Who /sanders/ here?

>>25956878
>Who /retarded/ here?
I fixed your post

reporting in

Hillary campaign workers currently on suicide watch

>>25956899
I watched both republican and democratic debates and he was the only one who was actually answering fucking questions and not just pandering to the audience and stalling for time

>>25956878
>posting a picture of stirner while supporting a socialist

Average illiterate reddit liberal

>>25956899
This is not a trump thread tho

>>25956927
>isnt pandering
>offers to make everything "free"
His whole campaign is pandering and a power grab

File: image.jpg (54KB, 501x525px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 501x525px

>>25956927
>>25956878
>DUDE FREE WEED

take back your Max frog.

>>25956927
don't worry anon some people's parents watched channel 5 instead of channel 7 so they believe the opposite direction of you.

>>25956937
>>25956958
It was the only picture I had.

Reminder that everyone who opposes Sanders is a cuck for the rich.

They just love the upper class taking a bigger and bigger share of the wealth. Economic cucks.

>>25956984
>Sanders wants to increase income taxes on everyone by a minimum of 9%
>Trump doesnt want to tax anyone making under 25,000
How exactly is the socialist rat looking out for the poor?

>>25956984
I'm a trust fund kid :)

America: A nation founded on the concept of "fuck taxes" that is now defunct because the only ones paying taxes are the middle class.

I literally only support him because I want to get bux.

File: 1453233051592.png (111KB, 438x193px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 438x193px

Lol supporting sanders. Its working* for Norway and Sweden, right?

File: 960x0.jpg (163KB, 960x1235px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 960x1235px

>>25956984
I own a business, I don't get cucked by anyone except the IRS.

Sanders wants everyone to be cucked for minorities and single mothers.

>>25957013
>Sanders wants to increase income taxes on everyone by a minimum of 9%
>9% of $0 is $0
Oh man, that was a close one.

>>25957122
If you refuse to work you deserve nothing.

Me. Gimme dat free shit. I like free shit.

>>25957149
>yum yum thank you for shitting in my mouth glorious job creator
>get back to work!
>yessir

>>25957138
>refuse to work
>Implying anyone wants to hire me
lol

File: 1451022090894.jpg (23KB, 500x312px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x312px

>>25957194
I bet you tried pretty hard to get a job

File: sanders3.jpg (34KB, 577x374px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 577x374px

I am not a fan of his socialism but at least sanders is redpilled on women.

>>25956899
you'd have to be retarded to vote cuckservative if you're not a billionaire CEO

>>25957013
Oh my God, now I can't buy as much beer and video games in exchange for somebody bright getting the opportunity to go to school.

FUCKING COMMIES WILL RUIN THE WORLD

>>25957138
>If you refuse to work you deserve nothing.

then wouldn't you say everybody is entitled to employment?

haha, see, Bernie would too

>>25957365
And that free degree will be absolutely worthless.
The other guy who payed for private school will have the job.
All it will do is make everyone poorer and make another unneeded hurdle before you can join the workforce.

>>25957395
>All it will do is make everyone poorer
Good. I'd rather we all become NEET-wageslave hybrids than be stuck as a NEET watching everyone around me succeed.

It seems the worst candidates ever are running this election cycle, from asinine billionaire naricists to dweeby brats trying to act tough (Jeb) to creepy evangelical fundamentalists (Carson, Cruz) to Hillary fucking Clinton.

I like sanders if only because of how much butt hurt he gives rich people, and rich Americans are the biggest assholes on the planet.

>>25957378
no, I don't think even the most milquetoast, moderate conservative would say that you're entitled to a job.

>>25957395
Your degrees are already worthless (well, not yours since I happen to know you're a blue collar wageslave).

There's not a job you can get that doesn't either require serious experience or nepotism. And with that we're still told that the USA has a shortage of skilled labor. That's why companies are importing programmers from India and Russia to work high skill jobs. At the same time, jobs like yours are being given to Latinos who will gladly work for less than a living wage to escape the humanitarian crisis conditions of their home countries.

When it comes down to it, unchecked capitalism is completely built on suffering and exploitation, and the people you want to vote for want to bring you closer to that.

>>25957438
Basically this.
You have been le muted

File: 12115427_920760951337686_8045673283864748965_n.jpg (58KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 720x576px

Who else here /pol9k/?

>>25957470
How about we kick out the illegals and bring business back here instead of bringing in more and killing all the jobs off for dem programs?

>tfw pretty socially liberal
>tfw despise shillary cunton and her lying deceitful bullshit
>like bernie at least a little more, but theres no way this country will be able to successfully implement his socialist utopia ideals like they can in europe, not with the entire midwest and south existing

Call me crazy, but I actually like Martin O'Malley and hen John Kasich for the Republicans the most.

Why does Martin O'Malley not get any recognition? The dude is so based

>>25957194
Yeah, I'm sure you've been rejected from every McDonalds and Starbucks in a 20-mile radius that you applied to in person.

Lazy sack of shit.

>>25957625
>tfw didn't even try getting a job
>online app only
>didn't talk to anybody
>got hired anyway
>$13/hr for menial labor
>tfw still support Bernie Sanders because he's the only non-cuckslave candidate in the running

>>25957616
>Why does Martin O'Malley not get any recognition?
Because the Wire is a historical account of Baltimore while he was mayor.

File: whystumpthetrump.png (434KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 600x600px

>>25956878
>voting for BigBlackBullBernie

Literally why tho

>>25957616
He ruined the state of maryland.
He's extremely incompetent.
He fucked up so hard Maryland elected a republican just to get rid of him and his people.

Kasich is a good guy, but he's not ready to be president yet.

File: sanders-warren-2016-button.jpg (24KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 300x300px

>>25957677
I'll vote Trump if he runs against Hillary, but otherwise no

>>25957625
>that you applied to in person.
McDonalds tells you to fuck off if you try that shit. Are you a babyboomer?

>>25957043

Top 10% of Americans pay over 78% of all taxes already and are taxed 50% of all their income.

>>25957365
Everyone bright already has that opportunity. Sanders just wants to push mediocre through the system.

I would be okay with it if we seriously restructured academia.

File: 1450769127670.jpg (289KB, 980x599px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 980x599px

If it's Bernie vs Trump I honestly don't know who I'll vote for. Bernie says a lot of nice things but most of them are unfeasible. He also seems limp dicked on foreign policy and certainly won't be someone who would inspire fear or respect on the international scene. That whole thing where he let those black lives matters fuckers take his stage proved that he has no backbone when something might be outside the PC realm.

Feel like at least Trump wouldn't take it on the chin from people, that people wouldn't so easy be prone to saber rattle at us.

>>25956927
>dude college is a right
>black life's matter
>Muh wage gap
>i-i apologize Hillary
they never let O-miley talk,

>>25958319
>Vote Trump
>World War 3 and people lynching Mexicans in the street

>Vote Bernie
>PC wins and we turn into Sweden

There's no winning

>>25958319
>He also seems limp dicked on foreign policy and certainly won't be someone who would inspire fear or respect on the international scene.

We control like 60% of the world's military power. Who gives a shit if there's some hard ass psychopath in the office ordering missile strikes on on African children in some country you didn't know existed?

Literally every major threat to our way of life is within our country's borders.

File: 1447742197375.jpg (81KB, 600x860px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 600x860px

>>25958482
Foreign Policy is 80% posturing and 20% intervention you fucking simp. It doesn't matter how large your military is if nobody respects and fears you at the same time.

>>25956878
Literally supporting theft by proxy so you can continue distracting yourself and not being happy.

That doesn't benefit anyone.

>>25958527
Yeah, I'm sure we need to destabilize Nicaragua to make sure the world community respects us.

Daily reminder that socialism doesn't work with a non-monoethnic society of 300 million+ people.
Socialism requires people contribute properly, and to give up what is asked of you. This goes against human nature, we will never be equal and egalitarianism is a pipe dream. We all seek to have more than someone else, it's what drives us as humans. Socialism/communism goes against human nature and therefore will never work. National healthcare will ruin the competition between healthcare providers and will only provide substandard healthcare at most. Social security is a failing system and won't last much longer. Government welfare is a failing system and won't last much longer. Socialism does not work, it will fail.

File: 1429042567899.jpg (165KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1252x1252px

>>25958554
What does Nicaragua matter to you? How is your apathy towards it superior to mine?

>>25957473
literally the 2 boards I browse 95% of the time

>>25956899

Mad wagie got butthurt

>>25957473
/pol/ was better before it became filled with cuckservatives and slacktivist natsoc faggots.
All the Trump shilling there is a disgrace

>>25958609
>dumb high school educated shitskin works in a factory for peanuts
>supports a party who wants to make it possible to pay him even less
>supports a party who wants to make it possible for him to be replaced by a robot arm and/or Ecuadorian illegal immigrant
>supports a party who wants him to starve on the street like he's "supposed to" when naturally his job role is replaced with something less expensive in favor of maximum business efficiency

Why are conservatives such shameless cuckolds?

File: 1453356611522.jpg (107KB, 800x850px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 800x850px

Anybody who likes that commie bernie sanders is from reddit and needs to get the fuck out.

>>25958680
>implying reddit is not crazy about memes and thus supports the hippest meme candidate, AKA the champion of teenage political ideals, AKA Donald Trump

Bernie Sanders is literally the SJW candidate. Voting for him is treason.

>>25958386
>scenario one
>not winning

>>25958650

>Trump
>for illegal immigration

Why are liberals always lying? Nobody who isn't a paid shill should be voting for any leftist, see another lying liberal right here >>25958697


Most Bernie supporters are underage HS kiddies who think money is magic and they can get free things because it's magic, I don't have to explain shit. Reddit LOVES Bernie and anyone who endorses Bernie is a mentally retarded child.

>Le /pol/ meme that Sanders doesn't understand economics
No, YOU don't understand economics. Going to college is a positive externality. What that means, because I bet most of you never took an economics class in your life and only believe what Fox news tells you, is " a benefit that is enjoyed by a third-party as a result of an economic transaction." So when you go to college, that is an economic transaction, and the third-party benefit is the country as a whole. The country benefits when you go to college. So the more people who go to college - the more the country benefits. Other countries understand this, they know that they need people going to college for the good of the whole country, and they have subsidized college so that education is cheap and or free. Not in America though. In America, the purchasing power of minimum wage has gone down 25% since 1978 so your dollar goes less far than it used to. In addition, college costs literally 10x as much ans has increased in cost way higher than the rate of inflation. Fun fact: college textbook prices have increased even higher than that.

People complain about OH NO THE RICH HAVE TO PAY MORE TAXES UNDER SANDERS HOW AWFUL - you people are so young that you do not realize how ABSURDLY low taxes are compared to what they were in the pre-nixon era. Before nixon, the top tax tiers could go up to 50%, 60%, 70%, even fucking 90% going back to the 50s. IRONICALLY, this is the "good old days" of America. Yes, the good old days of america, as conservatives say, were actually far more socialist than we are today. Google the tax brackets over the decade if you don't believe me.

What has happened is that rich people own the government now, they literally own congressmen and women to vote in ways that benefit them and propose bills that benefit them. Most recently, several republicans have proposed a bill that would allow lower speed internet to be called broadband. they're obviously in the pockets of big internet.

>>25958848
>this butthurt wall of text
beautiful. Please post more when Trump wins so I can relish in your tears

File: wearebernie.png (25KB, 472x508px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 472x508px

>>25958699
Look at what's trending on twitter right now. SJWs are invading us.

>>25958848
And it's not just big internet. Big oil owns the republican party. Some of these republican congressmen are not as stupid as you may think, they may very well believe in climate change but big oil pays them to pretend that it isn't happening, just as big tobacco did to pretend cigarettes dont cause cancer. the influence of money in politics has made a mockery of democracy. in america, it's not a democracy. it really isn't. big money, whether its big oil, big internet, or big pharma etc - they're the ones that run this country. they make us turn on eachother - they make us think that all our taxes are going to support black welfare queens with 15 kids when that's a fucking SMALL percentage of what our taxes are going towards. They make us fight eachother instead of them. And you guys all fall for it.
>is magic and they can get free things because it's magic, I don't have to explain shit.
le /pol/ meme again

Bernies policies would SAVE money in the long run. Why the fuck do you think we pay the most money in the world for healthcare? If healthcare here is 2x as much as britain or canada, is it 2x as better? you gotta be fucking kidding me if you believe that shit. it's free reign capitalism that has led to this, because let me tell you: If you let these big ass companies do whatever the fuck they want they will fuck the consumer. DUH.

>>25957522
>and bring business back here
Isn't that what Sanders is wanting to do?

>>25958848
Wominz study. Good for economics.

Suuuuuuure it is.

>>25958848
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvfHLr5aEqU

File: 1452514582015.gif (2MB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x640px

>>25958848
>>25958920
Part of me just wants to vote for Trump to swallow your tears.

File: 1950.png (102KB, 1214x758px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1214x758px

>>25958878
>>25958945
These are the IRS' 1950 tax rates. They stayed the same until 1964, which I will post next

File: 1964.png (158KB, 1242x848px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1242x848px

>>25958964
1964's tax rates which went down significantly

File: 1453083607957.jpg (38KB, 539x442px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 539x442px

>"bernie supporters are cucks who know nothing xddddd"
>30 reverse tumblr posts about how you're gonna vote based on who hates SJWs the most
>someone actually wants to have a debate
>"no im too lazy to read that" *posts memes*

NEETs should be banned from voting

File: 1982.png (119KB, 1224x462px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1224x462px

>>25958975
Guess who was president in 1982? Reagan

File: 1452938810698.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 657x527px

I'm /nobody/

As per usual, I give zero shits

>>25959008
Once again, Reagan

File: 1987.png (51KB, 1206x246px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1206x246px

>>25959046
missed pic. 1987

>>25958994

Maybe because your first point is retarded? Women are now the majority of College Graduates and what are they graduating in? Psychology, Wymen and Gender Studies. The US doesn't need more worthless degrees just to ask us how we'd like our fries done. Also, a oversaturation of people with College Degrees will basically turn them into shitty HS 2.0 Diplomas.

File: 1988.png (52KB, 1228x236px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1228x236px

Regan then goes FULL RETARD in 1988. Look at this tax code. Rich people were fucking spoiled. It was during the Regan era that wealth inequality really began to spiral out of control.

>>25958994
goons and twitter feminists have been raiding this board for fucking actual years and I will vote for whoever interns them. If you have a problem with that, go die.

File: 1991-1993.png (155KB, 1216x662px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1216x662px

George HW Bush raises taxes back

>>25959081

Wealth inequality is a good thing you dolt, it means new wealth is being created and being invested back into the capital instead of being spent on frivolous low end consumer shit.

>>25959080
>Also, a oversaturation of people with College Degrees will basically turn them into shitty HS 2.0 Diplomas.

Literally, how do you think this is true? Post-secondary is specialized education. Nobody comes out of high school with a marketable and independent skill.

Besides, the economic recession spurred a gigantic boom in higher education on loans and personal savings and really if you don't already think your degree is worthless, you have nothing to fear.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/20/survey-shows-growing-us-shortage-of-skilled-labor.html
http://abc7.com/society/us-millennials-among-the-worlds-least-skilled-people-says-study/554211/

>Each year, some 200,000 additional skilled foreign workers are admitted through a variety of existing visa programs.

your own political opinions are cucking you and you're too dumb to see it

File: 2013.png (153KB, 1224x572px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1224x572px

>>25959100
>>25959100
Tax rates since then have remained nearly the same since then.

So fucking compare today's tax rates, which are SUPER GENEROUS to the rich, compare those numbers to the numbers in the 70s, the numbers in the 60s, the numbers in the 50s and beforehand.

TODAYS RICH PEOPLE have it so easy. They have almost the lowest tax rates in American history. Rich people used to be charged tax rates of 70-90%!! And guess what, jobs didn't suddenly stop being created!

Someone fucking refute me without a 'le trump face' meme

File: 1452199341098.png (831KB, 678x664px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 678x664px

Trump will win solely on the power of meme magic.

>>25959124
That's the stupidest thing I've heard all day. Wealth inequality is inherently bad.

To put those numbers into context, $14,875 in 1988 is $29,802 today. So if you made less than that, you were taxed 15%. If you made higher than that, you were taxed at 28%.

So if you made the equivalent of 30,000$ in todays dollars back then, you'd be taxed at 28%, you'd be bringing home ~21,600$.

If you made 10,000,000$ a year, you'd be bringing home 7,200,000$

In what universe is that fair? That 28% tax rate is going to take a considerable chunk out of the regular worker and just takes out pocket change for the millionaire.

Of course, this is regan era economics, so the wealth will just "trickle down"

laughable. The poor have only gotten poorer in America.

File: dylanroof.jpg (36KB, 660x371px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 660x371px

>>25958920
>using /r9k/ as your tumblr blog

>>25959143
well I agree with you that taxes should be raised, but the effective tax rates during the eisenhower admin were significantly lower than the official rates.

>>25959185

>Wealth inequality is inherently bad.

citation needed

>a bunch of shit about how percentages work

I do understand how percentages work, anon.

>In what universe is that fair?

In what universe is it fair to take out more of a percentage from the higher earner? A percentage based tax ALREADY does that.

The rest of your post isn't worth responding to.

>>25959138

Let me put it to you in a way even you can understand.

Let's say the US has a shortage of engineers, which is true. Let's say there's 100,000 engineers but 300,000 open jobs for engineers, so a shortage of workers but a surplus of jobs.

Now let's half of all Americans now get free College which would be 150,000,000 Americans. And maybe 1% of those 150 Mil want to be an engineer and get a degree, that would be 1.5 Million new engineers competing for about 300,000 available jobs, what do you think would happen to the other 1.2 Million new engineers in the US and what would their degree be worth here?

>>25959138
>Literally, how do you think this is true? Post-secondary is specialized education. Nobody comes out of high school with a marketable and independent skill.

>implying people come out of college with marketable and independent skills

>>25959124
>it means new wealth is being created and being invested back into the capital
no actually the opposite
the wealth is being horded and not spent at all
do you think 1% of the population buys more stuff than 99% of the population?
it would be better for the economy if the wealth was distributed more since then more people would buy goods and services.

>>25959273
>In what universe is it fair to take out more of a percentage from the higher earner? A percentage based tax ALREADY does that.
We use a progressive tax system for a reason. Taxes hurt the poor more than they hurt the rich. To a poor person that percentage of their income, after they pay for their rent, food, bills, etc. is a very large amount. A rich person can afford to spare more of their income. The only countries that don't use progressive tax codes are underdeveloped shithole third world countries. In addition, we need wealth to be redistributed. Otherwise the poor will stay poor forever and the rich will stay rich forever. We need some money to be redistributed, or else the rich will be our fucking feudal lords.

Progressive tax codes are good. Even the most conservative of economists admit this.

File: 1452989183891.jpg (44KB, 640x519px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x519px

too lazy to get involved in edgy /pol/ arguing but i never get the opposition against a heavy tax on the super elite

i mean, when i look at the koch brothers
>literal billions just sitting there
>they're almost 80 years old
>instead of playing Jesus Jr. and making historical philanthropy they're throwing 800 million down the drain to try and buy politics

and i know that's just those dudes, but there's no denying that the elite are largely fucking with out politics, climate, etc, basically murdering and fucking everything with lobbyists because apparently you can't afford enough with just 2 billion, you need 5 at least

i literally don't care if any of these people get a heavy tax, no one needs 5+ billion dollars and it's proven by the fact that that money often just sits there or gets invested in more shit that just hurts us. am i really supposed to not want to see walton money go to things that actually help people rather than funding their donations to some anti-gay organization that's 1. retarded and 2. literally not gonna work.

notice how the politicians that yell "FREE STUFF" the loudest are also the ones getting lobbyist money to say so in the first place. it's ridiculous that i can go bankrupt over an injury but the walton family is being defended because they "deserve" that money.

>>25959283
nearly 40% of Americans already have college educations, you cuck

add to that that a surplus of engineers could never possible be a bad thing since they literally invent industrial processes and create the entire framework for industry

if there are suddenly 1.5 million new people with some sort of engineering education and they're all competing for the same few jobs (which is already the case if you're taking globalization into account, and I don't think you did), some of them aren't going to make the cut and they'll have to do something else. But what's wrong with that? Why would you be in favor of stiff competition and a more competent working labor pool as opposed to some retarded model of extreme scarcity? Why do you even think that every American would seek a college education if given the opportunity, and how do you think something like 1% of the entire population would pursue the same engineering degrees? You're so disconnected that you think everybody has the same poo in loo tier affinity for high status aspie jobs.

Past all of this garbage, Sanders is proposing a living minimum wage, so it doesn't really fucking matter if there's any surplus of skilled labor. That could literally only be a good thing. Anybody who doesn't find a place here has an edge over global competition.

>>25959359
>too lazy to get involved in edgy /pol/ arguing but i never get the opposition against a heavy tax on the super elite

They already pay 50% of their earned income and the top 10% of all Americans are already responsible for 78% of all taxed income, meaning those top 10% of earners in America pay more in taxes than the other 90% combined. All dem programs liberals and niggers love so much are paid for by the rich.

France tried to tax anyone who made over 1 Million a year 90% of their income. The rich just said "Fuck it Pierre, I'm out of here" and threatened to flee. The poor and middle class can't afford to pay for all dem programs so France cancelled the proposed bill.

Just see this video for clarity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvfHLr5aEqU

>>25959359
right, there are people on this planet right now with the personal wealth to launch objects into outer space, but there are still millions of people who can barely afford enough food

It's ironic to me that conservatives, whose favorite phrase for skipping out on teaching their children anything is "life isn't fair", argue that if you see a problem in one dynasty, or even one man, amassing more wealth than he could ever possibly blow out of his ass on superfluous consumer goods every single day, that you're not being just and fair.

UNFAIR is when one baby is born with his entire luxurious life planned and paid for, while another baby is born with nothing but problems to sort out.
take it from this Debs quote:

>Competition was natural enough at one time, but do you think you are competing today? Many of you think you are. Against whom? Against Rockefeller? About as I would if I had a wheelbarrow and competed with the Santa Fe from here to Kansas City.

>>25959359
>notice how the politicians that yell "FREE STUFF" the loudest are also the ones getting lobbyist money to say so in the first place.
And notice how since WalMart doesn't pay their workers enough money, their workers go on FoodStamps, and often those Food Stamp dollars go right back to the WalMarts they work at so they can pay for food.

So you, the American taxpayer, are paying money to WalMart workers so that they can get foodstamps because WalMart doesn't pay them enough, and then WalMart gets the foodstamp money on top of that.

So if you are a taxpayer of this country you are subsidizing WalMart. They don't pay their workers enough, so you are the only who must pay for their food - so they can spend it at WalMart. And WalMart can't raise their employees salaries, oh no no, then they'd make no money! Poor WalMart.

Notice how corporate welfare is okay but if you're ever on welfare then you are the scum of the earth.

Welcome to America

>>25959407
you know that most of the actual elite like the 1% don't pay that many taxes?
do you know how many tax haven there are?
taxes do fall on the rich but the global elite that are above the rich avoid them all together

>>25959407
>They already pay 50% of their earned income
The top tax rate is 39.6% and we know that those rich enough to be in that tax bracket have lawyers who look into loopholes and tax breaks for them so they are never even paying that 39.6% rate

In 2011, Warren Buffet said that he paid only 17.4 percent of his taxable income in federal income taxes

>top 10% of all Americans are already responsible for 78% of all taxed income
The top 10% of Americans probably make 78% of the fucking income that isn't saying anything

>>25959479
>>25959507

You forget about State taxes, 39% is just federal taxes. Besides, what do you believe they should be taxed, 60%, 90%, 100%? Even if you took their offshore money and taxed the top 10% of earners in the US, that still wouldn't be able to pay for Universal Healthcare alone in the US.

Instead of using Marxist Critical Theory, how about you show some real, sensible solutions.

>>25957677
I wasn't aware the US military needed rebuilding, Doesn't it have the highest budget of any military on the planet?

Bump for buttflustered trumptards.

File: 1452473737631.jpg (97KB, 783x960px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 783x960px

Get out Reddit.
Cgfghyffbb original content.