You're literally retarded if you actually bought the evolution meme.
K, but that pic is wrong mate. The apes you see today are more like distant cousins. We didn't evolve from them. There are no more of the 1st ape that's in your pic.
We don't have millions of the far left. The far left evolved into millions of us, AND millions of apes. Its called a common ancestor retard. If the artist meant that to be a chimp then he also doesn't understand. chimps didn't exist back then.
No, it actually isn't. The entire OP picture is false too.
But, the picture isn't true. Did you faggots sleep through HS biology?
If Americans came from England then why is there still an England?
You can cry 'IQ doesn't matter' all you want, bringing up some sort of magical spiritual sameness of all human beings, but the hard facts are that it underlies pretty much every virtue and creative outlet that has ever been defined as humanity. So yes, Africans literally are subhumans. Unless, again, you prefer to pretend that artistic, scientific, and moral progress somehow doesn't relate to sub- and superhumanity.
Humans are an alien/chimp hybrid obv
First aliums seed a planet with basic DNA
They let it evolve yadda yadda until you get a lifeform that's well adapted to the environment and compatible with humanoid (aka alium) DNA
Then they slowly feed their own DNA into that species until they develop sentience, then once they get societies and shit going they drop the monolith bomb and that species discovers science and shit all in one blow
Point is it's a sophisticated method of reproduction that's geared towards habitability on many different planets
It actually doesn't. When our genes are 99.99-100% similar and you can, at times, find more genetic variation between members of the 'same race', you can basically just markup any differences in society, culture, civilization or whatever else to environment.
Stay mad /pol/faggot.
I have a guess that you haven't done your reading.
Educated and experienced.
>When our genes are 99.99-100% similar and you can, at times, find more genetic variation between members of the 'same race', you can basically just markup any differences in society, culture, civilization or whatever else to environment.
You mean variance?
>a measure of how the data distributes itself about the average
This says nothing about the location of the average, nor its heritability, nor its social external validity.
I actually am both poor and retarded, but the best I could do is not to be deluded regarding its causes, or rather, cause. For instance, I now know better than to try to reproduce and propagate my retard, criminal, violent genes.
Sorry, was meant for this idiot >>26296209
You're a fucktard man.
>it's a "evolution isn't real" episode
No, it's true, it's just intelligence determines wealth, not the other way round. Why do you think we have retards winning lotteries and squandering it all? Or, if you're going to say environment either way, just get a rich family to adopt an average kid (double-blindly ideally) and watch it fail academically compared to his 'siblings'.
>Turkheimer and colleagues (2003) argued that the proportions of IQ variance attributable to genes and environment vary with socioeconomic status. They found that in a study on seven-year-old twins, in impoverished families, 60% of the variance in early childhood IQ was accounted for by the shared family environment, and the contribution of genes is close to zero; in affluent families, the result is almost exactly the reverse.
There are millions of studies that prove the same thing, enviorment is just as important as genes.
Only if you take all your scientific data from people living in the based 1800's, as you should.
I can't believe people actually believe in the "germ theory" myth too. You people ACTUALLY believe that there are tiny creatures everywhere that we can't see? And they make us SICK? lmao
BRB, need to get leeched to balance my humours.
This type of thinking is why you'll always be poor; you think that your fate is determined from birth.
>you think that your fate is determined from birth
Never takes too long for environmentalists to move to ad homs of defeatism when faced with facts. 'You might be right, but you're only right because you want to be miserable and have excuses not to try to fix your life!' Embarrassing.
>"A nationwide study found that people of below average intelligence were, overall, just about as wealthy as those in similar circumstances but with higher scores on an IQ test."
Also, that 'study' of yours is literally anecdotal exceptions and 'there is a relationship, but it isn't THAT big'. It has nothing to do with science, it's just bad journalism, 'my buddy is smart af and he's a loser'-tier.
>We can find tons of dinosaur bones but literally none of "transitional" species.
>inb4 fakes or inconclusive
Your pic is kind of misleading. Our common ancestor we share with chimps is long since extinct. The modern chimp is as far away from our common ancestor as we are.
Also most species go extinct, this is just a fact of life, it's no surprise that our ancestral cousins aren't around anymore, modern man has only been around for a short time, and we're probably closer to extinction ourselves than we think.
not pissing into your own mouth
How do you guys think we're going to level up from Homo Sapiens Sapiens to whatever we're going to be if the earth is still spinning
Seriously, are we going to have wings or superpowers in the far future?
Thought I'd make an accurate representation of what these liberals believe in.
Depends. If there's a tech+social breakthrough where some sort of directed evolution becomes possible AND accepted then we're good.
If not, then we'll never leave this planet. We'll become that caramel-coloured mess of hyper-aggressive creature.
I can tell you that you won't look exactly like this, but it gives you all a good idea.
>Natural selection has stopped
That's literally impossible. If for whatever reason a law were passed that, for instance, only retarded or disabled people were to reproduce, that would still be natural selection. 'Natural' in 'natural selection' doesn't imply some sort of objective desirability, much less that the pressures in question can't be man-made.
What about this guy?
I'd say an evolutionary biologist qualifies as a scientist.
>so where are the millions of these inbetween species
most of them lurk /r9k/
I like how uneducated virgin fucks here actually think they are smarter than actual real life scientists.
This is just so fucking funny, all these fedora tier arguments and mspaint picture, pretending any of you know what they are talking about.