 'ok' were tourists, who come and visit your country to experience a different culture every now and then
also, you can't expect refugees to be integrated into society that quicky, especially with people like you who prevent the government from making uniform decisions. instead of getting triggered by everything in your way like the faglord you are, you should try to look beyond your little basement room and start actively changing the world into a better place.
>they should piss off
what you don't seem to grasp is that immigrants don't really have any other choice. if they could happily live in their home in syria, they would, but they can't.
A sizeable portion of them are not refugees fleeing from war, but economic migrants moving for money - they could've stopped at any number of countries on their way to Germany/Sweden and would've been safe. They could've gone the other way towards Indonesia/Malaysia and would've been safe. Yet they go to the places with the most generous benefits. Not to mention that countries like Saudi Arabia took absolutely zero.
I have no problem taking actual refugees, as long as they can PROVE that they are actually refugees and not just economic migrants.
There's the crime and terrorism too. If the same kind of people that the refugees are fleeing from follow them, then it defeats the point of seeking refuge entirely. Doesn't matter if the likelihood of a migrant or muslim being a terrorist is 1 in 100 or 1 in a million, it's just not a risk that any sensible country should take.
EU countries have no choice in the matter, though. Instead of imposing any sort of controls, Merkel simply flung the doors wide open to anybody and everybody.
>hoping for a better future elsewhere
exactly what I mean when I said "want to build a life here"
these degenerates lounging on the street for months are not trying, and you can't argue against it
>also, you can't expect refugees to be integrated into society that quicky
this same group of shitskins have been living in their shitty sleeping bags outside the supermarket/subway station close to my home for at least 1.5 years for sure, these fucktards are not even trying.
It's like this everywhere, last week I visited a part of the city that I haven't been to in 6 months, and GUESS WHAT I recognize at least 2 of them sitting in the exact same spots that I saw them at last time.
>if they could happily live in their home in syria, they would, but they can't.
and how is that my fucking problem? they should not be let across the border
we have had extreme shortage of housing for normal citizens for years, and our welfare/economy and support systems are on the verge of falling apart, these fuckers SHOULD NOT be allowed here
>they could've stopped at any number of countries on their way to Germany/Sweden and would've been safe. They could've gone the other way towards Indonesia/Malaysia and would've been safe. Yet they go to the places with the most generous benefits.
This. There's a shit ton of places they can go yet they choose to come here like every other degenerate shitskin
Everything you said is wrong.
Many countries in the EU have housing shortages and rampant unemployment/underemployment. Many have over burdened welfare systems due to their aging populations. Therefore they cannot even afford to house, educate and regularise these refugees not to mention the families they will send for in the near future. Most are not qualified to for skilled/educated labor and would spend years on welfare before they could even begin to pay into the system. Those funds would be better spent on the native population to revitalize the economies. Most are not even refugees from Syria but immigrants from other muslim countries. They are opportunists and no different from illegals who entered the EU in the preceding years.
>What do you consider so bad about taking in refugees? The idea that we are superior to everybody else for reasons?
Western culture is superior. We don't kill people for being gay. We don't say that infidel women and girls can be raped with impunity. We don't violently attack anyone for satirizing religious figures. We don't advocate killing apostates. We don't practice bigamy.
It's simple. More welfare dependent, uneducated laborers = more votes for populist socialists. More workers = depressed wages and inflated housing prices. There are hotels in Germany making a mint by housing immigrants on the State's tab.
>implying you would not try to get into a more economically developped country if you were in their shoes
dying from bullets or dying from hunger makes no big difference. if there's a risk of dying because your country has political or financial issue, you definitrly would want to try and leave, looking for an alternative. and logically, you would chose the best alternative, meaning wealthy european countries.
about the terrorism point you've made, even though germany opened their doors wide open, no islamist terror attack has happened yet, BUT several right wing PEGIDA attacks have happened, and those were caused mostly by highly cultured germans, not those savage immigrants.
>throwing away a banana because there is a 1/10000000 chance that it's expired
have fun with your pleb logic
Normal immigration doesn't occur in such huge numbers. The sheer amount of them ensures that they will end up living in ethnic enclaves which means that they will not integrate into wider society. I'm not even speculating, it's something my family has observed in muslim immigrants for the last two decades even though the rates were much lower and the restrictions were much more stringent.
I contend that they do have other choices. They *the non-syrian majority) are economic migrants who could stay and create businesses or take jobs in their own countries. They could go to other muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Malaysia or Indonesia.
>no islamist terror attack has happened yet
Yeah, the massacres in Paris and the mass rapes in Cologne never happened.
The logic behind it is more like:
>Imagine a bowl of M&M's.
>[whatever percentage of muslims that are incompatible with western society] of them are poisoned!
>Go ahead, eat a handful.
>Not all of those refugees are terrorists.
>But now your boss has forced you to eat the entire bowl. Lucky you!
No, that analogy is bad. You're implying everybody would die if only a couple of terrorists get into the country. At best, they'll do some damage and that's it.
Also, the mass rape doesn't really count as a terroristic attack as it had no political goals.
If you support bombing the countries the refugees come from, you should have no problem providing asylum to these same people. Bombs are in general far more expensive than housing refugees. Then again, we love to be hypocrites here in the west.
Yeah I mean it was *just* rape on a scale not seen since wartimes. It doesn't really matter. Damned fascists only care about it as an excuse to attack Muslims.
I swear to God you people will not see the fist until it's smashed you face in. How many Europeans have to be beaten, raped and killed by them for you to realise that maybe they are a problem? Over a thousand girls were raped and prostituted repeated over a decade in Rotherham alone. Gangrapes are suspiciously surging in migrant quarters of Sweden. What else will it take?
People who support the migrants are fucking hypocrites. They prattle on and on about how we owe it to the Syrians but never say a word about the EU's refusal to accept immigrants from Donetsk.
Of course it did you fucking retard. These "refugees" are an invasion force, raping the women of conquered territories is what invaders have done for centuries. Usually you have to kill the men in the region first, they usually don't roll over like little cucked liberals.
>What do you consider so bad about taking in refugees?
That depends on the refugee.
>The idea that we are superior to everybody else for reasons?
I literally know I am superior to them. They don't know how to fucking read, they don't work, they are sexist, racist, believe in the worst religion, they don't clean anything including themselves, they have rape culture, and they love it.
>Are you afraid of what is different?
No because I live in America where we already have functioning Muslims so it's not their difference, it's their fucking their fucking disgusting behaviors and attitudes.
Except you literally don't. It's one of the reasons you have a house that you keep locked.
Fucking stupid for letting the males in. Should have just let women in.
When you have an imbalance between males and females (specifically more males) there are lots of violence problems.
Let every fucking brown woman in, but shoot every single male at the border.
OK say you have a bowl of M&Ms and start introducing revels. At what percentage does it cease being a bowl of M&Ms? 100%? Irl intrastate conflict starts at around 20%-80% and at 50%-50% both groups have an equal shot of getting full control. People shit on those who are against multiculturalism but the only reason these European countries are taking in these refugees are because they are liberal democracies and kind like that. But say Germany became 30% natives and 70% refugees. Would it still be Germany? Would it be New Syria? This is a way to make new countries. Just look at how Israel took over Palestine.
>To me, it just makes no sense. Many countries in Europe actually need the refugees because they're lacking many workers in specific domains like construction sites or medic assistants, since pretty much none of the local citizen want to fill in those spots.
Horse shit. Refugees are essentially imported NEETs, only they don't even speak the local language and tend to rape childen instead of masturbating to anime. It's like someone rolled up all the negative stereotypes about /r9k/ (misogynist, hates normies, lazy leeches) into real people and let them loose, then gave them free reign to wreck shit because it's politically problematic to admit there's a problem.