WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEE
HUH HUH HUH, WAKE UP WAAAAAGIIIIIIEEEE
ARE YOU CWYING? ARE YOU GONNA CWY? HUH HUH HUHHUHUH! FEE FI FO FUM I SMELL THE TEARS OF WAGIE SCUM
THIS IS YOUR JOB NOW WAGIE
>>26271365
As a macrophile, i'm okay with this.
>>26271395
isn't that just vore? I have a question for vorefriends actually, do you get off at the thought of being alive in a girls stomach being digested or being actually eaten and chewed
>>26271533
I'm into most giantess stuff, I usually prefer soft vore which is basically vore without getting chewed.
For me atleast It's less about the act, and more about the power-play, some qt having said power over you.
Seems to be common in people who are larger in RL e.g I'm like 6'4 and quite well built.
The fate of all wagies.
>>26271313
Thisshades their day.
Get back to work wagecucks or suffer the punishment.
>>26271313
Arbeit macht frei neet jude
A wagie about to get flattened by a welfare queen, who has grown vast and fat upon the fruits of his wage-slave labour.
>>26271533
There are different variations.
For example, I'm into vore as a secondary thing to giantess. Only within the fetish. It fits well into giantess shit because it's like, a primally, obviously violent act that is basic to human existence (eating another being), but subverted by the fetish so that another human being is the victim. That's a dynamic that giantess fetish is just ideally suited to, a lot of stuff in the fetish is like that. So it makes perfect sense to me for it to be realistic - hard vore, chewing, painful horrific death.
BUT I have noticed that people who are primarily vorefags and secondarily giantessfags tend to be the other way around completely. For them, giantess is the vehicle to get at their core fetish, vore. And they seem, for the most part, to like "soft vore," where the person is swallowed and usually survives in the stomach. Also they tend to like more "cartoon-y" vore, where the smaller person is unswallowably large but gets eaten anyway, which would violate my own preference for realism. Vorefags tend to like more throat cross-sectionals, more focus on depiction of the "squishy insides" of the girl, more focus on the girl burping with satisfaction (common), and the dominance of her disallowing the person out of her stomach. Whereas for me all this stuff seems too on-the-nose vore-y, so I prefer total realism - girls don't often burp or rub their stomachs exaggeratedly, so it puts me off.
tldr: Two major subsets of vore fetishists. Giantess-with-vore and vore-with-giantess. The latter seems to extend tropes from non-giantess vore into giantess, as a general rule. They are more into encompassment, more into vore subtleties (like "being inside someone" as a mixture of comfiness + submission?). Whereas I think guys like me are more into it just as a symbol of extreme dominance and occasionally brutality, e.g. a cute girl biting someone's head off is cruel, humiliating, and horrible, therefore hot.
I have autism.
>>26272599
Are you one of the anons from the habbo hotel meetup thread a few months back? I remember there was a big group of people who were really into giantess porn that were explaining it. If it's not you my bad
>>26272656
Nah I am just a giantess fetishist who had too much coffee and I've thought about this before, so I wanted to type 850,000 words about it.
Giantess people can be pretty bad about this kind of thing though. Size generals are filled with overanalyzing autistic people.
>>26271533
Vorefriend here, I don't enjoy the thought of myself being inside a stomach and digested, just of somebody/something in general, though there are some people who get off to it with themselves as the victim.
keep working wagecucks or your city is gone.
>>26271313
Funniest smug NEET pepe yet!
>>26271313
This is a truly innovative wageslave thread
And for that, I applaud you
>>26271365
o-ok
this thread is making me want to be a wageslave