The real reason people like us are alone is because human population is too high. We are mean't to live in small communities of friends, families and neighbours. This system worked up until the industrial revolution where the world become urbanised and interconnected.
The male population is 51% while the female population is 49%, this is not due to female infanticide but instead the natural birth rate because males were once more likely to die hunting. This may not seem like much, but the world population is 7,000,000,000. This means that 1% is 70,000,000 people who literally won't find a girl.
We literally need a huge population reduction. The human population shouldn't be 7 billion. Nor 1 billion. Nor 100 million. Nor 10 million. The population should just be 1 million people.
I dream of the day when the plague returns to decimate the human population and bring utopia.
>4 births per second
>255 births per minute
>367,200 births per 24 hour day
>134,028,000 births per year
Most of these people will live for at least fifty years and will produce two children. So the population will double or triple every generation.
I agree with you 100% but most people will complain that killing off people that already exist is out of the question, and eugenics/reproductive license are both unethical. And please let me know when you find a solid argument in favor of either one of those views.
When finite rescources run out, you'll quickly see a massive drop in population.
Same for any ecosystem really, they can boom in population until the energy runs out then a serious drop to miniscule levels occurs. But instead of food, we're using artificial energy stores as our means to survive
>Most of these people will live for at least fifty years and will produce two children
Lol no. There are 39 countries with that fertility rate, and they're all shitholes that don't have a decent infant mortality rate
I agree with your sentiment though. Once we can automate most industrial/service applications there will be a fuckhuge glut of people without marketable skills
The difference between being the 2nd ugliest person in your village of 200 people vs you being the 200th ugliest as well as stupidest and shitty person in your city of 4m is very great.
Are you fucking retarded?
The population in developed countries is actually decreasing. Africa and Asia are the ones causing the huge world population.
Because of faggots like you who advocate not having children here because of Africa and Asia having too much people, the world will be 99% black and yellow in a 100 years.
Now that I think about it, you're right. Don't have children. It will be better for the gene pool.
It's a shame we can't just place restrictions on who has kids or have them obey those laws and accept that they're not special snowflakes and shouldn't pass on their genes. Instead we would need to load the atmosphere with radiation and chemicals and end up fucking up the healthy kids in the process.
>Now that I think about it, you're right. Don't have children. It will be better for the gene pool.
Either way. The 99% black population can sort their shit out or not, which they won't, and in the end it's all the same. Why do complete dipshits like you think the only way to solve the problem is to instigate breeding wars rather than try to educate or sterilise them? Too afraid of being compared to stormfags if you acknowledge that you can't really cull the population and be a slimy hypocrite altruist in the process?
No, over population isn't a problem. The UN has been predicting peak population at about 2020 and then a decline for 40+ years.
No, about 51% if all children born are male but enough die young that about 50.5% over the *overall* population is *female*.
tl;dr - go cry somewhere else
Yeah right, it will begin to decline after we've crapped out as many mudchildren as the planet can sustain and have turned it into a barren husk. Then we'll start to die of things like plague and dehydration, which aren't magically irrelevant to the subject of overpopulation.
Niggers die as fast as they breed, because the don't have the collective brain cells to be able to build even basic civilisations, let alone cure diseases. If it weren't for western intervention and immigration, it would be fine. Asian Population is still an issue.
>the world will be 99% black and yellow in a 100 years.
>Asian Population is still an issue.
Not really, if I can see anyone turning the decimated ruins of the West into something useful it's them. Japan and the West are killing themselves off because they don't want to live in that squalor Fallout style, that simple. If there were anything to save, we wouldn't be doing it by trying to keep up with other populations. They are growing because they don't understand the consequences and most will die horrible deaths and still not know why.
two parents, two children
not all children will reproduce
what does that give us? population DECLINE
natural selection is working, let it be. edgy dystopian societies from wannabe fedoras is completely retarded. We are nearing the next extinction level event (many factors, principle being super-volcanic erupt). Society is working as it needs to. The talented will still reproduce, evolve, cradled by the social support.
Threads like these are Dunning Krueger in effect. Don't expect much else from the internet.
Man, are you ignorant.
UN analysis of food production shows that North America alone produces enough food for the entire world to eat at 'Murica levels and the Colorado River alone has enough fresh water for everyone.
Lack of food and water is about a lack of access not a lack of resources.
>this comment is very very very original
Gehusbeu yeah meme
>natural selection is working, let it be.
How *does* that work? How does natural selection apply when it's the poor people with nothing else to which they can apply themselves, that get money and food thrown at them simply for propagating life? Something almost anybody can do, yet it's only them that do it?
India and China will have 1.5 billion people each by 2030. Two countries with almost a half of the entire world's population. How is that not an issue? Japan's fine, but that's a comparatively tiny population.
The US produces enough soy to feed the world but feed it to cows instead, which waste the fresh water and fart tons of methane into the atmosphere all year. But no one wants to change their shitty habits, just pretend like everything will work itself out and people will come out on top in the end.
>millenial who's never actually traveled to an Asian country
So you want to live like a slave in a smog polluted land? Chinky races have absoultely zero respect for the enviorment and they're fucking greed opportunists.
Then why do I read shit like a baby is more likely to be born as a female than as a male because XX chromosome is more probable than XY or some crap like that
Also why in many shithole countries the male ratio tends to be so high?
It's not an issue because it's their problem to solve. The idiots still having kids will reap what they sow and have to teach their children to fight for their food. Who cares if they're white or brown, they helped to devalue every other life on the planet by having kids.
they will feel the selection pressures before too long
furthermore, many of humanity's greatest mutations i.e talents come from those less well off, because they form the majority. To remove that side of society is to invite stagnation. This should be obvious, so I suspect that you are not as smart as you think you are.
>So you want to live like a slave in a smog polluted land?
I never said it wouldn't be smog polluted, or that I wanted to live there. They do, or else they'd be seeing lower birthrates too.
Your right. The problem is that I can't legally build a home until a pandemic, a global natural disaster or a WW3 occurs, because I would have to do it when it's not in the world's governments best interests to remove me.
I'm a qualified biologist and geologist. Perhaps I can find a job in Antarctica, work at a base. Each time I visit, bring some basic colonisation equipment to hide and stack up over the years until the disaster occurs and I can run off and start a colony.
you are clinically retarded. The whole biological reasoning behind poor people having lots of babies versus nurturing a few, is to buy more tickets at the lottery. Many self made millionaires were not born into money. It's fucking basic evolution, did you miss school a few too many times anon?
>he actually thinks a plague could kill the majority of people in this age of medicine and technology.
CDC/WHO would make that almost impossible unless the virus's infection capabilities was beyond our control and both high mortality after a certain amount of time, allowing for 99% of the population to be killed without it killing that last 1%
Basically impossible scenario OP, we'll either all die from some ray from an exploding star or you'll just die alone.
Btw, decimating the human population means you would be reducing it by 10%, dumbass.
You probably will be very old when any of this happens. I am not of the opinion that our generation will be the one to see the climax. It will be a slow process, children will be born and die seeing everything they know depreciate. At least we had a golden age of sorts with the internet and shit.
>starting a colony on hell in reverse
A peek into your future, enjoy.
You need to stop insulting other people's intelligence if your reading comprehension is gonna be this goddamn terrible. You are conflating money with natural selection. What happens when the economy crashes?
I hate having to remember this shit...having children is cruel and should be fucking illegal. Asian parents are the worst offenders too, their children are used like some backup retirement plan.
Yes, but climate change will make it more habitable in a human life, both to humans and animal populations.
Antarctica could support a permanent population in the same way Greenland supports a population. If Antarctica was close enough to South America, Africa or Australia; it would have a native people.
By hunting penguin, seal and other animals in the enormous colonies, a person could easily survive without having an impact on animal population. This is what Antarctic explorers ate. The only problem with settling Antarctica is that it can't support a large population because it would be unsustainable.
China's birth rate is 1.7, and most experts believe lifting the one child policy isn't going to help much. Every rich modernized Asian country has birth rates lower than most Western countries. South Korea is at less than 1.1; Japan 1.4 but they started their decline earlier. Replacement rate is 2.2.
People here have no idea what they're talking about.
>it can't support a large population because it would be unsustainable.
All the more reason to entertain the idea of actually regulating human population growth in any way, shape or form at all, which most people are too cucked by Semite fuckery and their own personal fear of death to accept.
>Not wearing wool socks and protective gear
It's like you live nowhere near the far north or south. Also
>implying it's not fun as fuck to peel off dead skin
The only enjoyable thing about winter to be honest senpai.
A virus which is airborne, spread through coughing, lies dormant for several days after infection, is anti-biotic resistant and causes a quick death could decimate the world population. Once a million people were infected, there would be exponential growth, with the number multiplying every day. Since every airport is connected, train stations and roads to almost every village and boats to every island; the vast majority of people would get infected.
The only issue is the chance of a virus like this appearing, which is slim unless a bio terrorist group releases one, which is entirely possible.
>Since every airport is connected, train stations and roads to almost every village and boats to every island; the vast majority of people would get infected.
Don't forget all the walk-in med centers popping up on every corner in murrica because the emergency rooms are full of drug addicts.
Humanity is not going to change its ways unless it's trapped in a corner. So if you want to create an environmentalist utopia, you'll need to force it. How do you force it? By making sure there is no resource left to exploit.
This is why I take 30 min showers, eat at least a pound of meat a day, always keep my home heated with the air-conditioning on, and travel by plane as much as I can.
Save the world by destroying it, so that from the ashes a superior civilization can be birthed.
>Save the world by destroying it, so that from the ashes a superior civilization can be birthed.
I can dig it, but I don't expect humans to come out on top. I have no stake in whether or not they die off and leave room for nature to try something new. Instead of desperately clawing to save the last maybe thousand years of being shit-monkeys, we could invest in technology to preserve our knowledge and distribute DNA samples around the galaxy, but we won't do that because it's not profitable.
>A jet plane is going to increase earth's temperature XDXDXD!
Y-Yes anon that w-will happen.
>idiots don't even realize that the same scientists shilling for warmer climates were the same ones going on about global cooling during the 60's and early 70's
You think you're redpilled but your bluepilled as fuck. 97% of scientists believe this. The 3% that don't come from Southern universities which have been funded by Republicans who have literal ties to the oil industry. The climate change conspiracy isn't that climate change isn't real, but that people are trying to create a failing denial movement.
Even if it were a conspiracy; there is literally no reason why anybody could profit from it. Sustainable companies do not have enough money to create a conspiracy on this scale.
>two people will produce two children. So the population will double every generation.
>Humanity is not going to change its ways unless it's trapped in a corner
You're implying humanity will have the perceptiveness to realize its trapped in a corner
antinatalism. If gambling on human existence in any set of circumstances is morally questionable then it should go double for the indigent. As far as I am concerned nobody should have an inalienable right to reproduce and people should actually understand the gravity of creating a person instead of leaning on a failure of the categorical imperative to justify their behavior.
lol @ 1million. Who are you some fuckin secret sect billionaire jew? fuck yourself
the whole earth population could fit in texas and live comfortably and you faggots still try to push the overpopulation myth too suit your agenda.
because there's no 2D waifus on planet nigger
Who needs 2D when you can get a real life 3D one Anon? For a goat you can buy this.