Assange is Absolutely Fucking Based.
Wish normies would fuck off.
>Only ultraliberal teenagers
Take that sloppy NSA Surveillance Cock out of your throat, you Mong.
>you must be 18+ to post
This just legitimates the inherent morality of Assange's work.
Wikileaks would mercilessly fuck up the entire US surveillance structure if they even dared to start a full out cyberwar.
Assange is already de facto untouchable by the US.
Now he's de jure untouchable.
As in, if the US apprehends or assassinates or "disappears" him, any small shred of legitimacy the US government still might have left is flushed completely down the Shitter.
>we're living in the cyberpunk dystopia
>As in, if the US apprehends or assassinates or "disappears" him, any small shred of legitimacy the US government still might have left is flushed completely down the Shitter.
>implying that's stopped the US before
This isn't about morals it's about power.
>yfw the UN has absolutely no legal authority over any member nation
>The US pays over a quarter of all dues that fund the UN,
>none of their efforts mean dick without US backing
Literally no one cares about the UN
>This isn't about morals it's about power.
>Wikileaks would mercilessly fuck up the entire US surveillance structure if they even dared to start a full out cyberwar.
>he still thinks the UN has any power
except I didn't imply this
refer to >>26302200
I like metal but goddamn this is Coldsteel levels of edgy.
>he thinks the US is the only one who wants assange
Do yourself a favor and look up the Saudi cables. If we really wanted to be dicks we would stick him of a plane to Riyadh. His head would literally be on a platter within days
legitimately curious: What's keeping them from doing this? It's not like it's out of line with US Black Ops policy since the Cold War. You'd think this would have already happened considering how vehemently the Obama administration has been targeting whistleblowers.
Is Wikileaks just too visible? They'd be too difficult for the US to eliminate "discreetly" without causing an international diplomatic rift?
Except those countries don't give a fuck.
It's better than nothing though and at least shuts a few whiny SJW journalists up.
I like you OP
>Is Wikileaks just too visible
That's it. And key prominent figures DO support assange/Wikileaks etc.
e.g. most of BBC are total faggots but there are some prominent establishment journos who do support wikileaks. And famous people. That china artist guy.
I don't really see Assange ever getting his shit unfucked tho which is sad.
most those involved in WL are westerners in Europe etc, most prominent and well known and there would be a shit storm if anything obvious happened to a whole bunch.
of course there WILL be attacks; but more subversive and war of attrition type things. Prime example being Assange, but others include that stuff with the supporter in Iceland, general harassment and propaganda... And of course there was the financial blockade.
plus going after the leakers hard.
I don't know to be honest. I mean with all the refugees coming in and the Paris attacks, now is the perfect time to execute a plan like this.
I wouldn't be surprised if some of the "refugees" are actually US agents.
As with all the shady shit that the US government has done over the last 50 years or so, the possibility definitely isn't beneath them.
cont. Assange obviously made efforts to get visible support of prominent people too. Famous people visiting him like fucking Lady Gaga.
People call him an attention whore but being that is literally keeping him alive.
Reminds me of Operation Gladio tbqh.
Video very related (especially from 21:40 to 33:50)
dubs of truth
gud foresight on assange's part