>>26141274 Rape will save us, seriously, the only time society started giving half a fuck about muslims destroying western civilization is when they plunged their micropenii into some unwilling roasty gash, 150 dead in Paris, NOTHING, dead cartoonists, NOTHING, defiled roastie poon and the tide turns.
>if she wears certain clothes I have the god given right to sexually attack her in public
too bad that's not how it works, huh OP. plus it's too late m8. girls are only going to continue to wear skimpier and skimpier clothes in public because it's the era of the liberated SJW feminist cunt who can dress in only a floss bikini and say youre oppressing her if you glance at any part of her body
and considering men are getting locked up because a girl screams rape, when he literally never touched the bitch, well, that's when you know it's all ogre, like it was for this poor bastard: >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11905639/Teenager-falsely-accused-of-rape-commits-suicide.html
men continue to be disposable, women continue to reap all the benefits, betas continue to be frustrated with blue balls seeing hot sluts in public, Chad continues to pound their pussies, wagecucks live another day and make another dollar, neets eat their tendies and i continue to shitpost on this laotian fish tank enthusiast board
>>26142297 You can't choose not to be autistic, but you can choose which phone to buy and what cloths to wear. Your choices should hinge on which neighborhoods you visit and how much you can afford to lose. Pretending you live in a perfect fantasy world and charging others with your personal safety is just irresponsible and childish.
>>26142525 >charging others with your personal safety no one is doing that. no one is saying if you see a woman being assaulted you're forced to help her despite risk to you or something like that. what they are saying is that you don't get a free pass on rape or theft just because you you can't see a woman in short shorts without cumming in your pants or you can't see an expensive phone without being stealing it. no one is saying it's a fantasy world where rape and theft don't happen. doesn't mean it shouldn't be punished or that the victim deserved it.
>>26142659 >or that the victim deserved it. Stop right there criminal scum. Some victims deserve it. Like that bitch in south africa who was showering with some loser before he 'raped' her and she didn't call the cops instead she tweeted or ig-ed the whole thing like the retarded attention whore she is.
When you take excessive steps to put yourself in danger people will always have less sympathy for you.
>>26142659 Saying the victims deserve it is not equivalent to saying rapists and thieves should go unpunished. This is one of the few places on the internet that is actually against importing thousands of these criminals into our country. =
>>26142578 And to add to this the whole slutwalk thing happened after the cops, who also tell people not to be retarded with large sums of cash, told bitches that dressing like skanks might get you molested by pervs. Oh the horror, oh the humanity.
>>26142774 that's not a case of deserving it. it's a case of it being questionable whether she was actually raped or not. if she was raped, then she did not deserve it regardless of the fact that she's retarded and the guy is still a scum bag. a woman given you blue balls is not a valid excuse for raping her.
>>26142936 >if she was raped, then she did not deserve it regardless of the fact that she's retarded and the guy is still a scum bag He's still a scumbag. She still DESERVED it. Play with fire and you get burned 'hurr durr we shower naked as friends, hurr durr i don't need to call the cops'. Why shouldn't people deserve to suffer for their flippant and egregious behavior? Should we all be free to act poorly with zero consequence? >a woman given you blue balls is not a valid excuse for raping her. So what? You having more money than someone isn't a valid excuse for being robbed but if you walk through some slum waving around wads of cash NO ONE WILL CARE when you get robbed.
>>26142799 >Saying the victims deserve it is not equivalent to saying rapists and thieves should go unpunished yes it is. well, almost. if he was just giving her what she deserved then why would he be punished? or even if you do punish him, since she deserved it, it be a lighter sentence? raping a woman wearing skimpy clothes is just as bad as raping a woman in normal unrevealing clothes. you're still an animal who can't control his urges.
>>26143031 >if he was just giving her what she deserved then why would he be punished Because he might hurt innocent people in the future. >raping a woman wearing skimpy clothes is just as bad as raping a woman in normal unrevealing clothes There are degrees to murder, there are degrees to rape.
>>26143071 >he can't be a scumbag if she deserved it... Why not? If a child molester was murdered by a serial killer he'd still deserve it and the serial killer would still be a scumbag. >define what it means for someone to deserve something Knowingly engage in risky behavior, the level of 'deserving it' depends on the severity of actions.
>>26143079 >>26143254 actually there's not much variation legally in rape specially compared to murder. just statutory vs otherwise as far as i'm aware. even with murder it's only things like whether it was an accident or whether you planned it. none of those have anything to do with whether the victim deserved it. if the victim was a saint or he was a serial dog rapist the sentence would be the same. just like, if convicted, the rapist of a whore will get the same sentence of the rapist of a nun, all else being equal. >Because he might hurt innocent people in the future. no. if she truly deserved it his actions are only indicative of someone who gives people what they deserve. the doctors in death row aren't punished are they? > it doesn't mean the lion will be celebrated as a hero not as a hero, but some people would be glad it happened. it also means the population won't want to go out and massacre a bunch of lions as sometimes happens when lions attack unprovoked.
>>26143118 >Knowingly engage in risky behavior, the level of 'deserving it' depends on the severity of actions. defining it this way (as a whole scale) is meaningless because then pretty much anyone can be said to deserve it. for example if i blow in someone's face and he kills me i could be said to deserve it by your definition because i did something to annoy him. the way the word is generally used is as defining a point (or section) of a scale of fault where the consequence is expected, not just that it's possible. for example, if I hold my hand on a hot stove I would expect it to burn me and would be surprised if it didn't. Meanwhile, if a woman is just flirting around with a man or is even having sex with him at no point is it generally thought that she loses her right to change her mind. therefore even showering with the guy you shouldn't expect him to rape you and therefore don't deserve it.
>>26143453 >the rapist of a whore will get the same sentence of the rapist of a nun, all else being equal. yes, that's the point. The rapist gets punished without regard to his reasoning, so what's your problem? All we're doing is mocking the victims.
>it also means the population won't want to go out and massacre a bunch of lions as sometimes happens when lions attack unprovoked. lol, that's doubtful. But are you saying we should have witchhunts and arrest hundreds of potential rapists (aka any man above 13 yrs) every time someone is raped?
>>26143453 >the doctors in death row aren't punished are they? They're administering punishment FOR actions committed by the actor, not acting as a punishment BECAUSE of actions committed by the actor. >you tried to touch the hot stove so i'm spanking you vs >you touched the hot stove and got burned
>even with murder it's only things like whether it was an accident or whether you planned it. none of those have anything to do with whether the victim deserved it Nonsense, when you're in court everything will be put into carefully crafted context or narrative that will directly influence the severity of the punishment doled out by your peers. The guy who killed his sons rapist in broad daylight got a couple of years probation with no jail time, that's pre-meditated murder caught on live television mind you, context matters greatly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Plauche https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PUE8fYxjq8
>if the victim was a saint or he was a serial dog rapist the sentence would be the same See gary plauche above. >>26143621 >defining it this way (as a whole scale) is meaningless because then pretty much anyone can be said to deserve it. for example if i blow in someone's face and he kills me i could be said to deserve it by your definition I'd weigh the severity of your actions to the severity of his response, if you died by accident because he punched you and you hit the ground and suffered a fatal head injury I'd be less inclined to convict him especially if the punch was an immediate reflex response. If he went to his truck and got his gun to shoot you up I'd convict him without a second thought.
In either case I'd say you contributed to your fate by pissing off random people, but I wouldn't totally blame you for their response given it's not that big of a deal.
>or is even having sex with him at no point is it generally thought that she loses her right to change her mind. HA HA HA HA, NO.
>>26143718 >I train to get girls to fuck with me beta as fuck and stupid as fuck. if Arnold was training to get women he'd just go ottermode as it's far superior to bodybuilder mode at attracting women. no, Arnold did that because when people asked him what he wanted to be when he grew up he said "a God". the man left humanity behind, don't you dare say he was just trying to get some poon. meanwhile an ottermode twink in short shorts with no shirt on would clearly be looking for a nice bear to top him. so standards are the same.
Women say they don't want to be objectified or stared at or be a sexual object or whatever. That is what they say. But they also say that they should be able to dress like sluts. No one should be looking at them even though they are dressing provocatively to get attention.
It isn't that they don't want attention. They don't want it from you. They want it from Chad. I remember at a party this Chad walked up to a girl and pulled the drawstring on her sweatpants to untie it. She was so upset that she rode his cock and took a face full of his cum. She was sexually assaulted and her response was to have sex with the guy. If any robot accidentally came into contact with that slut she would go straight to the cops.
>>26143833 >so what's your problem? problem is you saying one deserved it and the other didn't. if one deserved it her offender shouldn't be punished. >But are you saying we should have witchhunts.. wow that's a non-sequitur if i've ever seen one... i was just saying since people think the poacher deserved it they don't try to punish the lion, which in african communities just happens to be killing dozens of random lions. >>26143834 first of all, try actually reading. you have a problem of taking an argument and applying it to something else a la strawman. >They're administering punishment FOR... like here. the doctor thing was to counter the point that the rapist is punished if he rapes someone who deserves it because he's likely to do harm to anyone else. My point was that it only means he's more likely to rape someone who deserves it and not the general population. just as a doctor who kills someone in death row isn't significantly more likely to murder an innocent person. >you touched the hot stove and got burned and this was from a separate point altogether. it was to point out why "deserving" is a section of a scale not the whole thing. pay attention, this isn't even fun if you're too stupid to understand why you're wrong. >See gary plauche above. the punishment for murder thing was an aside to point out how little variation there is to rape legally. you do understand gary plauche getting a lighter sentence because his victim deserved it supports MY point right? regardless, gary actually got a lighter sentence because he made a plea deal. the case was weak because a psychologist evaluated that he was unable to determine right from wrong at that instance similar to a temporary insanity plea. took literally 3 minutes to find that out. at least try >I'd say you contributed to your fate but you wouldn't say i deserved it right? again, supporting that "deserve" is a point rather than a the whole scale. >HA NO are you seriously implying she can't ask you to stop?
Say there was an anon who was pulled into conversation at party his normalfag roommates were throwing. Anon, who was, is, and ever shall be khv, was asked to described girls he likes or finds attractive. Anon told to use examples of girls in room he finds attractive. Anon does. Norms laugh, but anon continues.
Anon is later taken aside by RA due to complaint of sexual harassment. A girl reported that I made unsolicited sexual advances toward her. Saying she was attractive is sexual harassment. She felt unsafe around me.
My roommate fucked her. He assfucked her against her wishes. He also was joined by roommate 2 in a spit roasting of this girl. They recorded it kind of secretly because she said no video so they pretended to turn off cam.
It is all about confidence though. Just need to do the confidance and you will be swimming in pussy.
>>26144405 >if one deserved it her offender shouldn't be punished. why is this so hard for you to understand?
if someone blindly walks into the road, they deserve to get hit. If an oncoming car sees the pedestrian acting irresponsibly, and decides run them down out of spite, the driver is 100% guilty. There's not a good guy and bad guy in every story.
>>26144653 >why is this so hard for you to understand? because you're wrong and incapable of arguing your position. >they deserve to get hit no, they don't. > and decides run them down out of spite, the driver is 100% guilty because the victim didn't deserve it...
failing to look both ways does not mean you deserve to be severely injured or killed. that's just ridiculous. given this statement and your previous one about a woman not being able to change her mind, something is seriously wrong with your morality. the only way what you say makes sense is if you use deserve as having any fault whatsoever, no matter how minor. i've already explained why that usage is wrong and you've made no counter argument but if that's how you're using it then there's really no point in the argument.
>>26144405 >My point was that it only means he's more likely to rape someone who deserves it and not the general population Gay plauche is unlikely to re-offend, molesters who feel up skanky retards at the puerto rican day parade are still a danger to others. It's case by case. I think you're hung up on 'deserving it', I put it in quotes for a reason. > it was to point out why "deserving" is a section of a scale not the whole thing. pay attention, this isn't even fun if you're too stupid to understand why you're wrong. Why sperg out on me retard? I put it in quotes I'm obviously not using it normally, the only solid case I used of a bitch who deserved it was the south african retard who tweeted her rape and showered with the dude like a god damn idiot (might I add she's there as an anti-rape activist). >you do understand gary plauche getting a lighter sentence because his victim deserved it supports MY point right I said there were degrees of rape and I said the rapist wasn't guilt free, I don't care about all murders/rapes equally, that's the point. >similar to a temporary insanity plea. Insanity cases have longer sentences not shorter, there's no reason to offer him a lighter sentence unless you thought the jury wasn't going to care or the system didn't actually care themselves. >but you wouldn't say i deserved it right? again, supporting that "deserve" is a point rather than a the whole scale. Nigger I know that because I'm not an autistic retard like you are, look at my first post where I talk about 'deserving it' >>26143118 it's in quotes for a reason.
I think the bitch in south africa straight up deserved to get raped though.
>are you seriously implying she can't ask you to stop? So he raped you? Yes after we were having sex I wanted to stop and he kept going. Any bruises or injury? Evidence of assault? No, but I super told him to stop. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, NO.
I agree with you but I would still let her know that she should use better judgement. Yes, you should be able to wear what you want without being raped but you should face up to reality that some people are evil. It would be like if I drove my fancy care into a bad neighborhood and somebody stole it. You would probably tell me that I'm a fucking idiot for doing that. Doesn't mean that I'm guilty of anything but I should just use common sense.
Thread replies: 67 Thread images: 13
Thread DB ID: 479041
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.