I actually took a bernie transcript of one of his speeches and replaced everything to do with rich people with the word jews. Tell me it doesn't read like a hitler speech. He's practically calling out kikes but just using different names
I don't know of any Hillary supporters and I silently stalk all of my old classmates on FB. Even my liberal parents say she's the worst possible candidate but the only major downside I know about is the email scandal which seems pretty minor. My parents don't even know about feminism yet so I would doubt they're worried about why other people would support her.
>>26268550 David's parents made sat him down and made him study, and helped him through it.
Jimmy's single mother got drunk and then beat him and threw him out of the house for the night.
Now if you want to talk about fairness I would say that their drastic difference in environment is the epitome of unfair. The meme uses a ridiculous example to unbalance the whole scenario and make it seem clever. As it stands, inequality is not fair.
>>26268488 The sad part is, it really IS sort of minor - considering that plenty of people from both parties do it blatantly and flagrantly as you please every single solitary day. In America, you are completely above the law so long as you have enough money and the right connections.
So email scandal is the only big scar against Hillary? Any other reasons?
Could somebody explain why the email scandal is so bad? I want to know why people think future president is more crucial than the CIA director who actually had his email hacked. Public figures don't even get to know about the lizardpeople but CIA director does.
>>26268550 This is a false equivalence in all honesty. The majority of wealthy people have never worked hard a day in their life. They've received it because it's been in the family. One person who js now dead worked hard and now they all get to be rich. Examples: The Walmart people, The Rockefellers, etc.
I'm not even a leftist but that image is retarded. In real life it's more like >hey, my dad got an A on this test, so I'll just bring it in to show you instead of taking the test myself.
I guess my only problem is that operating a private email server sounds like something I would do. Online privacy is probably more important to me than any other issue because it's the only one that affects my current state of affairs. What are the other federal laws she's broken? Obama smoked pot and I cheered about it.
Seriously not trying to argue. I'm not enthusiastic about politics so /r9k/ basically gets to choose my vote.
>>26268622 >all poorly performing schoolchildren are abused
You're being silly. What you talked about could at most account for a very small percentage of all the F:s in the country. In reality, it can mostly be explained by differences in intelligence and study habits. Very little moral justification for redistribution of anything; just as in real life.
nothing is stopping you from learning a trade and starting a small business dude, calm down. you can not be a complete failure if you want to. you don't have to have a six figure salary to have everything you want. also stop posting the reddit frog
Very possibly, if I felt I needed to make moves behind the scenes. I'd make a bad president though. This particular thread won't apply to me much anyways because I believe in shadow puppet governments and talking heads rather than the stone-serious politics /pol/ represents. Should I let /x/ decide my vote instead?
Or is the issue that she's an actual idiot? Did she really compromise potentially damaging state secrets? I only ask because its hard to google for straight information. If she's an internet illiterate idiot then that would sway me.
>>26268761 I think you're majorly downplaying the effects of environment. It really doesn't come down to potential. You can look at any sets of statistics on the matter and see that children with a more comfortable background will outperform children from stress and poverty almost every time.
It's not a justification for some kind of marxist redistribution of wealth but it's definitely a justification of a look into instating comprehensive social mobility programs.
>>26268550 This is horribly false equivalency meme.
It's more like Jimmy and David both have unequal access to the resources needed to study for the test. David also gets more time with the resources necessary. For the sake of the argument, let's just say David is given more access to the study resources because his parents are rich. What Sanders actually want is for Jimmy and David to both have equal access to the resources needed to pass the test, instead of one person having a more distinct advantage over the other for some arbitrary reason.
Now, how Sanders actually plans on accomplishing this with our economy and healthy system is beyond me, especially when working with an entirely Republican house.
>>26268708 As someone who is standing to inherent ~20 million dollars, you're a complete ungrateful ass. This isn't about "POOR PEOPLE WHO HATE US RICH KIDS WHO TOTALLY DESERVE IT!" This is about the people with the ability to be able to pay into the system to alleviate the burden of the poor and boost the economy.
>>26267839 She accepts money from oil companies, Wall Street, for-profit prisons, etc and then goes on to say about how all those things are evil and should be regulated
she doesn't oppose or support anything until it becomes widely acceptable. for example she didn't support gay rights until 2013. she was an early supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline, then changed her mind once public opinion changed.
she was also secretary of state, forced the government in Libya to step down which resulted in anarchy to this day.
also if you read her emails she literally has no idea what the fuck she is doing. all of her emails are either "how does the fax machine work?" or she's asking former secretaries on how she's supposed to do her job.
>>26267839 she's like the queen of money in politics, just look at her squirm when asked to release transcripts of the speeches she took huge amounts of money to give to goldman sachs, for a recent example
she dodges issues and frames bernie in an obviously deceptive light constantly, god, she's such a slimy bitch
I hate them both Bernie is an economically illiterate idiot who only authored 3 bills despite spending 25 years in the senate. 2 of those bills were about naming post offices. He's done literally nothing. He preys on dumb college kids who don't know any better.
Hillary was the worst secretary of state in recent history, you can't name one positive thing she did. She's bought out by big interests and probably broke the law.
Bernie. Followed by Trump. However I'm not from Burgerland so I'm viewing this from an outsider perspective.
Anti-status quo is the name of the game here. I'd put Bernie first because i actually want to see him fix the country in a proper manner and he speaks the same language as me on the issues i care about.
Trump because he will FUCK SHIT UP. I agree with him on his anti-PC and SJW stances but if his plans for the country turn the place for good or bad i have no fucking idea whatsoever, but if i couldn't get Bernie into the big chair then i'd place Trump in just to see what he would do. I hope he does some good of course but if he makes everything worse then i hope that will cause some sort of uprising or catalyst for the future.
Anyone but Hillary. Just anyone but fucking Hillary. Bought-and-paid-for shill candidate of corporate overlords from the same fucking shitshow that has driven the USA to be the economically lopsided and belligerent fuckup it is today.
Best combo would be Bernie as POTUS and (seeing that the house is all Republicans and Hillary is a shill) taps Trump for VP to help with the Republicans. That would be the greatest.
>jimmie and david do a teamwork >jimmie does 100% of the work but david is the one that has the materials >because david is the one that has the materials he gets an A and jimmie gets an F >jimmie says that is unfair but david mocks him saying he just jealous and wants free stuff
>>26268761 Speaking as a teacher, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Most students who fail come from difficult backgrounds. We have systems in school where we can look up all kinds of personal information on our kids (god knows why, shit's really invasive) and pretty much whenever I look up a troublesome kid to file a detention for them, they're in care, from a very poor background, or there's a risk assessment file in place for run-ins with their parents.
So many ignorant asses on /r9k/ who think they're got some kind of doctorate in sociology.
>do isidewith after some /pol/ time >pick pretty conservative when it comes to mudslimes and the like, more liberal on enviroment and stuff >results >82% Hillary Clinton >... >80% Donald Trump >72% Bernie Sanders Is Shillary paying and getting money from and to everyone?
Thread replies: 102 Thread images: 18
Thread DB ID: 486569
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.