>You will never go back to the times where you could slap the shit out of Chad's face with your gauntlet and demand satisfaction, set up a date and time for a duel, prepare your guns, write your last poem and face off against him to defend your honor
Why did cunts lobby to take this vengeance opportunity away from us? Were they losing too many chads in duels with robots?
You can't legally challenge some asshole to a duel anymore and he can't be obligated by honor and not looking like a punk bitch in front of his family, friends and women to agree to it.
You stupid retarded roastie. What the fuck do you think robots did back then? Play computer games? Stupid retarded cunt. Its obvious that robots back then were either artists, drug addicts, or gun nuts. What the fuck was there to do back then? Stupid bitch. Kill yourself. Cumbucket.
>I'm an excellent shot and I've been practicing for years including drawing and shooting
Should have spent that time trying to not be a fucking loser, jesus.
Nobody has yet said what does matter in a duel.
Dueling was a gentleman's thing. Like, regular jackoff farmers didn't duel. If you were some guy in Tennessee back in 1797 and some dipshit at the town general store cast aspersions onto your simple farmer's wife you didn't challenge them to a duel, you just got into brawls and tried to gouge each other eyes out. (seriously, eye gouging was a real problem back in early America, it was for a time the preferred method of settling disputes between drunken roughnecks)
Most duels didn't even end with someone being shot. Most of the time they deliberately missed each other just so they could both say they defended their honor. And more to the point, modern society doesn't have a conception of "honor" like the 18th century did so there's no reason to duel anymore. You know how modern public figures defend their honor? They hire some sleazy lawyer and sue the everloving fuck out of the accuser.
im drunk, but i think it'd be really dope if a movie opened up with a pistol duel. no explanation as to why. and if the main character wins but barely survives.
then the rest of the movie you learn the reasons why. and it flashes back & forth between current & past.
duels wouldn't really work. they stand back to back and count 10 steps and turn around and shoot? who is gonna do that? everybody would cheat not to die.
a battlefield would be better, 2 men enter 1 man leaves.
also they used single shot pistols back in the day. today we have revolvers and semi-automatic pistols which much more killing power.
Literally the only thing that matters is how much you want to kill the other guy. You're assuming your precious chad will perform the perfect motion of aiming right at the opponent's head and drop him with a single shot. Assuming he won't be scared shitless of getting shot himself, of killing another human, incapable of hesitating or fucking missing.
In most duels, the guy who got shot would shoot back and hit the other guy. Both would die, nobody would die, one would die, it could go any of those ways.
>Both would die, nobody would die, one would die, it could go any of those ways.
So it's 50/50, then? Fantastic. I wouldn't feel the need to duel anyone but if people want to shoot each other to death then I don't see a problem with it.
The whole world could be burning but as long as my patch of my land was unaffected, there would be no problem.
It's an amazing novel that pretty much set the stage for Russian literature. The image is just a shitty choice because (SPOILER)
in the novel the protagonist kills his best friend out of arrogance.
There are some translations that change it to prose and/or drop the rhyme scheme that sounds ridiculous sometimes in English.
Chad's power is based on society
Take him to a level where society can't protect him and the battle is on equal grounds
>the author, Alexander Pushkin died in a duel
chad you rapscallion! I challenge thee to a duel
>we are already slaves.
If you want to twist it like that then both men and women are slaves. Men because they slave away at a job and women because they either do the same or slave away at home.
We both know I was talking about slavery in the sense of ownership, though. What's wrong with have a female slave? She'll be more faithful to you than your fucking wife.
>Have you seen spartacus?
Jesus fucking christ
This. At least a slave women would know her place and not give me any trouble or the burden of having to deal with a divorce. This nigger cuck >>26310338 is projecting all his betaness at this point. Enjoy your loss.
Keep telling yourself that. Hurry up or I will have my slave women whip you with a cat of nine tails...(though you probably would get pleasure from that anyways so I might have to reconsider another punishment).
It evens the playing field though. Chad wants to fuck you up but he has to be a good shot (flintlock pistols were very inaccurate keep this in mind). Its a bit of luck and skill required to shoot someone with one of those.
leaving aside your weirdness, the only reason women are valued is because they represent the potential for a lot of motherfuckin dudes. That's all egg scarcity amounts to: women are valuable not for anything in themselves, but because they represent the potential existence of many other outstanding men.
>robots thinking they could beat Chad at anything involving physical attributes like quickness and accuracy
You should be happy modern laws protect you, the weakest and most pathetic members of society
from birth and until death, men serve women. this is an essential truth and robots are depressed because they try to fight this truth.
look at the Supreme Gentleman - he would have been happy if he had in fact been a real gentleman.
Guns are great equalizer in life. It allows physically weaker folks like us to even the battlefield against physically stronger people. They can use guns too but we can become just as skilled in firing a rifle or pistol.
Most people died from infections because the of their filthy nasty ass clothes, one doctor showed up to a duel and stripped naked to avoid this and the other duelist keeled over in laughter and called the whole thing off.
hey! arnold crazy self-defense works irl it seems
they outlawed gun dueling because the shorter men were winning since they are harder to hit due to their smaller stature while taller men were an easy target due to their bigger frames.
ladies were getting pissed at being stuck with all the short men so they made their legislators outlaw gun dueling.
>Guns are great equalizer in life. It allows physically weaker folks like us to even the battlefield against physically stronger people.
Then why are all soldiers physically fit and nothing like the people on this board? I swear, you nerds are so delusional.
Do you know why a beta uprising has never happened? Because the police and the army would just gun you down like animals and the world would be a better place.
>you will never be a genius dying at young age for love
Not true btw.
Soldiers are physically fit because they have to endure harsh environments which require you to jump around, duck and cover etc. The majority of casualties in war are often the result of dehydration, injuries and the like. In self defense, you don't have to do any of that. You just need to be ready and prepared first before the would be attacker.
Most beta uprisings end from being outnumbered and from self inflicted wombs. If it were a one to one fire fight, then the chances of either a beta or cop killing the other is 50/50 depending on the circumstances.
>Then why are all soldiers physically fit and nothing like the people on this board?
Because being a soldier is about more than being a good shot, you have to hike for miles with a shitload of equipment.
There are soldiers who post on r9k though and there was the asian military guy in the SEA teacher thread a week back, and I saw a marine and naval engineer a last night. Most soldiers are high test or southerners with a lifelong history of military service, the thrill and tradition of fighting is a high that can't be avoided.
I miss the war adventurism threads on /k/, rip the japanese merc who fought durkas.
case in point here >>26310691
look at that manlet outshoot that taller and much more handsome male.
gun dueling was setting back humanity's attractive gene pool back by generations so they had to outlaw it.
>Then why are all soldiers physically fit and nothing like the people on this board?
Because they train for war, you won't need to be fit for a duel. You just need to be good at aiming fast. That's it, one repetitive motion and lots of luck involved. fucking roastie
>In self defense, you don't have to do any of that. You just need to be ready and prepared first before the would be attacker.
Okay... so if the first person to attack wins when it comes to a gunfight then the normies would still win because there are far more of them.
found your problem
I don't think the average soldier is a good shot at all. But, if I had to bet on whether a soldier or the average robot would win in a firefight, it would not be a tough decision.
>everyone I disagree with is female and has a certain type of vagina
How stupid do you even have to be.
Not if you outsmart them. See Veitnam War, Middle Eastern Insurgency, etc. Chads can get tired. Also, most Chads wouldn't fuck with an armed robot if his life was on the line. They have too much pride to take such a risk.
Do you even own guns m9?
>Most beta uprisings end from being outnumbered and from self inflicted wombs
Honestly they end early because the people who pull them off all seem to have double digit IQs, it's kind of nice that prepared and diligent people don't regularly try to be mass murders.
Politics, help from foreign powers, and they were willing to die in unseemly fucking numbers zerg rushing. I think the tet offensive ended with something like 40% of their force being shrekt.
>normies would still win because there are far more of them
Most normies are unarmed.
>But, if I had to bet on whether a soldier or the average robot would win in a firefight, it would not be a tough decision.
Well duh, I don't even know how many here even have guns or training but soldiers would arrive with overwhelming force and equipment some poorfag ghetto blaster isn't going to be much use when you get flashbanged and lit up.
A duel would depend on how practiced with weapons the robot is.
>implying any of you would have the balls to duel
You fuckers shit your pants with social interactions I seriously doubt you have the courage to challenge someone to a pistol duel, let alone know how to aim in the first place.
Can't even defend yourself. smdh
You are the most ultimate cuck I had ever had the disadvatage of meeting. I would share my sympathy but why bother. You enjoy getting cucked this hard.
That's because society is no longer honor based, it's a victimhood society. Whoever has the most victim points wins. Challenging someone publicly just puts them on a pedestal now.
Most gun homicide is black on black and involves drugs, you'll have to wish pretty damn hard.
I'd imagine if you were suicidal it'd be a 'might as well' thing.
>it's a victimhood society. Whoever has the most victim points wins
Kind of putting this board on blast t b h, there's even a robot points chart.
>Can't even defend yourself
Americans can't seem to defend themselves either seeing as they're getting killed in their fucking schools or even better, their own homes BY THE POLICE. Yeah, America sounds like a great place. It's so great that most robots are from America. That's not a gigantic warning sign or anything.
>I'd imagine if you were suicidal it'd be a 'might as well' thing.
If you can't off yourself in private I seriously doubt you have the courage to have a showdown with someone else