Insecam

>all fun cams are ded
>no one will share links because the normies will overload them
>fucking normies again

It's not just Japan. It looks like Insecam is cracking down hard.

>>26100033
Can confirm. Literally saw a living room cam taken off in front of my very eyes

>>26100114
US lost about 1000. Of course it's likely caused by the publicity in Japan, Insecam is just covering their bases now.

If we want to revive these threads more people have to search manually.

Does "connection interrupted" mean too many viewers or something else?

>>26101330
Others I get "rejected" error.

>tfw watching ghosts live on camera
http://www.insecam.org/en/view/258508/

R.I.P. Insecam
2016-2016. Was fun while it lasted.

http://insecam.org/en/view/167213/

Can someone explain what is going on here?

Swedish Sheep

http://www.insecam.org/en/view/269779/

fuckin normies they always find something to ruin our fun

>>26099894
Why put a camera in bedroom? Is he stupid?

>>26100114
Why? Is npt the target to share insecure cam instead of cutting them off?

>>26103339
you just know it was one of the redditors who come to /r9k/ who narc'd

File: Capture.jpg (72KB, 900x504px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 900x504px

>>26099956
>all fun cams are ded
actually there's still some nice ones out there, look carefully

>no one will share links
Because autists with 70 iq's keep doing idiot(or child)-tier pranks like putting their favorite reddit memes in the camera overlay, playing sounds / flashing lights to alert people, changing the camera's password (what's the point?), etc

>>26103726
post link to this one? the coffe shop?

Any aussies on?

>http://insecam.org/en/view/267436/

>ASIO INTERCEPT 9937
Spooky

last attempt bump.

rip these threads. fuck normies forever

>>26101762
It has happened before in earlier years. Just have to wait for the publicity to die down again and the fun cams to build up without faggots spamming it in the main stream.

As long as cheap ass cameras with horrible security are being sold, the cams will live on.

>>26103437
because it made it to the front page of /r/4chan multiple times
fucking idiots

http://insecam.org/en/view/237404/
>murica

>>26099894
wew
http://insecam.org/en/view/217899/

does anyone remember a couple of years ago when the insecam hype was first around that they didn't link to the actual cameras?
it the cam images seemed to be downloaded directly onto insecams servers, which was good for maintaining camera bandwidth.